[Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 02:45:46 EDT --- Okay, thanks. When you think the rebuilt packages can be moved from testing to stable repository, please modify (edit) the submitted push request. Closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #11 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 04:44:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) This package is only used on the K12Linux Live image and only exists to make LTSP easier to get working. So, while it might generically be about binding the virtual bridge to an interface, shifting the focus/name to that would only confuse the very people for whom it is intended, which is new users of K12Linux. I haven't proposed to make that package generic, but to explain better what it does. I have proposed specific changes and in these changes the focus is still on ltsp, but there is also an explanation of what the package does. (BTW, is it okay to address multiple comments in one message, or should I create a separate comment for each point raised?) You can address multiple comments in one message. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #8 from Adel Gadllah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 04:55:51 EDT --- What outstanding issues remain for libproxy to be in Fedora? Nothing, Nicolas has to import and build it... ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466692] Review Request: iml - Finds solutions to systems of linear equations over integers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466692 Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 06:22:29 EDT --- * rpmlint gives: iml-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package which is against the guidelines, but I don't think this is important (and besides I think it is a bug in rpm, not to have debug info extracted from static libs). * follow relevant guidelines * free software, no license included because upstream doesn't ship a license consistent with the code * match upstream: 03a2e361bf9574ae8d32c19a392eeb66 iml-1.0.2.tar.gz * all static correctly packaged library * %files section right One suggestion, use make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' too tentatively keep header file timestamps. Also you should contact upstream to ask them to change the COPYING file. (well in fact the license isn't that clear when repl/ is used, but it isn't th ecase in fedora, and in any case they should clarify the license). APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #17 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 06:44:50 EDT --- When you have applied for sponsorship, tell here what is your account name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #19 from Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 06:42:33 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #39 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 07:25:30 EDT --- I you have rpms, I'd like to look at the files to see where differences are. I tried a scratch build, but it failed: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=888335 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466692] Review Request: iml - Finds solutions to systems of linear equations over integers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466692 Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 06:34:25 EDT --- Thanks for the suggestions, I really value them. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: iml Short Description: Finds solutions to systems of linear equations over integers Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226526] Merge Review: vim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226526 --- Comment #13 from Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 08:09:38 EDT --- Review for release 1.fc10: * RPM name is OK * Source vim-7.2.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Source vim-7.2-lang.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Source vim-7.2-extra.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Source forth.vim is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of vim-minimal looks OK * rpmlint of vim-X11 looks OK * rpmlint of vim-debuginfo looks OK * rpmlint of vim-enhanced looks OK * rpmlint of vim-common looks OK * File list of vim-minimal looks OK * File list of vim-X11 looks OK * File list of vim-debuginfo looks OK * File list of vim-enhanced looks OK * File list of vim-common looks OK * Config files of vim-minimal looks OK * Config files of vim-enhanced looks OK * Config files of vim-common looks OK Needs work: * Desktop file: the Categories tag should not contain Application any more (wiki: Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) * Desktop file: the category Application is not valid (http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html) * As vim ships icons in the hicolor directory, it should have Requires: hicolor-icon-theme https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-September/msg00282.html * A few rpmlint warnings: [EMAIL PROTECTED] vim]$ rpmlint vim-common-7.2.022-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm | grep spurious vim-common.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/vim-common-7.2.022/README_ami.txt.info vim-common.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/vim-common-7.2.022/README.txt.info vim-common.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/vim-common-7.2.022/README_amibin.txt.info vim-common.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/vim-common-7.2.022/README_amisrc.txt.info * Like Robert said in comment #11, the man directories are not owned by any package, please resolve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688
Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #11 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 08:27:54 EDT
---
I'd suggest dropping COPYING since it is the GPL and not the LGPL.
Also the README is useless in my opinion.
using
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p'
may keep timestamps of include files.
install-info knows automatically how to deal with compression, please
remove the .gz from install-info invocations.
