[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 03:03:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) Are there so many japanese locales out there you can not use the full ja-FOO code? Because this test will trigger on any locale that contains ja (for example javanese, if fontconfig ever moves to iso639-2 or iso15924) No. maybe better testing jp or do you prefer ja-jp (or ja_jp? dunno) rather than that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #19 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 03:42:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) Now, getting ready to do steps 13 14 (make update) to push in to fedora updates for (F-8, F-9) and I have a question. Suds 0.3.2 is now GA. Should I (can I) follow the package update process now? Or, completely follow through with 0.3.1 and then update the package? Sure you can follow the package update process with 0.3.2. Just update your spec file, change the version and reset your spec release number, and commit all changes to cvs. Then new build. All old builds are still available for direct downloading from koji if somebody is interested. Also, does it matter when I close this ticket with NEXT RELEASE? You can let bodhi take care about this ticket, just add the bugzilla id in the 'New Update' form ( https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/ ). Or close the ticket now manually. At the just an appendix: Change your '- Add LICENSE to %doc.' to '- Add LICENSE to %%doc.' - no rpmlint warning -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 --- Comment #7 from Jameson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 03:47:13 EDT --- I have a new SPEC in original location, and a new SRPM: http://www.vtscrew.com/projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226317] Merge Review: procinfo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226317 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 03:47:05 EDT --- This is the review request for procinfo-info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 04:19:01 EDT --- If there is only one japanese locale by all means just test on ja-jp (without the contains bit). IIRC that was the locale format that worked for the Chinese people. However, as always with fontconfig, it's a good idea to test before pushing the rules on users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244389] Review Request: sugar-datastore - Sugar Datastore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244389 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244389] Review Request: sugar-datastore - Sugar Datastore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244389 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #9 from Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 06:09:12 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: sugar-datastore New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244373] Review Request: sugar-presence-service - Sugar presence service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244373 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #14 from Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 06:08:02 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: sugar-presence-service New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 343741] Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343741 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #11 from Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 06:00:51 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: sugar-base New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244371] Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244371 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #15 from Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 06:05:39 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: sugar New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #16 from David Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 09:00:26 EDT --- I'm been looking into the two issues you mentioned. Static libraries will be a quick fix. The license stuff may take a bit more thought. I've been so involved in the project I forgot about the issue of the SDK code. It's certainly not a significant part of the project. My options are to rip out the offending code (used mostly in the tests), or to get it approved as is. It is potentially useful as part of the distributed package as well. I'll keep you posted. - Dave -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470909] Review Request: wt - C++ library and application server for developing web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470909 --- Comment #2 from Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 09:54:29 EDT --- The description is too long, in my opinion. Going to cut it ASAP Please have a look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace You mean that the package name is too much generic/short? (webtoolkit would be better?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454959] Review Request: eclipse-cusp - Eclipse Common Lisp Development Tools (Cusp) plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454959 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Overholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 10:00:00 EDT --- I've put an updated specfile that builds for me here: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-cusp.spec There may be issues, but it's updated to put stuff in the right places :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471231] New: Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 Summary: Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/WebCalendar.spec SRPM URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/WebCalendar-1.2.0-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: WebCalendar is a PHP-based calendar application that can be configured as a single-user calendar, a multi-user calendar for groups of users, or as an event calendar viewable by visitors. MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, DB2, Interbase, MS SQL Server, or ODBC is required. WebCalendar can be setup in a variety of ways, such as... * A schedule management system for a single person * A schedule management system for a group of people, allowing one or more assistants to manage the calendar of another user * An events schedule that anyone can view, allowing visitors to submit new events * A calendar server that can be viewed with iCal-compliant calendar applications like Mozilla Sunbird, Apple iCal or GNOME Evolution or RSS-enabled applications like Firefox, Thunderbird, RSSOwl, or FeedDemon, or BlogExpress. Scratch koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=928527 rpmlint: spec file: silent srpm: silent rpm: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/settings.php /etc/WebCalendar/settings.php W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/site_extras.php /etc/WebCalendar/site_extras.php --- symlinks to configuration files. W: non-standard-gid /etc/WebCalendar/settings.php apache W: non-standard-gid /etc/WebCalendar apache E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/WebCalendar 0775 --- Configuration directory/file is created and initialized when WebCalendar is invoked via a browser for the first time. These settings are needed for this purpose. E: non-readable /etc/WebCalendar/settings.php 0660 --- configuration file that holds a password and therefore should not be publicly readable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 423631] Review Request: sugar-evince - evince package for OLPC, library for embedding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423631 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #9 from Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 06:32:55 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: sugar-evince New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: dsd mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:00:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) that comes to mind, is ACE (http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html) but it appears someone has some working fedora packages, it just has not been included: http://dist.bonsai.com/ken/ace_tao_rpm/SRC/5.6.6-1/. - This is bug 450164, however currently this one is blocked by license issue (see the discussion from bug 450164 comment 18) Also, perhaps OTL, which would be extremely simple to package: http://otl.sourceforge.net/ - This one does not seems to be in Fedora currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244377] Review Request: sugar-artwork - Artwork for Sugar look-and-feel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244377 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocks||462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:16:48 EDT --- All good! This package (projectM-jack) is APPROVED by oget Jameson, if you have time, could you review my package (Bug# 468765)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471243] New: Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 Summary: Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=323340) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323340) spec file for docbook5-schemas package Description of problem: Need review of docbook5-schemas package for Fedora. This package contains set of Norman Walsh's Docbook 5.X schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema). It is expected that the package will contain other Docbook 5.X schemas releases in future - so it uses for cycles even there is only one 5.0 Docbook 5 release at the moment. Zip-file of docbook 5.0 schemas could be downloaded from the address http://www.docbook.org/xml/5.0/docbook-5.0.zip Additional info: Basic rpmlint checks done, other docbook5 related review at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:21:55 EDT --- Rebuild failed on dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=928611 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470250] Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl - Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 --- Comment #4 from Ondrej Vasik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:22:42 EDT --- Just as a note, just added docbook5-schemas review request as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 , so both basic docbook5 packages should be submitted for review at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||org) --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:41:56 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||) --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:42:41 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||) --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:46:01 EDT --- ping again? By the way at least you have to write CVS admin request on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:43:58 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 423631] Review Request: sugar-evince - evince package for OLPC, library for embedding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423631 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:51:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:47:17 EDT --- Good to go. Just update the license information of the relevant packages, if there is need, whenever you get a reply from upstream. I guess we are done with projectM ( at least for now :) ) - This package (projectM-libvisual) is APPROVED by oget - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 343741] Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343741 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:54:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244373] Review Request: sugar-presence-service - Sugar presence service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244373 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:54:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:52:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244371] Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244371 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:55:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:52:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244389] Review Request: sugar-datastore - Sugar Datastore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244389 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:56:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244377] Review Request: sugar-artwork - Artwork for Sugar look-and-feel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244377 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:55:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244377] Review Request: sugar-artwork - Artwork for Sugar look-and-feel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244377 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #14 from Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 06:06:38 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: sugar-artwork New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469265] Review Request: pax-utils - PaX aware and related utilities for ELF binaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469265 Rafał Psota [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244373] Review Request: sugar-presence-service - Sugar presence service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244373 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 12:25:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) (In reply to comment #17) - I must say this srpm (tarball in this srpm) is problematic. Almost all codes in 2.8.1 tarball are still under GPLv2 (strict), however newly added tv_grab_ttx.pl is under GPLv3+, which are, unfortunately, incompatible: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPL_Compatibility_Matrix You need to fix license issue first. Upstream doesn't want to change the licenses and suggests to split out the Perl script because it is not essential for the main application and can also be used stand-alone. Is it possible/allowed to move it into a subpackage with a different license tag? As the Perl script is still an experimental feature I could also exclude it for now. This depends on how this perl script is related to the rest part of nxtvepg. If this perl script uses (i.e. depends on) the rest part of nxtvepg, then the license conflict cannot be resolved only by moving it into a subpackage and this script must be removed completely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244389] Review Request: sugar-datastore - Sugar Datastore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244389 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocks||462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244371] Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244371 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocks||462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for simple tcp based protocols such as http or smtp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 06:28:16 EDT --- I have found a example here. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8 fixed. http://ispbrasil.com.br/pen/pen.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/pen/pen-0.18.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 423631] Review Request: sugar-evince - evince package for OLPC, library for embedding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423631 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocks||462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444512] Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444512 Andrew Overholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 09:02:28 EDT --- Alex updated this for me and I apparently never uploaded it. Builds for me with 3.4 and matches new packaging guidelines for file locations: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~overholt/eclipse-eclemma.