[Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-29 02:02:09 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1327573 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 78d560ad4fb67cb8ceb0d84c4de40ed0 App-Nopaste-0.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=8, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.17 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.23 CPU) + Package perl-App-Nopaste-0.10-1.fc12.noarch = Provides: perl(App::Nopaste) = 0.10 perl(App::Nopaste::Command) perl(App::Nopaste::Service) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Gist) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Husk) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Mathbin) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::PastebinCom) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Pastie) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Rafb) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Shadowcat) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Snitch) Requires: /usr/bin/env perl(App::Nopaste) perl(App::Nopaste::Command) perl(Module::Pluggable) perl(Moose) perl(WWW::Mechanize) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestion: 1) you don't need following # autoreq doesn't catch this Requires: perl(MooseX::Getopt) # necessary for optional modules Requires: perl(Clipboard) Requires: perl(Config::INI::Reader) Requires: perl(Git) Requires: perl(WWW::Pastebin::PastebinCom::Create) Requires: perl(WWW::Pastebin::RafbNet::Create) Remove them and then import new SRPM. I see yum auto processed all these Requires APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jan.kle...@hp.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-04-29 02:05:16 EDT --- requires seems reasonable for me, I have compared it with modules which are used in Daemon.pm and it fits. Ok, i didn't find anything wrong (except that Log::Log4perl is required two times in source code, but this imho doesn't affect runtime) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226483] Merge Review: tcsh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226483
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-29 02:04:43
EDT ---
- Time stamps are not conserved.
for i in Fixes WishList; do
iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 $i ${i}_
mv ${i}_ $i
done
should be
for i in Fixes WishList; do
iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 $i ${i}_ \
touch -r $i ${i}_ \
mv ${i}_ $i
done
- Defattr should be
(-,root,root,-)
not
(-,root,root)
Fix these before building the new release. The package has been
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-29 02:11:18 EDT --- jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-29 02:11:41 EDT --- jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-29 02:10:33 EDT --- jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 --- Comment #2 from Silas Sewell si...@sewell.ch 2009-04-29 02:16:54 EDT --- 1). Updated Source0 to match tar.gz found in the source rpm. [si...@silas ~]$ curl --silent http://cloud.github.com/downloads/silas/funcshell/funcshell-0.0.1.tar.gz | md5sum 1c4ffd7be2aee86743b5aa5f64cc7971 - 2). I maintain other packages: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/silas Just a quick clarification, when I say I am the creator of this package I mean I wrote funcshell (my original wording was somewhat ambiguous). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-29 02:24:11 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-29 02:24:16 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-29 02:24:06 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-29 02:30:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1327590 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM tucan.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency librsvg2 == looks false message + source files match upstream url 21cc03fe952da8a0ae44ba66956a0766 tucan-0.3.6.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + tucan desktop file installed correctly. + GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #13 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-04-29 02:36:59 EDT --- Hi Arthur, I will take a look at your latest package during today/tommorow. For informal package review, you should follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process Just pickup any review request which is not yet assigned and perform review (for example, you could do review on this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759, please be aware that there are specific checks for perl/python/php packages http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Application_Specific_Guidelines ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-04-29 02:39:52 EDT --- ???!!?!?! Without those explicit requires in the spec, I get an rpm that doesn't require any of those packages and results in a broken installation - MooseX-Getopt is absolutely required - the nopaste command definitely doesn't work without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-04-29 02:41:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-App-Daemon Short Description: Start an Application as a Daemon Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-04-29 02:39:44 EDT --- @tom : thanks for this. I will work on a build whithout hsieh_hash.c (I don't understand what you mean about %pre, should be deleted in %prep and Makefile patched to not try to use it) Rehards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-29 02:47:11 EDT --- python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-29 02:46:13 EDT --- python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017
--- Comment #19 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2009-04-29 02:56:51
EDT ---
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common.spec
SRPM URL:
http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common-7.3-4.20090428cvs.fc11.src.rpm
* License
- Removing file in %prep
- Notified upstream
* CVS directory
- Removing in %prep
* Comments
- Removed (no copy-paste but sort of backup during the last edit...simply
forgot to remove them before uploading)
* Multilue jar files (including symlink)
- Done.
