[Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis|| Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| |, fedora-review?| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-28 01:00 EST --- This has been in needinfo state since March. Any chance of anything happening here? I'm sure someone on fedora-devel would be willing to provide a place to put these files if that's all that's holding up this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |m) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-08 18:02 EST --- Are you still around? The urls above no longer work. Also looks like pybaz has moved to http://code.aaronbentley.com/pybaz/ and 1.5.2 has been released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-08 18:54 EST --- Somewhat. Since posting those files I've changed jobs once and cities twice; I'm currently in the process of getting Internet access again, which should happen next Thursday if all goes to plan. As the files were hosted on my workstation at my previous employer and my current employer probably wouldn't be terribly happy about hosting them, I'll have to wait before I can put them up at a new URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-14 11:28 EST --- Heh, my previous comment must have been lost. Oh well. Thanks for you patience in reviewing this package, life has been pretty busy and shepharding troublesome packges through review has had to take a lower priority than usual. I've added make check to the %check section and fixed the earlier epydoc by patching the script that gets run with make doc to skip documenting the 'logging.Logger' instance that caused error. This causes an epydoc warning at the end of make doc, but as logging is a standard library anyway, this isn't much of a problem. New files are at: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/pybaz.spec http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/pybaz-1.4-0.2.20060602arch.patch1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-09 11:19 EST --- Thanks for your patience in reviewing this package, I've been swamped with work, school and other miscellany so that fixing troublesome packages has been relatively low on the TODO list. I have new packages files up that you can look at, they add 'make check' and change the pseudo-fix before to work around the problem at the epydoc level. 'make doc' give a warning at the end as a result about not building the documentation for 'logging.Logger', but as it's a standard module I don't think it should have been trying to build that documenation anyway... http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/pybaz.spec http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/pybaz-1.4-0.2.20060602arch.patch1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-05 13:14 EST --- Created an attachment (id=130522) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130522action=view) rpmbuild log I'm still seeing lots of errors from make check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-16 13:00 EST --- Updated files are at: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/pybaz.spec http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/pybaz-1.1-2.src.rpm Yeah, I was having similar repo issues until I manually specified the .noarch package. I'm not exactly sure where the problem is, but I think yum always prefers architecture-specific packages even over newer noarch ones. I've attempted to work around the problem by specifying a BuildRequires on epydoc 2.1-2. The warnings from make doc can be ignored. The error that mentions twisted.internet is because the twisted module isn't installed when it's making the documentation. I wasn't sure how to handle that as it isn't a hard requires, but rpm has no mechanism for suggests. In the updated files I have added python-twisted as a BuildRequires, but not a Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-16 13:34 EST --- I have updated files that add a horrible kludge to cope with the bad repo package until this gets fixed. http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/pybaz.spec http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/pybaz-1.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU
Arch/Bazaar RCS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-15 13:15 EST ---
Good -
- package name matches guidelines
- spec is clean/legible
- License is good, matches source.
- owns dirs.
- builds in mock on devel.
Must fix:
- Add COPYING to %doc
- Drop unneeded python-devel BR.
Trouble:
- My mock for FC5 is pulling in epydoc-2.1-2.i386 rather than
epydoc-2.1-4.noarch, and make doc fails with the former but works with the
latter. I think we'll need to get the repo fixed before a fc5 build works.
I'll post a message to the FE list about it.
Question:
- Get the following output during make doc devel. Not sure if it causes any
problems though:
make doc
rm -rf html
mkdir ,,make-doc || exit 1
cp -al pybaz ,,make-doc
rm -rf ,,make-doc/pybaz/tests
cd ,,make-doc ; ../mypydoc --docformat restructuredtext en --no-private pybaz
Importing 15 modules.
[.
Error importing 'pybaz.backends.knotted': No module named twisted.internet
..]
Building API documentation for 14 modules.
[./usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/epydoc/markup/restructuredtext.py:174:
DeprecationWarning: docutils.utils.Reporter.set_conditions deprecated; set
attributes via configuration settings or directly
document.reporter.set_conditions('', 1, 1, None)
===
In pybaz.ArchSourceTree.iter_inventory docstring:
---
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter source
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter precious
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter backups
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter junk
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter unrecognized
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter trees
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter directories
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter files
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter both
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter limit
===
In pybaz.WorkingTree.commit docstring:
---
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter version
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter log
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter strict
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter seal
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter fix
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter out_of_date_ok
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter file_list
===
In pybaz.WorkingTree.iter_commit docstring:
---
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter version
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter log
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter strict
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter seal
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter fix
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter out_of_date_ok
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter file_list
===
In pybaz.WorkingTree.undo docstring:
---
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter revision
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter output
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter quiet
- Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter throw_away
.]
Writing HTML docs (100 files) to 'html'.
[ 1%]
[ 61%]
Warning: Failed identifier crossreference targets:
- file.next (from pybaz.backends.forkexec.exec_safe_iter_stdout.next)
- file.readline (from pybaz.backends.forkexec.exec_safe_iter_stdout.next)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are
