[Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-05-20 01:32:27 EDT --- ok. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ra...@bludgeon.org Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org 2009-05-18 16:10:51 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: weechat New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: rayvd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-05-18 19:40:06 EDT --- Ray: Have you asked Paul if he wants to maintain this in epel and/or has no interest in doing so? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 --- Comment #8 from Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org 2009-05-18 20:25:22 EDT --- Yes. Via email. And he should be CC'd on this in case he wants to pipe up. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-25 06:50 EST --- *** Bug 238518 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC
client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-25 08:38 EST ---
Hello, I know it's late, but for next time:
In spec file:
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-buildroot
Should be:
BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
It's recommended, see also: Build root tag in Fedora wiki
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-25 09:52 EST --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC
client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-24 15:39 EST ---
* MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the
review.
OK, clear
* MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
OK
* MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines.
OK
* MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
OK
* MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and
meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
OK; GPL
* MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
OK; GPL 2, June 1991
* MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
OK; COPYING
* MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK
* MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK
* MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
OK; md5 - c7c7f89d6dac502ad31d12198a8836c1
* MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one supported architecture.
OK; i386
* MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
OK; no ExcluseArch meanwhile; no notice from upstream.
* MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
OK
* MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
OK
* MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just
symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in
%post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each
subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig.
OK
* MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
OK
* MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
OK
* MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
OK
* MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
OK
* MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
OK
* MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
OK
* MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described
in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
OK
* MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage.
OK
* MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application.
OK
* MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
OK; There is no header files in telepathy-idle package.
* MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
Ok
* MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
OK
* MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package.
OK, *.so here are symlinks
* MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
OK; Not devel
* MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
removed in the spec.
OK
* MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
OK; No GUI.
* MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
OK
* MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
OK
* MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-25 01:24 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: weechat Short Description: Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