! Using xargs
- Done.
! About creating many symlinks manually
- Great input, thanks. Done.
! use %{_javadir}/%{name}-*.jar in %files
- Done.
FYI: Right now, there's still some stuff from 7.3-3 in 7.3-4 but commented, in
case there's a problem with the new changes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497720] Review Request: hunspell-ln - Lingala hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497720 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497827] Review Request: shortrpm - Short-circuit binary RPM package build
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497827 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-04-29 03:24:07 EDT --- Hm, testsuite was failing since %a seems to be ignored with most recent glibcs even when the source is not an ISO C source, contrary to what was documented. The package was updated to 1.1, imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-29 03:35:13 EDT --- Argh! my bad. I forgot to remove them from SPEC while testing and installing this package locally. Please add Requires: back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |gssapi-error - Globus |globus-gssapi-error - |Toolkit - GSSAPI Error |Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI |Library |Error Library --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-04-29 03:35:29 EDT --- The upstream name of this package (gssapi-error) fails the to common name rule. Therefore I have changed it to have the globus- prefix like all the other globus packages. Patch for this is submitted upstream. New version: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gssapi-error-2.5-2.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gssapi-error.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-04-29 03:39:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-App-Nopaste Short Description: Easy access to any pastebin Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-29 04:03:27 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2009-04-29 04:06:44 EDT --- Thanks. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-MIME-Charset Short Description: Charset Informations for MIME Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Ramakrishna Reddy ramkr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #7 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-04-29 04:09:33 EDT --- Response from Brian Thanks for the heads up. I'll look into adding a configure switch to disable it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497991] Review Request: hunspell-as - Assamese hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497991 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-29 04:14:45 EDT --- Built for F-11 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494819] Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494819 Ramakrishna Reddy ramkr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495021] Review Request: python-posix_ipc - POSIX IPC primitives for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495021 Ramakrishna Reddy ramkr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494853] Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494853 Ramakrishna Reddy ramkr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-29 04:47:41 EDT --- globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-29 04:47:33 EDT --- globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-04-29 05:27:38 EDT --- Do you still need BuildRequires: doxygen? Anyway, that you can check post-review. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498029] Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498029 --- Comment #2 from Jiri Reischig jiri.reisc...@ecn.cz 2009-04-29 06:05:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) I try compile and install the package and it's working good. Thank you very much. I hope that the package will be included in the next Fedora version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch Bug 453857 depends on bug 453850, which changed state. Bug 453850 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Bug 453857 depends on bug 453853, which changed state. Bug 453853 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-04-29 06:02:24 EDT --- Sources match upstream: $ diff -urN globus_gsi_sysconfig-2.2/ globus_gsi_sysconfig-2.2-dl/ is silent. Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328247 $ rpmlint globus-gsi-sysconfig*.rpm globus-gsi-sysconfig-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498029] Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498029 --- Comment #3 from Jiri Reischig jiri.reisc...@ecn.cz 2009-04-29 06:10:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) Please, do you know how can I insert to the KDE new CA key or site selfsigned key which will be acepted in this kio-ftps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-29 06:11:52 EDT --- thank you for your review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: tucan Short Description: Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-04-29
06:08:12 EDT ---
Fedora review globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-29
+ OK
! needs attention
+ rpmlint output
See above; the no documentation warning can be ignored.
