[Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 --- Comment #3 from Ant Bryan anthonybr...@gmail.com 2008-12-13 03:08:07 EDT --- Thanks for the comments, Jason. I will work on these issues with upstream. So, don't change the one thing rpmlint complains about? And yes, I do need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2008-12-13 03:07:19 EDT --- http://www.gnu-m68hc11.org/m68hc11_inst_ptc.php /me thinks, this page is obsolete, for 2 reasons: * the person listed as contact (Stephane C.), is the m68hc11/12 target's maintainer of the FSF toolchain. * Almost all packages referenced on this page are _way_ outdated. May-be you should contact him before proceeding with this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470325] Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(jussi.leht...@iki | |.fi)| --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2008-12-13 04:06:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) I would posit that this shouldn't go in until we can either get a shared library out of this or at least get some kind of upstream confirmation that you really can't build it that way. You can ship the static librar(y|ies), if you like, in a separate -static package. And the headers should go in a -devel package, as rpmlint dutifully complains. I have contacted upstream about this. It seems that the support to build shared libraries was added in version 2.1, but removed in 2.1.213 with libtool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466649] Review Request: adeona-0.2.1 - Stolen Laptop Tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466649 Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gia...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2008-12-13 04:06:46 EDT --- Fedora is trying to consolidate all packages that are using crypto stuff to use NSS. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation Can you double check if the program can support an alternate crypto library? if not, it would be nice if you could propose the change upstream (bonus points for providing them a patch :)) Apart from this, the spec is clean, maybe a bit too much :) since I can't see anything in the %files section... it also fails to build in much with: + make install DESTDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/adeona-0.2.1-2.fc10.x86_64 /builddir/build/BUILD/adeona/scripts/installadeona.sh ESC[HESC[2J mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/local/adeona' : Permission denied mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/local/adeona/resources' : No such file or directory mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/local/adeona/logs': No such file or directory mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/local/adeona/scripts': No such file or directory Could not create installation directory. Please check your permissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466649] Review Request: adeona-0.2.1 - Stolen Laptop Tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466649 --- Comment #3 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2008-12-13 04:07:24 EDT --- fails to build in _mock_... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470325] Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2008-12-13 04:13:18 EDT --- The lack of a shared library isn't the blocker (though it would be nice). The issue is, as tibbs says: You can ship the static librar(y|ies), if you like, in a separate -static package. And the headers should go in a -devel package, as rpmlint dutifully complains. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470325] Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2008-12-13 04:28:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) The lack of a shared library isn't the blocker (though it would be nice). The issue is, as tibbs says: You can ship the static librar(y|ies), if you like, in a separate -static package. And the headers should go in a -devel package, as rpmlint dutifully complains. Very well. In accordance with the Packaging Guidelines, I packaged everything in qd-devel, which provides qd-static. rpmlint output: qd-devel-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qd-devel.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qd-devel-2.3.7-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470325] Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325
--- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2008-12-13 04:52:09 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #4)
rpmlint output:
qd-devel-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
Add a line to the top of your spec:
%define debug_package %{nil}
(Since rpmbuild doesn't get useful debuginfo from static libs.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470325] Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2008-12-13 05:00:43 EDT --- Done. Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qd-devel.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qd-devel-2.3.7-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476346] New: Review Request: python-polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476346 Summary: Review Request: python-polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kon...@tylerc.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-polybori.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-polybori-0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: PolyBoRi is a special purpose computer algebra system for computations in Boolean Rings. The core is a C++ library, which provides high-level data types for Boolean polynomials and related structures. As a unique approach, binary decision diagrams are used as internal storage type for polynomial structures. On top of this, we provide a Python interface for parsing of complex polynomial systems, as well as for sophisticated and extendable strategies for Groebner base computation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476346] Review Request: python-polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476346 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2008-12-13 05:48:57 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996510 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476329] Review Request: cudd - CU Decision Diagram Package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476329 Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||476346 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476346] Review Request: python-polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476346 Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||476329 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2008-12-13 05:50:31 EDT --- Obviously (from scratch build) this depends on cudd. Adding blocker bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476324] Review Request: perl-URI-Find - Find URIs in plain text