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~overholt/eclipse-eclemma-1.3.2-1.fc9.src.rpm There are some rpmlint warnings but I believe they're all waivable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||) --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 12:15:56 EDT --- If it seems difficult to package GPshell, would you try to do a pre-review of other person's review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #22 from Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 07:46:26 EDT --- Re-assigning this to nobody, iow throwing it back into the review queue, I'm done with this ticket, its a real shame as it would be really nice to get the secondlife client into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 --- Comment #13 from Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 06:04:32 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: sugar-toolkit New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #21 from Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 06:26:17 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: hulahop New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470531] Review Request: hunspell-cop - Coptic hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470531 Caolan McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocks||462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 423631] Review Request: sugar-evince - evince package for OLPC, library for embedding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423631 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 09:01:25 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244371] Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244371 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 13:17:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 13:19:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 13:26:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ Bug 464054 depends on bug 464049, which changed state. Bug 464049 Summary: Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 13:30:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470502] Review Request: kde-plasma-runcommand - Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470502 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 13:45:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 13:47:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435017] Review Request: ssm - coordinate superposition library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 13:55:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 13:25:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 --- Comment #4 from Paul F. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 13:59:29 EDT --- Ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - SMIME/CMS packages for Bouncy Castle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 13:57:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 13:57:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 --- Comment #2 from Simon Schampijer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 14:07:25 EDT --- new sources have been released http://kushaldas.in/tmp/Jukebox-4.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 --- Comment #5 from David Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 14:15:52 EDT --- oh when you said the next run I thought you meant another update was coming so I didn't look at it Generally I like this one, let's call it approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471275] New: Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471275 Summary: Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mod_scgi/mod_scgi.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mod_scgi/mod_scgi.spec Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=929133 Description: The SCGI protocol is a replacement for the Common Gateway Interface (CGI) protocol. It is a standard for applications to interface with HTTP servers. It is similar to FastCGI but is designed to be easier to implement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471275] Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471275 --- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 14:41:23 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mod_scgi/mod_scgi-1.13-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471275] Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471275 Lubomir Rintel [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 14:48:46 EDT --- Thanks for the package. Taking this for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471041] Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041 --- Comment #2 from Rafał Psota [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 14:01:52 EDT --- nonlogic.org is down. New links: Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.fedorapeople.org/review/diffpdf/diffpdf.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.fedorapeople.org/review/diffpdf/diffpdf-0.3.8-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244373] Review Request: sugar-presence-service - Sugar presence service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244373 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocks||462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 343741] Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343741 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 09:01:21 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 13:49:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - SMIME/CMS packages for Bouncy Castle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 16:10:55 EDT --- bouncycastle-mail-1.41-3.fc9,bouncycastle-1.41-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bouncycastle-mail-1.41-3.fc9,bouncycastle-1.41-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 --- Comment #14 from Tim Fenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 16:26:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) Rebuild failed on dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=928611 Added a patch to fix the build problems, tested on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=929474 new spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper.spec new srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper-2.0-17.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 16:28:51 EDT --- barry-0.14-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/barry-0.14-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 16:28:43 EDT --- barry-0.14-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/barry-0.14-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 16:28:47 EDT --- barry-0.14-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/barry-0.14-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 --- Comment #7 from Paul F. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 16:51:25 EDT --- I'll rebuild for tao in the morning and update that :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 Paul F. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Paul F. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 16:50:51 EDT --- Thanks :-) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libglfw Short Description: A portable OpenGL framework Owners: pfj Branches: devel, f9 InitialCC: pfj -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244377] Review Request: sugar-artwork - Artwork for Sugar look-and-feel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244377 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 17:08:20 EDT --- basket-1.0.3.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/basket-1.0.3.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 17:08:17 EDT --- basket-1.0.3.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/basket-1.0.3.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463768] Package review: perl-PAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463768 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alias||perl-PAR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 09:01:28 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471041] Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 17:41:34
EDT ---
After a fast look at the spec file, it looks good to me. If nobody is
interested in doing the review, I will do it.
