[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO||201449 nThis|| Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |m) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-13 15:05 EST --- It's been a week; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review? | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-06 12:41 EST --- I'm removing myself from this review. No activity and it's cluttering up my bug views. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis|| Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||m) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-06 13:02 EST --- Cleaning up blockers. At this point it seems that we've been waiting on a response from the reporter for over a month now. Setting NEEDINFO; I'll close this in a week if there's no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-08 00:13 EST --- Hey Jim: Any thoughts on which way you would like to go? See comment #15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-01 12:55 EST --- I was hoping that zope would make it an a future update to this release - there has been talk on the zope lists about it. If, in fact, you will NEVER, EVER let zope that works with python 2.5 in fedora 7, then this ticket is definetely a moot one. Can this ticket be cloned for Fedora 8, then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-01 15:54 EST --- Well, the problem is that Zope won't work at all with python 2.5 right now. So, it can't be in devel and F-7. I'm sure we will re-add it in a flash once it does, but it sounds like there is a LOT of work needed to get it there currently. I suppose we could just leave this ticket open for that day, or we could perhaps close it for now, and resubmit/reopen it once Zope is back? Alternately, I suppose you could continue now and only build for fc5/fc6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-01 01:53 EST --- Note that Zope/Plone are not in F-7 due to Zope not running on python-2.5, which ships in that release. :( So, does it make sense to continue this submission? Jesse: Are you reviewing this package? You should set fedora-review to ? if so. Jim: Do you still want to continue this submission? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-21 16:49 EST ---
Jim, this package pulls in and packages local copies of zope and plone. Is there
any way it could instead use the Fedora zope/plone packages?
Note that I'm not asking for %{include_zope_and_plone} to be set to no, but
rather that you use the zope and plone packages that are already in Fedora
Extras.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |m) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-20 15:10 EST --- http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/fc/conga.spec http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/fc/conga-0.9.3-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 08:30 EST --- Is there an updated srpm? Last time I tried this didn't build before, and there seems to just be a comment from Stanko about how to fix it, but no updates source package to try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 11:27 EST --- 'dbus_connection_disconnect' has been renamed to 'dbus_connection_close' in the latest update of dbus packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-10 11:00 EST --- New version with fixes for list above: http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/extras/conga.spec http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/extras/conga-0.8-7.FC6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-10 11:55 EST --- Sorry - link for new src rpm is actually: http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/extras/conga-0.8-7.fc6.src.rpm spec file link is OK: http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/extras/conga.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-06 17:47 EST ---
Please check out version 0.8-7 (will publish on Friday, July, 7th 2006):
Spec URL: http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/extras/conga.spec
SRPM URL: http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/extras/conga-0.8-7.fc6.src.rpm
* It would be better to split the package into several source packages (e.g.,
conga, luci, ricci, and cluster-*). That would probably also help expediting the
review; when you do that, file separate review requests for each package
- ricci, ricci-modcluster, cluster-cim and cluster-snmp build from the same
source code, and has been split into several packages so that users can pick and
choose what they need
* Please run rpmlint on the generated packages and either fix the
errors/warnings it generates, or explain here why you think they are ok to
ignore
- rpmlint output at the end
* You shouldn't require /bin/bash, it's in the list of requirement exceptions
(see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-4cadce5e79d38a63cad3941de1dadc9d25d67d30)
- removed
* The summary of the packages should be a short one-sentence description of each
package.
- added
* There is no need to have a 'Provides: %name' for each package
- removed
* You shouldn't hardcode the distribution in the release tag; instead use
'6{%?dist}' as the release - the build system will fill in the appropriate value
(.fc5, .fc6 etc.)
- fixed
* Do not manually set _libdir on x86_64; it's automatically set to the right
thing by rpm
- rpmbuild used not to do that, not setting manually any more
* Why does ricci have a number of 'Requires: ricci-xyz = version' and 'Provides:
ricci-xyz' ? Shouldn't the provides be versioned, too ? There's no need for
those requires
- fixed
rpmlint *rpm | grep -v non-standard-uid (both ricci and luci run under their own
respective users):
E: luci non-readable /var/lib/luci/var/Data.fs 0600
- Data.fs contains data that should be viewed by luci only
E: luci non-executable-script /var/lib/luci/Extensions/ModelBuilder.py 0644
- python file with self-test function
E: luci executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/luci
- init script
W: luci dangerous-command-in-%post chmod
- rpm generates private ssl key, has to be readable by luci only
E: ricci executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ricci
- init script
E: ricci setuid-binary /usr/sbin/ricci-auth root 04755
E: ricci non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/ricci-auth 04755
- authentication helper; verifies root password against pam libraries, while
ricci runs as non-root - should be set-uid
W: ricci dangerous-command-in-%post chown
- rpm generates private ssl key, has to be readable by ricci only
W: ricci service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ricci
- idea behind ricci is that after installation, luci connects to it, without
any user interaction
W: ricci-modcluster service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ricci-modclusterd
- same goes for cluster module
E: ricci-modcluster executable-marked-as-config-file
/etc/rc.d/init.d/ricci-modclusterd
- init script
W: ricci-modcluster incoherent-init-script-name ricci-modclusterd
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-30 11:23 EST --- This submission is for Extras -- Conga has deps on Zope and Plone which are already in Extras. As far as check boxes go - I didn't have any idea what to select...I thought that because my pkg was under review, that I should check that box.But I will gladly check/uncheck any boxes that you tell me to! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Group|devel,fedora_contrib| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-30 15:23 EST ---
Not a full review, just a few comments from looking at and building the package:
* It would be better to split the package into several source packages (e.g.,
conga, luci, ricci, and cluster-*). That would probably also help expediting the
review; when you do that, file separate review requests for each package
* Please run rpmlint on the generated packages and either fix the
errors/warnings it generates, or explain here why you think they are ok to
ignore
* You shouldn't require /bin/bash, it's in the list of requirement exceptions
(see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-4cadce5e79d38a63cad3941de1dadc9d25d67d30)
* The summary of the packages should be a short one-sentence description of each
package.
* There is no need to have a 'Provides: %name' for each package
* You shouldn't hardcode the distribution in the release tag; instead use
'6{%?dist}' as the release - the build system will fill in the appropriate value
(.fc5, .fc6 etc.)
* Do not manually set _libdir on x86_64; it's automatically set to the right
thing by rpm
* Why does ricci have a number of 'Requires: ricci-xyz = version' and 'Provides:
ricci-xyz' ? Shouldn't the provides be versioned, too ? There's no need for
those requires
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-29 22:02 EST --- Is this submission for extras or should it be for core? Also, why is this bug marked Fedora Project Contributors only? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