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476324 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2008-12-13 05:54:42 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996047 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 339279e268cf37e629f54c1091f99a13 URI-Find-0.16.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=382, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr 0.01 sys + 0.09 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.22 CPU) + Package perl-URI-Find-0.16-1.fc11 = Provides: perl(URI::Find) = 0.16 perl(URI::Find::Schemeless) = 1.8 Requires: perl = 0:5.005 perl(Carp) perl(URI) perl(URI::Find) perl(URI::URL) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474818] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2008-12-13 05:56:46 EDT --- build failed because of missing BR perl(Test::More) Can't locate Test/More.pm See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996515 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 Xavier Lamien lxt...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lxt...@gmail.com --- Comment #24 from Xavier Lamien lxt...@gmail.com 2008-12-13 06:01:52 EDT --- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476350] New: Review Request: python-networkx - Creates and Manipulates Graphs and Networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-networkx - Creates and Manipulates Graphs and Networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476350 Summary: Review Request: python-networkx - Creates and Manipulates Graphs and Networks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kon...@tylerc.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-networkx.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-networkx-0.99-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: NetworkX is a Python package for the creation, manipulation, and study of the structure, dynamics, and functions of complex networks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476350] Review Request: python-networkx - Creates and Manipulates Graphs and Networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476350 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2008-12-13 07:29:20 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996538 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476351] New: Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476351 Summary: Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kon...@tylerc.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/palp.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/palp-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: PALP contains routines for vertex and facet enumeration, computation of incidences and symmetries, as well as completion of the set of lattice points in the convex hull of a given set of points. In addition, there are procedures specialised to reflexive polytopes such as the enumeration of reflexive subpolytopes, and applications to toric geometry and string theory, like the computation of Hodge data and fibration structures for toric Calabi-Yau varieties. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476351] Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476351 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2008-12-13 07:50:49 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996541 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for simple tcp based protocols such as http or smtp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2008-12-13
08:59:08 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: F9/i386
[x] Rpmlint output:
Source RPM:
[...@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint pen-0.18.0-2.fc10.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Binary RPM(s):
[...@laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint pen*
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[X] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPLv2
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
Upstream source:
96f6d39e7e7cca11a647e795550f3829 pen-0.18.0.tar.gz
Build source:
96f6d39e7e7cca11a647e795550f3829 pen-0.18.0.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales.
[x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every
%files section.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[x] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Timestamps preserved with cp and install.
[x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags})
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: F9/i386
[x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported
architectures.
Tested on:
[x] F10/i386
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996602
[-] Package functions as described.
[!] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[x] Changelog in allowed format
Some remarks:
- Don't mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS
- You should report upstream about the missing pen.conf in the release tarball.
- What's about a restart of apache after the installation?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 476357] New: Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 Summary: Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: musur...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/libicns.spec SRPM URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/libicns-0.6.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: libicns is a library providing functionality for easily reading and writing Macintosh icns files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 --- Comment #5 from Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info 2008-12-13 09:27:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) * - summary should not start with A or An fixed Really? I still see Summary: A enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot ;-) * - Remove the *.la files. They should not be included. as you can see in the -4 spec, I manually remove it but have provisions in place to build a -static subpackage. I think just removing is better in this case but would like comments. Removing definitely is better. Static subpackages are hightly discouraged in Fedora; see packaging guidelines for details. (quoting from the spec or rpmlint) * License: GPLv2 Looks more like GPLv2+ to me (or did I miss something?). * Requires: gdbm Why is that needed? RPM automatically adds a requires for libgdbm.so.2(), hence please remove it if there there are no good reason for it. * $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/jpilot-backup-* jpilot-backup-0.53-4.fc10.src.rpm jpilot-backup.src: W: strange-permission jpilot-backup.spec 0600 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Please fix * looks good apart from the above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 --- Comment #1 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com 2008-12-13 09:35:39 EDT --- I also need a sponsor . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476359] New: Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: leigh123li...@googlemail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/compiz-fusion-unsupported.spec SRPM URL: http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/compiz-fusion-unsupported-0.7.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package contains additional plugins from the Compiz Fusion Project -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476360] New: Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dpie...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-tlsmail.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-tlsmail-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls by dynamically replacing these classes to these in ruby 1.9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475884] Review Request: gbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475884 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 09:54:25 EDT --- gbdfed-1.