I would also suggest using
%{_infodir}/%{name}.info*
to catch different compression or no compression.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #12 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 08:35:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320799) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320799) simple patch for spec file keep timestamp of man page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #13 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 08:39:17 EDT --- Juha have you done any other work in fedora (comment on reviews, other submissions, and anything else) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||) --- Comment #23 from Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 08:46:29 EDT --- Joe, can you have a look? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 Stefan Seefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |.ca)| --- Comment #51 from Stefan Seefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 10:59:00 EDT --- Sorry for my silence. In addition to general business, I have been debating whether or not to submit another package of mine for inclusion into Fedora (which, as I understand, is one way to become sponsored). I'm going to submit a qmtest package (http://www.codesourcery.com/qmtest) within the coming days. Are you the one to review that, then ? Thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #38 from Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 11:44:38 EDT --- Hey Devrim, I think it's time to decide wether to call the package postgresql-slony1 or slony1, and to rename everything throughout the code. For instance the spec file is called postgresql-slony1.spec, I'd say rename it to slony1.spec Furthermore I've added 2 patches to the spec and the init script which clean a few things up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #156674|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #39 from Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 11:46:17 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320805) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320805) cleanups -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #40 from Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 11:46:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320806) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320806) more cleanups -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #320806|0 |1 is patch|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #320805|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| Attachment #320805|0 |1 is patch|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #41 from Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 11:51:41 EDT --- Hi Ruben, (In reply to comment #38) I think it's time to decide wether to call the package postgresql-slony1 or slony1, and to rename everything throughout the code. Let's make it slony1 -- I want to get rid of postgresql- prefix from many of my packages. Furthermore I've added 2 patches to the spec and the init script which clean a few things up. Thanks! I'll check them soon. Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: PyMOL - |Review Request: pymol - |python molecular graphics |python molecular graphics --- Comment #34 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 12:12:34 EDT --- Okay. For consistency please use %defattr(-,root,root,-) also for subpackages (you can fix this when importing to Fedora CVS). --- This package (pymol) is APPROVED by mtasaka --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #52 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 12:15:59 EDT --- Okay. Then I will wait for your another review request. (By the way would you also update this package, too?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #53 from Stefan Seefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 12:33:32 EDT --- Yes, I'm going to release Synopsis 0.11 in a couple of days, and can submit a new package based on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467627] New: Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 Summary: Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/fsniper.spec SRPM URL: http://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/fsniper-1.3.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: fsniper is a tool that monitors a given set of directories for new files. Then, based on the new file's type or name, it invokes a script to be run (any executable via the shell) on that file. Common uses include making a single drop directory for all things from a webbrowser etc, and having semi-intelligent scripts figure out what to do with those files. You write the scripts yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 13:30:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libev Short Description: High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features Owners: mnowak Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: mnowak -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #24 from jebba [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 14:06:13 EDT --- I flagged this to fedora‑cvs? a couple days ago or so. It had been flagged fedora-cvs+, but it may have been me that flagged it that way instead of ? accidentally. Anyway, I *think* I've done everything I need to do to get this package into Fedora and am waiting on upstream to make the CVS module (when trying to check it out, I get Error: cvs server: cannot find module `fmit' - ignored). In short, the ball is in some fedora-admin's court, I believe. But if there is something I missed that I need to do first, let me know. Mamoru Tasaka thanks again for all your help. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088
Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 14:52:35 EDT
---
Some notes for 2.0.2-1:
A. %description stage
* License
- is actually BSD (also see CHANGES.txt)
Perhaps you want to change the license of .pc.in
file.
* (Build)Requires
* For -devel subpackage
- Requires: protobuf is redundant because protobuf-compiler
already requires protobuf.
* For -python subpackage
- Would you explain why -python subpackage has Requires
python-setuptools?
--
Additional remark about python subpackage:
The -python subpackage should not depend on the base package or any other
packages because it is a pure python implementation.
--
- Well, for technical discussion, does this mean that there will
be no problem even if the installed version of protobuf and
protobuf-python differ? (if you don't write Requires this
can happen).
This discussion can be applied for -java subpackage.
* For -java subpackage
- About BuildRequires: java-devel = 1.6.0
-- If this means that Java binding needs OpenJDK to
build, then this line must be
BuildRequires: java-devel = 1:1.6.0
java-devel vitrual Provides by java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel
has Epoch 1 for historical reason (see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires )
-- If either OpenJDK or icedtea can be used to build,
then BuildRequires: java-devel = 1.7 is sufficient
(Note that 1.7 1:1.6)
* For -javadoc subpackage
- Requires: %{name}-%{version}-%{release}-java is perhaps a typo.
* Shipping -static subpackage
- Please explain why this package is needed where -devel
subpackage is provided which includes .so symlink libraries.
Usually static archives must be removed unless
the package does not provide shared libraries.
B. %prep, %build, %instll, scriptlets stage:
* Timestamps
- When using cp or install commands, add -p option to keep timestamps
on installed files
- Also this package uses install-sh when installing files. In such case
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT CPPROG=cp -p
is useful to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible.
('INSTALL=install -p' option is usually tricks for Makefiles based
on Makefiles generated by more recent Makefiles and not using install-sh)
* Internal libraries
- This package uses gtest library to build.
