[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 04:53 EST --- The bug is down to something missing in the PPC version of glibc (it's not been ported across if memory serves me right). I did file a BZ report on it but was told that the missing bit wasn't going to be implemented. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 05:23 EST --- What bugzilla number? If the something missing is something that mono-debugger can't do without, then it would be strange for the glibc bug to be closed 'wontfix'. If it's something that mono-debugger _can_ do without, then mono-debugger should be fixed. Either way, there should be a bug filed against mono-debugger which a) Clearly explains the problem b) depends on the glibc bug you mention c) blocks FE-ExcludeArch-ppc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 05:48 EST --- Aha, it seems to be bug 205017. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-06 21:48 EST --- Is this package still excluded on PPC? If so, the bug on the FE-ExcludeArch-ppc tracker shouldn't be closed. Please could you open a new bug if the package still isn't working -- and then fix the bug too :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-31 06:25 EST --- Please do not remove the FE-ACCEPT blocker. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |
nThis||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-02 10:23 EST ---
I've had to add excludearch-ppc to get it to build on the buildsys due to
missing definitions in the ppc %{_includedir}/sys/user.h file
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||179260 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-30 10:53 EST --- Doesn't build, needs a BuildRequires: libtool to get past autoreconf. When it does build, I get: E: mono-debugger shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib64/libmonodebuggerreadline.so.0.0.0 Not sure why, the build log indicates compiling with -fPIC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #135088|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-30 20:17 EST --- Created an attachment (id=135251) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135251action=view) Fixed spec file Fixes the libtool problem. I can't reproduce the fPIC problem (though I thought that problem was no longer a blocker or something like that) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-28 14:21 EST --- Better with the libdir fix, but still needs some work: - Missing a %defattr entry for devel package - Source0 is 404, looks like you want http://go-mono.com/sources/mono-debugger/mono-debugger-0.30.tar.gz - don't disable debug, there is debugging symbols. - license is not LGPL, looks like MIT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-28 15:08 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger.spec Fixes all from #15 - tar ball is the same -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-28 17:30 EST --- Created an attachment (id=135088) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135088action=view) New spec file Sorry had to put the new spec file here, but I can't seem to upload at the moment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-28 17:41 EST --- Created an attachment (id=135090) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135090action=view) monodebug-configure patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-27 06:06 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger-0.30-3.src.rpm Fixes correctly for 64 bit Additional BRs (autoconf and automake) Moved README.build to the -devel package Fixed ownership problem on a directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 07:03 EST --- Ping! It looks like mono-debugger is going to be required for the next release of MonoDevelop (due shortly) so this package could probably do with being looked at -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 08:01 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger-0.30-2.src.rpm Removes the old mono hack Rebuilt for new mono packages Added BR mono-nunit Added R pkgconfig for -devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-16 17:04 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger-0.30-1.src.rpm Bump to new version Fixes the problems listed above. The mono hack is currently okay (grudgingly) I have a feeling that when this is approved, that monodevelop will be able to use it as well :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-16 17:12 EST --- mono-devel does provide /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/mono.pc on x86_64. No. mono-libs-devel provides the mono.pc file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-10 07:17 EST --- Sorry. Should be up in the next couple of mins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-08 01:02 EST --- SRPM is 404 not found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 09:34 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger-0.12-3.src.rpm Change of URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 15:13 EST ---
Those globs in %files are playing evil with directories ownership.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/mono/1.0
mono-core-1.1.13.7-1.fc5.1
mono-debugger-0.12-3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/mono/gac
gtk-sharp2-2.8.2-1
gtk-sharp-1.0.10-5
mono-core-1.1.13.7-1.fc5.1
gtksourceview-sharp-2.0-7
monodoc-1.1.13-6
mono-debugger-0.12-3
Both /usr/lib/mono/1.0 and /usr/lib/mono/gac should be owned by mono-core.
A quick fix up for mono-debugger.spec:
%files
%defattr(-, root, root)
%doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog README README.FreeBSD README.build TODO NEWS
RELEASE-NOTES*
%{_bindir}/mdb
%{_libdir}/*.so*
%{_libdir}/mono/1.0/*.exe
%{_libdir}/mono/1.0/gac/Mono.Debugger/*
%{_libdir}/mono/1.0/gac/Mono.Debugger.Cecil/*
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/mono-debugger.pc
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 17:16 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger-0.12-4.src.rpm Addresses problems seen in #5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|178904 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-02 11:09 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/mono-debugger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/mono-debugger-0.12-3.src.rpm Change log Fix for glib2-devel (#2) Added devel package 64 bit architecture fix Spec file tweaks Added --disable-static to the configure line and removed the find line in the installer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