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475884] Review Request: gbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475884 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474908] Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 09:55:44 EDT --- qle-0.0.10-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467489] Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 09:55:57 EDT --- nwsclient-1.6.3-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 09:54:13 EDT --- ibp-0.21-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 09:56:31 EDT --- laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474908] Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 09:54:33 EDT --- xmms2-0.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467489] Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473222] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File - File storage backend for session data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473222 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 09:55:19 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File-0.13-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 09:55:11 EDT --- guiloader-2.12.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update guiloader'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11197 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 09:57:46 EDT --- laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 09:58:18 EDT --- ibp-0.21-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 09:57:17 EDT --- qle-0.0.10-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 09:59:51 EDT --- xmbdfed-4.7-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 10:00:19 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 10:00:01 EDT --- xmbdfed-4.7-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467489] Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 10:05:24 EDT --- nwsclient-1.6.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474908] Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 10:05:01 EDT --- xmms2-0.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473218] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473218 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 10:02:20 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl-1.00-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 10:08:17 EDT --- ibp-0.21-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475884] Review Request: gbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475884 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 10:08:42 EDT --- gbdfed-1.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 10:06:04 EDT --- projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473218] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473218 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 10:04:26 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl-1.00-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 10:03:29 EDT --- qle-0.0.10-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 10:02:04 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473222] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File - File storage backend for session data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473222 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-13 10:02:28 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File-0.13-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466649] Review Request: adeona-0.2.1 - Stolen Laptop Tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466649 David Nalley da...@gnsa.us changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2008-12-13 11:22:06 EDT --- Gianluca - It appears that upstream has abandoned this project as OpenDHT has essentially been abandoned as well. They claim that they will start a new project to work around OpenDHT but they haven't released any code for this project. I should have closed this ticket a while ago. I apologize, I should have been more proactive in closing this ticket. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934 --- Comment #8 from Brennan Ashton bash...@brennanashton.com 2008-12-13 11:38:23 EDT --- Yes, I have seen people using the 4.3 gcc, so I am working on building that right now. I will do some tests on actual hardware to verify. That other project has gone though states of being maintained and not it looks like, and many of the important links are broken. Right now I am having issues with getting gcc to compile, there has been some change in the Fedora gcc, and it has broken even the good avr-gcc package building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com 2008-12-13 11:46:51 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, somehow I missed your updates. This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229
Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-13
12:21:48 EDT ---
Some notes:
* BuildRequires/Requires
- build.log shows
80 Failed to import numarray: PyQwt will be build without support for
numarray.
81 Failed to find Numeric2: PyQwt will be build without support for
Numeric.
.
86 'disable_numarray': False,
87 'disable_numeric': False,
88 'disable_numpy': False,
These message seems contradictory.
Perhaps BuildRequires: python-numarray python-numeric
is needed.
- Also please check if numpy (or python-numarray, python-numeric)
are also needed for Requires (not BuildRequires).
For python module related packages, writing a package in
BuildRequires does not mean that the package is installed
at runtime.
- And check if PyQwt-devel does not require qwt-devel.
For example, QwtList.sip contains:
-
34 %MappedType QListQwtPickerMachine::Command
35 {
36 %TypeHeaderCode
37 #include qlist.h
38 #include qwt_picker_machine.h
39 %End
-
* Timestamps
- 'INSTALL=install -p' argument to make install does not
make sense for this package because this makefile is not
based on autotools but based on python
(actually when installing files cp -f is used)
* Permission of scripts
-
# non-executable script
chmod 755 %{buildroot}%{python_sitearch}/PyQt4/Qwt5/grace.py
-
- If this script is not meant to be called directly by
users (but is meant to be called internally from programs
or so), then this script should not have executable
permission and the shebang should be removed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 Jan ONDREJ ondr...@salstar.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Jan ONDREJ ondr...@salstar.sk 2008-12-13 12:48:57 EDT --- Thanks to you. :) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: bandwidthd Short Description: Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs Owners: ondrejj Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-13 13:28:39 EDT --- Some notes * Versioning - As this does not seem to be a pre-release of version 1.3.2, you should not use 0. for release number. * License - For this package the license tag must be LGPLv2+ * BuildRequires/Requires - Please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires ! Timestamp - Preserving the original timestamp on jcalendar-license.txt is preferred. * Directory ownership issue - This package should not own %_javadir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897
Charles R. Anderson c...@wpi.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo?(c...@wpi.edu) |
--- Comment #14 from Charles R. Anderson c...@wpi.edu 2008-12-13 13:35:56
EDT ---
Spec URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/Judy/Judy.spec
SRPM URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/Judy/Judy-1.0.4-4.fc10.src.rpm
Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996794
* Sat Dec 13 2008 Charles R. Anderson c...@wpi.edu 1.0.4-4
- for Judy1 man page fix, patch Makefile.{am,in} instead of
relying on autotools to regenerate the latter.