+ Package is named according to Fedora Package Naming Guidelines
+ Specfile name matches the package base name
+ Package follows the Fedora packaging guidelines
+ License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
ASL 2.0
+ License matches the actual package license
+ The package contains the license file
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match sources in the srpm
the source repacking makes it impossible to compare md5sum's, thus:
$ diff -urN globus_gsi_sysconfig-2.2/ globus_gsi_sysconfig-2.2-dl/
reports no differences
+ Package scratch-builds
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
+ binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun
+ Does not use Prefix: /usr
+ Package owns all directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ %files has %defattr
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Consistent use of macros
+ Package must contain code or permissible content
+ Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
n/a Files marked %doc should not affect package
+ Header files should be in -devel
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
+ Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
indirectly, via R: globus-core
+ libfoo.so must go in -devel
+ -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ Packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Filenames must be valid UTF-8
APPROVED by sailer.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-04-29 06:15:37 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-plotmm Short Description: MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-04-29 06:16:19 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-libsqlite3x Short Description: MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226108] Merge Review: lsof
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226108 Karel Zak k...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(k...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #8 from Karel Zak k...@redhat.com 2009-04-29 06:21:19 EDT --- Michal, thanks for your review. I'll fix all in the next rawhide update (probably together with some others issues). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #22 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-04-29
06:21:57 EDT ---
soci-3.0.0-5.fc10.src.rpm
APPROVED
So you can squash remaining issues in pkg cvs, which will be more convenient
than going through the upload-bugzilla-review cycle.
[...]
With a caveat, though, as the conditional build options don't seem to work
[yet]:
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-backend-empty,
--disable-backend-sqlite3
And although it recognises the other --disable-backend options, it ignores them
and still builds various backends if the needed -devel pkgs are installed. E.g.
--without mysql ends with RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/include/soci/backends/mysql/soci-mysql.h
/usr/lib/libsoci_mysql.so
/usr/lib/libsoci_mysql.so.3
/usr/lib/libsoci_mysql.so.3.0.0
Unless you can disable the backends at configure-time, you could add
BuildConflicts: mysql-devel to enforce uninstalling unwanted -devel pkgs. ;o)
[...]
%define mydocs __tmp_docdir
Not used anywhere.
* The many %{?with_foo:...} switches throughout the spec file could be grouped
together and could be replaced with a much more readable %if/%endif block that
covers everything for each conditional subpkg except the %build/%install
sections. In other words, for e.g. MySQL you would end up with:
%if %{with mysql}
%package mysql
...
%description mysql
...
%files mysql
...
%post mysql -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun mysql -p /sbin/ldconfig
...
%package mysql-devel
...
%description mysql-devel
...
%files mysql-devel
...
%endif
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch Bug 453856 depends on bug 453850, which changed state. Bug 453850 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Bug 453856 depends on bug 453853, which changed state. Bug 453853 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-04-29 06:19:36 EDT --- Sources match upstream: 48987f39031ac79949a9b0913aa42c67 ORIG/globus_gsi_cert_utils-5.5.tar.gz 48987f39031ac79949a9b0913aa42c67 SOURCES/globus_gsi_cert_utils-5.5.tar.gz $ rpmlint globus-gsi-cert-utils*.rpm globus-gsi-cert-utils.spec globus-gsi-cert-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gsi-cert-utils-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gsi-cert-utils-progs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-04-29
06:25:10 EDT ---
Fedora review globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-29
+ OK
! needs attention
+ rpmlint output
See above; the no documentation warning can be ignored. Source Tarball does
not contain a license file
+ Package is named according to Fedora Package Naming Guidelines
+ Specfile name matches the package base name
+ Package follows the Fedora packaging guidelines
+ License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
ASL 2.0
+ License matches the actual package license
n/a The package contains the license file
none shipped by upstream tarball
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match sources in the srpm
48987f39031ac79949a9b0913aa42c67 ORIG/globus_gsi_cert_utils-5.5.tar.gz
48987f39031ac79949a9b0913aa42c67 SOURCES/globus_gsi_cert_utils-5.5.tar.gz
+ Package scratch-builds
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
+ binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun
+ Does not use Prefix: /usr
+ Package owns all directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ %files has %defattr
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Consistent use of macros
+ Package must contain code or permissible content
+ Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
n/a Files marked %doc should not affect package
+ Header files should be in -devel
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
+ Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
indirectly, via R: globus-core
+ libfoo.so must go in -devel
+ -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ Packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Filenames must be valid UTF-8
APPROVED by sailer.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-04-29 06:43:00 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: globus-gsi-cert-utils Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-04-29 06:43:03 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: globus-gsi-sysconfig Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497807] Review Request: perl-Capture-Tiny - Capture stdin or stdout from Perl, XS or external programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497807 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498186] New: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier - beautifier for javascript