This is already provided as gtest rpm on Fedora system-widely so
this package must be patched to use system-wide gtest library.
* Unneeded /sbin/ldconfig call
- There is no need that -devel subpackage should call /sbin/ldconfig on
post/postun scriptlets.
C. %files entry
* Macros
- Please refer to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros
%_prefix/include must be %_includedir.
* For -devel subpackage
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/include/google/protobuf/
protobuf-devel-2.0.2-1.fc10.i386
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/include/google/
file /usr/include/google is not owned by any package
- Well, it seems that some other packages also install files
under %_includedir/google, however when installing this -devel
subpackage (and its dependency rpms), %_includedir/google
is not owned by any packages.
So for now %_includedir/google must also be owned by
this rpm.
* For -python subpackage
%files python -f python/INSTALLED_FILES
- This method (i.e. listing %files entry by using INSTALLED_FILES
created by setup.py) is forbidden on Fedora.
With this method directory ownership issue is frequently ignored
(and actually for this case):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories
!!For -vim subpackage
! Neither of %_datadir/vim/vimfiles/{ftdetect,syntax} are owned
by any packages, however I will ask vim maintainer about this.
* For -java subpackage
- %{_datadir}/maven2/poms,
[Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 --- Comment #11 from Paul Wouters [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 15:52:41 EDT --- - I've changed the make command to run with QUIET=no, so it does not require a patch. - the chroot contains no secret information, and is just there for security in case the unbound process would get compromised with a buffer overflow. Since there is nothing to hide, using world-readable seems appropriate. - I've created a separate libs package as you recommended - I've added the unbound group Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound-1.0.2-3.fc9.src.rpm initscript: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound.init -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi-tools - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 Peter Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #15 from Peter Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 17:10:29 EDT --- Closing as its now built and in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 Andreas Thienemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236856] Review Request: brlcad - An extensive Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) modeling system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236856 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 17:42:45 EDT --- For anyone who'd wish to follow up on this, his latest SRPM appears to be: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/9/SRPMS/brlcad-7.12.4-1.fc9.kwizart.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467641] New: Review Request: sugar-maze - short summary here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-maze - short summary here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Summary: Review Request: sugar-maze - short summary here Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: spec info here SRPM URL: srpm info here Description: A simple maze game for the XO laptop. You can play by yourself or race to solve it with your buddies. Up to 3 people can play on a single XO laptop and lots more can play when shared over the network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - short summary here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 17:51:57 EDT --- again, sorry Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-maze.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-maze-6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A simple maze game for the XO laptop. You can play by yourself or race to solve it with your buddies. Up to 3 people can play on a single XO laptop and lots more can play when shared over the network. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889260 [EMAIL PROTECTED] noarch]$ rpmlint -i sugar-maze-6-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-maze.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: Amusements/Games, Amusements/Graphics, Applications/Archiving, Applications/Communications, Applications/Databases, Applications/Editors, Applications/Emulators, Applications/Engineering, Applications/File, Applications/Internet, Applications/Multimedia, Applications/Productivity, Applications/Publishing, Applications/System, Applications/Text, Development/Debug, Development/Debuggers, Development/Languages, Development/Libraries, Development/System, Development/Tools, Documentation, System Environment/Base, System Environment/Daemons, System Environment/Kernel, System Environment/Libraries, System Environment/Shells, User Interface/Desktops, User Interface/X, User Interface/X Hardware Support. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i sugar-maze-6-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-maze.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: Amusements/Games, Amusements/Graphics, Applications/Archiving, Applications/Communications, Applications/Databases, Applications/Editors, Applications/Emulators, Applications/Engineering, Applications/File, Applications/Internet, Applications/Multimedia, Applications/Productivity, Applications/Publishing, Applications/System, Applications/Text, Development/Debug, Development/Debuggers, Development/Languages, Development/Libraries, Development/System, Development/Tools, Documentation, System Environment/Base, System Environment/Daemons, System Environment/Kernel, System Environment/Libraries, System Environment/Shells, User Interface/Desktops, User Interface/X, User Interface/X Hardware Support. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467642] New: Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 Summary: Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-read.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-read-52-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Read activity allows the laptop to act as a book reader. It has a simple interface, and will view many kinds of text and image-based book- like materials. It will have particular strengths in handheld mode, with extremely low power consumption and simple navigation controls. Read can read PDF files, single-page TIFF files, and also read DJVU files. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889282 [EMAIL PROTECTED] noarch]$ rpmlint -i sugar-read-52-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-read.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: Amusements/Games, Amusements/Graphics, Applications/Archiving, Applications/Communications, Applications/Databases, Applications/Editors, Applications/Emulators, Applications/Engineering, Applications/File, Applications/Internet, Applications/Multimedia, Applications/Productivity, Applications/Publishing, Applications/System, Applications/Text, Development/Debug, Development/Debuggers, Development/Languages, Development/Libraries, Development/System, Development/Tools, Documentation, System Environment/Base, System Environment/Daemons, System Environment/Kernel, System Environment/Libraries, System Environment/Shells, User Interface/Desktops, User Interface/X, User Interface/X Hardware Support. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i sugar-read-52-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-read.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: Amusements/Games, Amusements/Graphics, Applications/Archiving, Applications/Communications, Applications/Databases, Applications/Editors, Applications/Emulators, Applications/Engineering, Applications/File, Applications/Internet, Applications/Multimedia, Applications/Productivity, Applications/Publishing, Applications/System, Applications/Text, Development/Debug, Development/Debuggers, Development/Languages, Development/Libraries, Development/System, Development/Tools, Documentation, System Environment/Base, System Environment/Daemons, System Environment/Kernel, System Environment/Libraries, System Environment/Shells, User Interface/Desktops, User Interface/X, User Interface/X Hardware Support. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467643] New: Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 Summary: Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-speak.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-speak-9-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Speak is a talking face for the XO laptop. Anything you type will be spoken aloud using the XO's speech synthesizer, espeak. You can adjust the accent, rate and pitch of the voice as well as the shape of the eyes and mouth. This is a great way to experiment with the speech synthesizer, learn to type or just have fun making a funny face for your XO. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889310 [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i sugar-speak-9-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-speak.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: Amusements/Games, Amusements/Graphics, Applications/Archiving, Applications/Communications, Applications/Databases, Applications/Editors, Applications/Emulators, Applications/Engineering, Applications/File, Applications/Internet, Applications/Multimedia, Applications/Productivity, Applications/Publishing, Applications/System, Applications/Text, Development/Debug, Development/Debuggers, Development/Languages, Development/Libraries, Development/System, Development/Tools, Documentation, System Environment/Base, System Environment/Daemons, System Environment/Kernel, System Environment/Libraries, System Environment/Shells, User Interface/Desktops, User Interface/X, User Interface/X Hardware Support. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] noarch]$ rpmlint -i sugar-speak-9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-speak.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: Amusements/Games, Amusements/Graphics, Applications/Archiving, Applications/Communications, Applications/Databases, Applications/Editors, Applications/Emulators, Applications/Engineering, Applications/File, Applications/Internet, Applications/Multimedia, Applications/Productivity, Applications/Publishing, Applications/System, Applications/Text, Development/Debug, Development/Debuggers, Development/Languages, Development/Libraries, Development/System, Development/Tools, Documentation, System Environment/Base, System Environment/Daemons, System Environment/Kernel, System Environment/Libraries, System Environment/Shells, User Interface/Desktops, User Interface/X, User Interface/X Hardware Support. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467644] New: Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 Summary: Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-memorize.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-memorize-28-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The game memorize is about finding matching pairs. A pair can consist of any multimedia object. At the moment these are images, sounds and text but this could be extended to animations or movie snippets as well. Which pairs do match is up to the creator of the game. Memorize is actually more than just a predefined game you can play, it allows you to create new games yourself as well. Koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=888662 [EMAIL PROTECTED] noarch]$ rpmlint -i sugar-memorize-28-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-memorize.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: Amusements/Games, Amusements/Graphics, Applications/Archiving, Applications/Communications, Applications/Databases, Applications/Editors, Applications/Emulators, Applications/Engineering, Applications/File, Applications/Internet, Applications/Multimedia, Applications/Productivity, Applications/Publishing, Applications/System, Applications/Text, Development/Debug, Development/Debuggers, Development/Languages, Development/Libraries, Development/System, Development/Tools, Documentation, System Environment/Base, System Environment/Daemons, System Environment/Kernel, System Environment/Libraries, System Environment/Shells, User Interface/Desktops, User Interface/X, User Interface/X Hardware Support. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i sugar-memorize-28-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-memorize.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: Amusements/Games, Amusements/Graphics, Applications/Archiving, Applications/Communications, Applications/Databases, Applications/Editors, Applications/Emulators, Applications/Engineering, Applications/File, Applications/Internet, Applications/Multimedia, Applications/Productivity, Applications/Publishing, Applications/System, Applications/Text, Development/Debug, Development/Debuggers, Development/Languages, Development/Libraries, Development/System, Development/Tools, Documentation, System Environment/Base, System Environment/Daemons, System Environment/Kernel, System Environment/Libraries, System Environment/Shells, User Interface/Desktops, User Interface/X, User Interface/X Hardware Support. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|201449 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244485] Review Request: perl-XML-Filter-ExceptionLocator - Filter to add line/col numbers to SAX errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244485 Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449 Depends on|201449 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467422] F10 branch for vnc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467422 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:14:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195678] Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678 Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449 Depends on|201449 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:16:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466795] Review Request: boswars-addons - addon maps for Bos Wars