- Add README.Fedora with upstream's license explanation.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-13 13:45:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) ! Timestamp - Preserving the original timestamp on jcalendar-license.txt is preferred. like... sed -i -e 's|\r||' jcalendar-license.txt tmp touch -r jcalendar-license.txt tmp mv -f tmp jcalendar-license.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225798] Merge Review: gimp-help
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225798 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil orcanba...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil orcanba...@yahoo.com 2008-12-13 14:11:01 EDT --- Package is in rawhide. We can close the bug now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil orcanba...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||orcanba...@yahoo.com --- Comment #23 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil orcanba...@yahoo.com 2008-12-13 14:08:18 EDT --- re-ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com 2008-12-13 14:39:08 EDT --- All right, looks good now. Approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476374] New: Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Summary: Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: henrique...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/oasa/0.12.5/oasa.spec SRPM URL: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/oasa/0.12.5/oasa-0.12.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: OASA is a python library that handles chemical formats. OASA is, also, a dependency for the BKChem package (Bug 452413) that is, too, in approval process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(leigh123li...@goo | |glemail.com)| --- Comment #24 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com 2008-12-13 14:42:23 EDT --- I haven't had time to do any work on dpkg lately , I hope to get some free time in the new year . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #21 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2008-12-13 14:50:59 EDT --- Here we go. BKChem worked perfectly with python-pmw from fedora. OASA is now on a separate package awaiting to be reviewed (Bug 476374) and all the tests with this new release of BKChem (using pithon-pmw and the new package of OASA) are going OK. SPEC: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/bkchem.spec SRPM: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/bkchem-0.12.5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476324] Review Request: perl-URI-Find - Find URIs in plain text
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476324 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476351] Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476351 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jkeat...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jkeat...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review?, ||needinfo?(kon...@tylerc.org ||) --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com 2008-12-13 15:03:32 EDT --- * Name fine * Summary/description OK * Group OK * Source matches upstream * Buildroot sane * Make uses smp flags * Install has clean * Consistent use of macros * %clean section OK * defatter exists * Changelog sane * Build in mock for rawhide * rpmlint is silent * License is not OK Source refers to http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html as it's license, which is now version 3, so I do believe the license needs to be GPLv3+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476324] Review Request: perl-URI-Find - Find URIs in plain text
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476324 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2008-12-13 15:02:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-URI-Find Short Description: Find URIs in plain text Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476351] Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476351 Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(kon...@tylerc.org | |) | --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2008-12-13 15:17:34 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/palp.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/palp-1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476351] Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476351 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com 2008-12-13 16:03:05 EDT --- Looks good to me! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476351] Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476351 Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2008-12-13 16:10:49 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: palp Short Description: A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476374] Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jkeat...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jkeat...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com 2008-12-13 16:08:01 EDT --- Taking review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476374] Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(henrique...@gmail ||.com) --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com 2008-12-13 16:20:42 EDT --- * Python defines correct * Name not correct. This is a python module, and should be named python-oasa. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 * Licensing not correct. Header files have 'or any later version' in them, therefore license should be GPLV2+ oasa/elements.py - No license header oasa/subsearch_data.py - No license header oasa/tests.py - No license header oasa/graph/multi_thread.py - No license header * Summary could drop the OASA is a * URL is OK * Source matches upstream * Buildroot fine * Requires on python is redundant, don't put that in. * Description is OKish. * Consistent macro usage * Correct cleaning at %install * Good %clean section * defatters in %files * %files is a bit broad. I'd rather see something more like http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#Byte_Compiled_Files * changelog should have a revision listed. * rpmlint output: oasa.noarch: W: no-documentation oasa.noarch: E: description-line-too-long OASA is a free python library for manipulating and analyzing chemical structures. oasa.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.12.5 ['0.12.5-1.fc11', '0.12.5-1'] oasa.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 3) ** SUMMARY ** Fix license, report unlicensed files to upstream Fix name Fix summary Fix Requires Potentially fix %files Fix rpmlint output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jkeat...