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier - beautifier for javascript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498186 Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier - beautifier for javascript Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Beautifier.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Beautifier-0.04-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module is mostly a Perl-rewrite of http://github.com/einars/js- beautify/tree/master/beautify.js http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328326 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi
--- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-29 07:43:05
EDT ---
A few notes:
- .la files need to be removed, add
find . -name *.la -exec rm {} \;
to the end of the install phase
- if possible, static library build should be disable (usually %configure
--disable-static)
- devel package needs to Requires: pkgconfig
- you're running autoreconf, but not BRing the packages = the package will not
build in mock. Autoreconf'ing is frowned upon, and should not be done unless it
is specifically necessary.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498188] New: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498188 Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Minifier.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Minifier-1.05-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module removes unnecessary whitespace from JavaScript code. The primary requirement developing this module is to not break working code: if working JavaScript is in input then working JavaScript is output. It is ok if the input has missing semi-colons, snips like '++ +' or '12 .toString()', for example. Internet Explorer conditional comments are copied to the output but the code inside these comments will not be minified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498188] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498188 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||498189 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524
Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-04-29
07:57:15 EDT ---
Fedora review jorbis-0.0.17-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-29
rpmlint output:
[ell...@ellert jorbis]$ rpmlint 1256512409979681881233819/result/jorbis/*.rpm
jorbis.spec
jorbis.src:156: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %dir
%{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
jorbis.src:157: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package)
%{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.jar.*
jorbis.src:170: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package player
%{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-player*.jar.*
jorbis.src:178: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package comment
%{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-comment*.jar.*
jorbis.spec:156: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %dir
%{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
jorbis.spec:157: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package)
%{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.jar.*
jorbis.spec:170: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package player
%{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-player*.jar.*
jorbis.spec:178: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package comment
%{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-comment*.jar.*
6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.
* OK
! needs attention
* rpmlint warnings are bogus - rpmlint does not understand the
conditional BuildArch.
* Package is named according to the guidelines
* The specfile is named after the package
* The package follows the guidelines for a native Java package
* Package license is Fedora approved (LGPLv2+)
* The README file says that the license is LGPL with no version, but
that is equivalent to LGPLv2+ according to the Fedora License list
* The license file (COPYING.LIB) in the sources is installed as %doc
* The specfile is written in legible English
* Sources matches upstream:
6141edfb16d34412a86c95a97fd4b10f jorbis-0.0.17.zip
6141edfb16d34412a86c95a97fd4b10f SRPM/jorbis-0.0.17.zip
* Package builds in mock (Fedora 10)
* BuildRequires are sane
* No shared libraries
* Package owns the directories it creates
! The jars in -comment and -player are also in main (duplicate files)
* Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr
* %clean clears buildroot
* Consistent use of macros
* Documentation in -javadoc package
* %doc is not runtime essential
* subpackages require main with fully versioned dependencies
* Package does not own other's directories
* %install clears buildroot
* Installed filenames are valid UTF-8
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498189] New: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Depends on: 498188 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: JavaScript::Minifier::XS is a JavaScript minifier; its designed to remove un-necessary whitespace and comments from JavaScript files, which also not breaking the JavaScript. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498191] New: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498191 Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR-0.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module installs PAR distributions (i.e. .par files) into any perl installation on the system. The PAR::Dist module can install into the currently running perl by default and provides the necessary parameters to override any installation directories. Figuring out how to use those overrides in order to install into an arbitrary perl installation on the system may be beyond most users, however. Hence this convenience wrapper using ExtUtils::InferConfig to automatically determine the typical site installation paths of any perl interpreter than can be executed by the current user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-29 08:08:06 EDT --- PyQwt-5.1.0-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PyQwt-5.1.0-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-29 08:12:12 EDT --- Whoops, I was too fast: SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-29 08:11:30
EDT ---
rpmlint output is clean.