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466795 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:18:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467645] New: Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645 Summary: Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-distance.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-distance-13-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Distance (aka Acoustic Tape Measure) determines the physical distance between two XOs by measuring how long it takes sound pulses to travel between them. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889518 [EMAIL PROTECTED] noarch]$ rpmlint -i sugar-distance-13-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-distance.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: Amusements/Games, Amusements/Graphics, Applications/Archiving, Applications/Communications, Applications/Databases, Applications/Editors, Applications/Emulators, Applications/Engineering, Applications/File, Applications/Internet, Applications/Multimedia, Applications/Productivity, Applications/Publishing, Applications/System, Applications/Text, Development/Debug, Development/Debuggers, Development/Languages, Development/Libraries, Development/System, Development/Tools, Documentation, System Environment/Base, System Environment/Daemons, System Environment/Kernel, System Environment/Libraries, System Environment/Shells, User Interface/Desktops, User Interface/X, User Interface/X Hardware Support. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i sugar-distance-13-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-distance.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: Amusements/Games, Amusements/Graphics, Applications/Archiving, Applications/Communications, Applications/Databases, Applications/Editors, Applications/Emulators, Applications/Engineering, Applications/File, Applications/Internet, Applications/Multimedia, Applications/Productivity, Applications/Publishing, Applications/System, Applications/Text, Development/Debug, Development/Debuggers, Development/Languages, Development/Libraries, Development/System, Development/Tools, Documentation, System Environment/Base, System Environment/Daemons, System Environment/Kernel, System Environment/Libraries, System Environment/Shells, User Interface/Desktops, User Interface/X, User Interface/X Hardware Support. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Note: No language support at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:22:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466692] Review Request: iml - Finds solutions to systems of linear equations over integers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466692 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:24:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 --- Comment #12 from Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:31:55 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/mpfi.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/mpfi-1.3.4-0.4.RC3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:43:16 EDT --- yes, if it's tagged + no cvs admin will see it. ;) Sorry for the delay... cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437192] Review Request: simdock - Fast and customizable dockbar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437192 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:41:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:45:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:49:36 EDT --- Shouldn't this not include the name Tetris in the description? See bug 238526 for some discussion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 465928] Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465928 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:47:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459881] Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459881 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:54:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 Adam Huffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |m) | --- Comment #45 from Adam Huffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:51:40 EDT --- Matt, thanks for responding. Just haven't had the time to fix this properly yet. I'll upload a new package and send the patch to you when it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466223] Review Request: perl-Sysadm-Install - Typical installation tasks for system administrators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:56:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204112] Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204112 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:59:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461699] Review Request: remoot - ReMoot is a remote control wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461699 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 18:58:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254016] Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 19:01:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254018] Review Request: rubygem-fastthread - optimized thread.rb replacement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254018 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 19:02:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 19:04:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254019] Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254019 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 19:03:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 291191] Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 Brendt Wohlberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 291191] Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 --- Comment #16 from Brendt Wohlberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 19:41:17 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: xgrep New Branches: EL-5 Owners: brendt I received a request from a user to maintain an addition branch for EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466223] Review Request: perl-Sysadm-Install - Typical installation tasks for system administrators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 --- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 19:41:15 EDT --- Built for Rawhide, F-9, and F-8: Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889572 F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889582 F-8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889596 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #35 from Tim Fenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 21:34:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pymol Short Description: python molecular graphics Owners: timfenn Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: timfenn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 Tim Fenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466692] Review Request: iml - Finds solutions to systems of linear equations over integers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466692 Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-19 21:59:27 EDT --- Built in rawhide [0], closing. [0]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889730 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467655] New: Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 Summary: Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/yafaray-0. 1.0-4.fc8.src.rpm OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Yaf(a)Ray 0.1.0 is a new raytracing render engine written from scratch, and it replaces YafRay 0.0.9. After two years of development, it already features a complete set of lighting and rendering options. http://wiki.yafray.org/bin/view.pl/UserDoc/YafaRay Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #40 from ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-20 00:18:51 EDT --- sorry, i was unable to access the page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