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jkeat...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com 2008-12-13 16:28:01 EDT --- Taking review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461619] Review Request: system-switch-displaymanager - A display manager switcher for GDM, KDM, XDM and WDM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461619 Ngo Than t...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #13 from Ngo Than t...@redhat.com 2008-12-13 16:36:25 EDT --- it's build in f9/f10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||needinfo?(rakesh.pan...@gma ||il.com) --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com 2008-12-13 16:49:53 EDT --- * python define correct * Name/Summary/Group/URL all correct * Buildroot def is fine * Builds Ok in mock * License is wrong, there are multiple licenses in this package, due to various image files. BSD 3-clause, Eclipse Public License, LGPL, GPLv2 Many files in enthought/traits/protocols/ have no license headers, and are in fact from a different project, PyProtocols Many files in enthought/traits/tests/ have no license headers enthought/traits/ui/editors_gen.py is licensed under GPLv2(thus +) MANY things in examples/ have no license information Most things in integrationtests/ have no license information * buildroot is sane * %prep,%build,%files,%clean all seem fine * %files OK * changelog OK * rpmlint output: python-Traits.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/enthought/traits/ctraits.so 0775 python-Traits.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/enthought/traits/protocols/_speedups.so 0775 ** SUMMARY ** This needs a close examination of the licenses of the files and a correct License field. Permissions need to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jkeat...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jkeat...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com 2008-12-13 16:59:48 EDT --- Taking review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2008-12-13 17:00:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) 1/ during the rpmbuild the warnings about file listed twice http://rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html 2/ rear.spec not in correct permission mode Use chmod to switch the permission before you use rpmbuild locally, then the warning will go away. One remark... - leave contrib in %doc away. On a RPM based system it's not interesting how to build stuff for a gentoo system. Did you find a sponsor in the meantime? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(lmac...@redhat.co ||m) --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com 2008-12-13 17:07:46 EDT --- * Python define good * Source0 is a 404 * Commented out %doc isn't likely commented out. You need %%doc * MANY files lack license header info * PKG-INFO lists the license as UNKNOWN, there is no fallback for unlicensed files. * Some files are licensed under MIT /and/ GPL * rpmlint output: python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: no-documentation python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/css/flexigrid/images/._fhbg.gif python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/css/flexigrid/._ie.css python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/css/flexigrid/._images python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/css/flexigrid/images/._wbg.gif python-tw-jquery.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/javascript/validate/demo/captcha/images/.htaccess python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/css/flexigrid/._flexigrid.css 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. ** SUMMARY ** Needs a license audit. Needs an updates Source rpmlint issues need accounting for or fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmx.de 2008-12-13 17:24:00 EDT --- Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-py.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-py-0.9.2-5.fc10.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Dec 12 2008 Thomas Moschny .. - 0.9.2-5 - Add patch from trunk fixing a subversion 1.5 problem (pylib issue66). - Don't replace doctest compat module (pylib issue67). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476385] New: Review Request: pycrypto - The Python Cryptography Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pycrypto - The Python Cryptography Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476385 Summary: Review Request: pycrypto - The Python Cryptography Toolkit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kon...@tylerc.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/pycrypto.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/pycrypto-2.0.1-1.20081213git510428c.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a collection of both secure hash functions (such as MD5 and SHA), and various encryption algorithms (AES, DES, IDEA, RSA, ElGamal, etc.). The package is structured to make adding new modules easy. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996990 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476386] New: Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 Summary: Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoo...@yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-verilog.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-verilog-3.044-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package provides functions to support writing utilities that use the Verilog language. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476374] Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(henrique...@gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #3 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2008-12-13 18:08:42 EDT --- Hello, Jesse, thanks for reviewing the package. * Fix license, report unlicensed files to upstream - DONE and I already warned Beda about the files without license. * Fix name - DONE * Fix summary - DONE * Fix Requires - DONE * Potentially fix %files - I still have little experience in packaging, I hope I have done correctly this time. * Fix rpmlint output - rpmlint is no longer showing any errors. SPEC - http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/oasa/0.12.5/python-oasa.spec SRPM - http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/oasa/0.12.5/python-oasa-0.12.5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476387] New: Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 Summary: Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoo...@yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/vhd2vl.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/vhd2vl-2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: vhd2vl is a VHDL to Verilog translation program. It targets the translation of synthetisable RTL. While far from complete it supports a useful subset of VHDL, sufficient for complex designs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@tummy.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-13 18:53:06 EDT --- I'd be happy to review this and sponsor you... look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-13 19:13:25 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: cbba81a5b47b811dafd897cd7bd72dee usbmon-5.2.tar.gz cbba81a5b47b811dafd897cd7bd72dee usbmon-5.2.tar.gz.orig See below - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: A few general comments, unrelated to the packaging and thus moot for the review, but I thought I would mention them: - You have your upstream url as your people.redhat.com page. Perhaps it would be good to use a fedorahosted.org site for this? That way you get bug tracking/mailing lists/vcs repo, etc. See: https://fedorahosted.org/web/new - You might add a note about the license version to the .c file. No big deal since it's mentioned other places and is clearly your intent, but just to be paranoid. ;) Now, on to issues about the package: 1. I have no idea on the ExcludeArch. Does s390 have usb? In any case it's not a blocker here as Fedora doesn't have s390 as a primary arch. You might ask the s390 list? I don't see any other blockers here, this is a very simple package, and is APPROVED. Go ahead and continue the process from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account If you have any questions don't hesitate to contact me via bugzilla, email, or on irc (nirik on freenode). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||476374 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476374] Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Blocks||177841, 452413 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476385] Review Request: pycrypto - The Python Cryptography Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476385 Mads Kiilerich m...@kiilerich.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@kiilerich.com --- Comment #1 from Mads Kiilerich m...@kiilerich.com 2008-12-13 21:08:27 EDT --- This is already packaged in the python-crypto package. The upstream project has just moved from amk.ca to dlitz.net. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476385] Review Request: pycrypto - The Python Cryptography Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476385 Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2008-12-13 21:25:52 EDT --- Ah, thanks. Closing then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #17 from Jerry Amundson jamun...@gmail.com 2008-12-13 21:52:01 EDT --- [r...@walnut ~]# rpm -Uvh --test ~jerry/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/samba4-common-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386.rpm ~jerry/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/samba4-client-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386.rpm ~jerry/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/samba4-winbind-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386.rpm ~jerry/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/samba4-libs-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386.rpm ~jerry/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/samba4-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386.rpm Preparing...### [100%] file /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 from install of samba4-winbind-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386 conflicts with file from package samba-winbind-0:3.2.5-0.23.fc11.i386 file /usr/bin/ntlm_auth from install of samba4-winbind-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386 conflicts with file from package samba-winbind-0:3.2.5-0.23.fc11.i386 file /usr/bin/wbinfo from install of samba4-winbind-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386 conflicts with file from package samba-winbind-0:3.2.5-0.23.fc11.i386 file /usr/lib/libnss_winbind.so from install of samba4-winbind-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386 conflicts with file from package samba-winbind-0:3.2.5-0.23.fc11.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-13 22:03:13 EDT --- There are some missing BR: + /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor 'CP=/bin/cp -p' PREFIX=/usr %Error: 'flex' must be installed to build %Error: 'bison' must be installed to build %Error: Exiting due to above missing dependencies. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pdWnhE (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pdWnhE (%build) And according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing the license tag should be either Artistic(clarified) or Artistic 2.0, just Artistic is not valid. At the first glance, you should use Artistic(clarified) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-13 22:42:54 EDT --- please either use parallel build or make a note about it being non-functional in the spec. Anyway, mock build fails: + /usr/bin/make -C src make: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/vhd2vl/src' flex -i vhd2vl.l bison -d -v -t vhd2vl.y gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -m tune=generic -O -g -o vhd2vl lex.yy.c vhd2vl.tab.c -lfl lex.yy.c: In function 'yylex': vhd2vl.l:144: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result vhd2vl.l: At top level: lex.yy.c:1670: warning: 'yyunput' defined but not used lex.yy.c:1713: warning: 'input' defined but not used vhd2vl.y: In function 'yyparse': vhd2vl.y:850: error: expected ';' before '}' token vhd2vl.y:851: error: expected ';' before '}' token vhd2vl.y:1389: error: expected ';' before '}' token make: *** [vhd2vl] Error 1 make: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/vhd2vl/src' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14SfcI (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14SfcI (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #18 from Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com 2008-12-13 23:14:35 EDT --- Yeah, not sure what to do about the library. File conflicts in other samba4 subpackages were all binaries, which I resolved by simply appending a '4' to the name. Ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