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. OK
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #8 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-04-29 08:18:20 EDT --- I meant %prep, not %pre. :) Sorry! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498193] New: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498193 Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig-1.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Description:This module can determine the configuration and @INC of a perl interpreter given its path and that it is runnable by the current user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-29 08:02:26
EDT ---
- Require system-icon-theme instead of fedora-icon-theme, as one should be able
to remove Fedora brandings altogether.
- Is the obsoletesprovides really necessary since there AFAIK is not and
hasn't ever been a lxde-settings package in Fedora?
rpmlint output is clean.
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
- lxde-settings-daemon.c is under GPLv2+, other files are under MIT.
- I'm not sure, however, if the MIT license needs to be mentioned since it's
compatible with GPLv2+.
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. NEEDSFIX
- Package already Requires: lxde-common which provides /usr/share/lxde =
remove
%dir %{_datadir}/lxde/
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. OK
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498196] New: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498196 Summary: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module is an interface to the W3C CSS Validation online service http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/, based on its SOAP 1.2 support. It helps to find errors in Cascading Style Sheets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498197] New: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-mobile - Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phones
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-mobile - Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498197 Summary: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-mobile - Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phones Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, tcall...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, kana...@kanarip.com, fedora-jas...@newnewyork.nl Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: [Will come very soon] SRPM URL: [Will come very soon] Description: The Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phone users unable to use the Zarafa Webaccess based on Ajax and whose mobile phone is not supported via ActiveSync yet. View your e-mail, calendar and contacts via your mobile device. Zarafa Webaccess Mobile has a text interface only and allows users to create simple e-mails, appointments, contacts and tasks. I'll add the spec file, once I clarified some library dependency issues with Jeroen or so. SRPM shipping is for now a legal problem as I'm testing with an non-official release candidate, nevertheless, there are still some licensing issues with Zarafa, Tom is investigating into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498194] New: Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Summary: Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, tcall...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, kana...@kanarip.com, fedora-jas...@newnewyork.nl Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: [Will come very soon] SRPM URL: [Will come very soon] Description: Zarafa Outlook Sharing is a Microsoft Exchange replacement. The Open Source Collaboration provides an integration with your existing Linux mail server, native mobile phone support by ActiveSync compatiblity and a webaccess with 'Look Feel' similar to Outlook using Ajax. Including an IMAP4 and a POP3 gateway as well as an iCal/CalDAV gateway, Zarafa can combine the usability with the stability and flexibility of a Linux server. The proven Zarafa groupware solution is using MAPI objects, provides a MAPI client library as well as programming interfaces for C++, PHP and Perl. The other Zarafa related packages need to be installed to gain all the features and benefits of Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration. I'll add the spec file, once I clarified some library dependency issues with Jeroen or so. SRPM shipping is for now a legal problem as I'm testing with an non-official release candidate, nevertheless, there are still some licensing issues with Zarafa, Tom is investigating into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498195] New: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look Feel' similar to Outlook
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look Feel' similar to Outlook https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498195 Summary: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look Feel' similar to Outlook Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, tcall...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, kana...@kanarip.com, fedora-jas...