You can convert two lines into one if you like...
mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}
install -m 755 diffpdf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}
- install -Dp -m 0755 %{name} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name}
but don't mix %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=929672
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 18:21:23 EDT --- xlcrack-1.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xlcrack-1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 18:21:26 EDT --- xlcrack-1.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xlcrack-1.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Chris Feist [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470424] Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470424 Tony Breeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Tony Breeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 19:15:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libtopology Short Description: CPU Topology library Owners: tbreeds Branches: F-9 F-10 EPEL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 Jameson [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jameson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 19:25:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: projectM-jack Short Description: projectM visualizations for JACK audio Owners: imntreal Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: imntreal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435017] Review Request: ssm - coordinate superposition library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017 --- Comment #16 from Tim Fenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 19:27:27 EDT --- cvs builds done, update request submitted to bodhi for F-9 and F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 --- Comment #9 from Jameson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 19:26:16 EDT --- Jameson, if you have time, could you review my package (Bug# 468765)? I'll start looking at it this week if no one else picks it up. That's actually one that I've been interested in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? Bug 462254 depends on bug 462253, which changed state. Bug 462253 Summary: Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 19:30:31 EDT --- Sorry for taking so long; I'd meant to pick up this review earlier but the Real Job has me busy lately :-) Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=929961 There are 2 missing BR's for tests, Test::Pod and Test::Pod::Coverage; both of these should be added as buildrequires. perl(Path::Class) appears twice in the requires, due to an explicit requires statement; this doesn't harm anything but I'd suggest dropping the explicit requires from the spec. The rpmlint warning you really can't do anything about :-) = perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-1.fc9.noarch.rpm = rpmlint perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap.noarch: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. provides for perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session::Store::FastMmap) = 0.05 perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap = 0.05-1.fc9 requires for perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Cache::FastMmap) = 1.13 perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session) = 0.09 perl(Catalyst::Utils) perl(File::Spec) perl(NEXT) perl(Path::Class) perl(Path::Class) perl(base) perl(strict) Source matches upstream: a5c28758a3a212fcc0f374110bc7855c Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05.tar.gz a5c28758a3a212fcc0f374110bc7855c Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05.tar.gz.srpm License (perl) is correct. Make the requires/buildrequires changes at the top of this review, and I'll approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 Jameson [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jameson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 19:27:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: projectM-libvisual Short Description: projectM visualizations through libvisual Owners: imntreal Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: imntreal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 Victor Bogado [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Victor Bogado [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 19:45:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: Cave9 Short Description: 3d game of cave exploration Owners: bogado Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 19:46:34 EDT --- projectM-pulseaudio-1.2.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/projectM-pulseaudio-1.2.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471335] New: Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 Summary: Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgdbus.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgdbus-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: libgdbus is a helper library for D-Bus integration with GLib. Koji scratch builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=930029 rpmlint output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpmlint libgdbus* libgdbus-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpmlint libgdbus* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This request based on the work which has be done in review marked as DEADREVIEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458698 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