@newnewyork.nl Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: [Will come very soon] SRPM URL: [Will come very soon] Description: Zarafa Webaccess features the familiar Outlook 'Look Feel' interface and you can keep using the features in Outlook that have always allowed you to work efficiently. View your e-mail, calendar and contacts via a web browser. And opening your colleagues calendar or sending a meeting request is only a piece of cake. The Zarafa Webaccess is using the ajax technology to give a more interactive feeling to the users. I'll add the spec file, once I clarified some library dependency issues with Jeroen or so. SRPM shipping is for now a legal problem as I'm testing with an non-official release candidate, nevertheless, there are still some licensing issues with Zarafa, Tom is investigating into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498198] New: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C - Access the W3Cs online HTML validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C - Access the W3Cs online HTML validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498198 Summary: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C - Access the W3Cs online HTML validator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C-0.24-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: WebService::Validator::HTML::W3C provides access to the W3C's online Markup validator. As well as reporting on whether a page is valid it also provides access to a detailed list of the errors and where in the validated document they occur. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498199] New: Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 Summary: Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: serein...@online.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tmp.sereinity.homelinux.org/rpm/dynamic-wallpaper.spec SRPM URL: http://tmp.sereinity.homelinux.org/rpm/dynamic-wallpaper-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Dynamic wallpaper is based on weather-wallpaper and generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season, time of day and others. It supports themes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com 2009-04-29 08:45:06 EDT --- Thanks! And sorry for the delay. I've been running 1.6.21 and most things work (apart from, strangely, the Log Out button). http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/netbook-launcher.spec http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/netbook-launcher-1.6.21-1.fc11.src.rpm Should we ask the legal team about the netbook trademark? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498200] Review Request: window-picker-applet - Window picker applet for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498200 Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||462851(FedoraMini) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||michel.syl...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|michel.syl...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498200] New: Review Request: window-picker-applet - Window picker applet for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: window-picker-applet - Window picker applet for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498200 Summary: Review Request: window-picker-applet - Window picker applet for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.syl...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/window-picker-applet.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/window-picker-applet-0.4.23-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A gnome-panel applet that displays open windows as icons on the panel, and has integrated window title-bar functionality. Optimised for use on netbook-size screens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||462851(FedoraMini) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||462851(FedoraMini) Depends on|462851(FedoraMini) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-04-29 08:58:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: lxinput Short Description: Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498203] New: Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498203 Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-YAML-LibYAML.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.32-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Kirill Siminov's libyaml is arguably the best YAML implementation. The C library is written precisely to the YAML 1.1 specification. It was originally bound to Python and was later bound to Ruby. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498204] New: Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker-0.02-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Wx::Perl::DataWalker implements a Wx::Frame subclass that shows a relatively simple Perl data structure browser. After opening such a frame and supplying it with a reference to an essentially arbitrary data structure, you can visually browse it by double-clicking references. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||498195, 498196 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498195] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look Feel' similar to Outlook
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498195 Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||498194 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498196] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498196 Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||498194 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|498196 |498197 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498196] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498196 Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|498194 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498197] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-mobile - Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phones
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498197 Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||498194 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #40 from Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com 2009-04-29 09:29:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) Definitely getting there :) Right now, all the descriptions are identical. Wouldn't it be better if the different packages explained what they contained, instead of just a common description of what Mumble is? Unless you already know, it's not very clear what mumble-overlay does. Changed for everything except for protocol. Dont now what to write. You're calling the package murmur, which provides mumble-murmur. If you make it provide mumble-server instead (or simply make it the server subpackage), you'll match the naming used in other distros, which means less confusion :) It's called mumble-server now. You're currently renaming the binary from murmurd to murmur. The 'd' is kind of standard for daemons, and I suggest leaving it. Changed. Read the comment about the input-policy file above :) Unless you know it to work in current revisions of Fedora, I recommend dropping it. To be honest with you I don't even now what it does. I'll put it as documentation so if somebody wants it, it can get it there. There needs to be a post-install for murmur/mumble-server that reloads the dbus service. dbus uses inotify to monitor conf files. They'll get updated automatically. You're installing a logrotate, and your murmur.ini contains logging information for /var/log/murmur, but this directory isn't created anywhere. Same goes for /var/run/murmur (where murmur will try to store it's pid file) Are you sure about this? I just untared mumble-1.1.8.tar.gz and opened scripts/murmur.ini.system and it says this: logfile=/var/log/mumble-server/mumble-server.log pidfile=/var/run/mumble-server/mumble-server.pid murmur.logrotate first line is: /var/log/mumble-server/mumble-server.log Files coming in about one hour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #4 from Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com 2009-04-29 09:37:30 EDT --- Ant, have you been sponsored yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441
--- Comment #41 from Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com 2009-04-29 09:36:44 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #40)
(In reply to comment #39)
Definitely getting there :)
You're installing a logrotate, and your murmur.ini contains logging
information
for /var/log/murmur, but this directory isn't created anywhere. Same goes
for
/var/run/murmur (where murmur will try to store it's pid file)
Are you sure about this? I just untared mumble-1.1.8.tar.gz and opened
scripts/murmur.ini.system and it says this:
logfile=/var/log/mumble-server/mumble-server.log
pidfile=/var/run/mumble-server/mumble-server.pid
murmur.logrotate first line is:
/var/log/mumble-server/mumble-server.log
that is correct but you need to mkdir -p
%{buildroot}%{_localstatedir}/log/mumble-server and mkdir -p
%{buildroot}%{_localstatedir}/run/mumble-server
and %dir them both in the files section:
%dir %{_localstatedir}/log/mumble-server
%dir %{_localstatedir}/run/mumble-server
Files coming in about one hour.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(o...@geek.co.il) --- Comment #20 from Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com 2009-04-29 09:39:55 EDT --- Ping again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125
--- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-04-29
09:41:28 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
- Require system-icon-theme instead of fedora-icon-theme, as one should be
able
to remove Fedora brandings altogether.
The reason for choosing fedora-icon-theme over system-icon-theme is that I
explicitly set Fedora in the patch. Changed.
- Is the obsoletesprovides really necessary since there AFAIK is not and
hasn't ever been a lxde-settings package in Fedora?
You are correct. I made one as a subpackage of the current lxde-common, but I
never built it. Removed.
- lxde-settings-daemon.c is under GPLv2+, other files are under MIT.
- I'm not sure, however, if the MIT license needs to be mentioned since it's
compatible with GPLv2+.
Agreed and removed. BTW: The included COPYING is GPLv3, not v2. Upstream
confirmed this was an error. You want me to replace the file in the package or
leave it as is for now.
- Package already Requires: lxde-common which provides /usr/share/lxde =
remove
%dir %{_datadir}/lxde/
That was intentional. I omitted the dir from lxde-common-0.4 and made it
require lxde-settings-daemon instead.
Updated package:
SPEC: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-settings-daemon.spec
SRPM:
http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-2.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498214] New: Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 Summary: Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gausssum.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gausssum-2.1.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: GaussSum is a GUI application that can analyse the output of ADF, GAMESS (US), GAMESS-UK, Gaussian, Jaguar and PC GAMESS to extract and calculate useful information. This includes the progress of the SCF cycles, geometry optimisation, UV-Vis/IR/Raman spectra, MO levels, MO contributions and more. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498216] New: Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode Alias: perl-Perl-Tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl-Tags/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Perl-Tags.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Perl-Tags-0.26-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Generate (possibly exuberant) Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode. Recursively follows use and require statements, up to a maximum of max_level. The implemented tagger, Perl::Tags::Naive is a more-or-less straight ripoff, slightly updated, of the original pltags code, and is rather naive. It should be possible to subclass using something like PPI or Text::Balanced, though be aware that this is alpha software and the internals are subject to change. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328528 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
