[Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800
--- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-15 02:07:26 EDT
---
unable to build the package due to FAILED: BuildError: package ebnetd not in
list for tag dist-{f10,{f9,f8}-updates-candidate}.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-15 03:34:22 EDT --- there seems to be a delay. it's ok now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-14 09:22:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ebnetd Short Description: EBNET protocol server Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-9 F-8 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 --- Comment #10 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-15 01:25:46 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-13 09:03:19 EDT --- Perfect. Thanks! APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-12 03:49:13 EDT --- Thanks. updated. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ebnetd/ebnetd.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ebnetd/ebnetd-1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-11 08:12:42 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I'd prefer adding a document how to change the port too. updated srpm and spec file is: Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ebnetd/ebnetd.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ebnetd/ebnetd-1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #6 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-11 10:47:45 EDT --- Please avoid using fedora in the file name: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Avoiding_using_fedora_or_redhat -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-10 10:41:06 EDT --- What's comment #3 about? Anyway. . . rpmlint on SRPM is clean. rpmlint on RPMS: ebhttpd.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ebnetd.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ebnetd-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/ebnetd ebnetd A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. ebnetd-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/ebnetd ebnetd A file in this package is owned by a non standard group. Standard groups are: root, bin, daemon, sys, adm, tty, disk, lp, mem, kmem, wheel, mail, news, uucp, man, games, gopher, dip, ftp, lock, nobody, users. ebnetd-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/ebnetd ebnetd A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. ebnetd-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/ebnetd ebnetd A file in this package is owned by a non standard group. Standard groups are: root, bin, daemon, sys, adm, tty, disk, lp, mem, kmem, wheel, mail, news, uucp, man, games, gopher, dip, ftp, lock, nobody, users. ndtpd.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. These are all fine, see above. Otherwise, everything looks great, my only other concern after a full review is the Conflicts: for ebhttpd. Will users expect this to be on port 80 by default, period, full stop, or would it be feasible to set it to use something else by default, or recommend that to users? It'd be as simple as modifying the xinetd file. My preference would be to leave it as is, drop the Conflicts:, but add a ebnetd-README.fedora indicating the port 80 issues and resolutions, so that if someone wants to use this on a machine with an existing httpd/tux/whatever, then they have that option and won't be stopped by the RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Tony Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-09 23:07:22 EDT --- requested by Jens Petersen (#27995) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 05:32 EST --- Thanks, updated. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ebnetd/ebnetd.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ebnetd/ebnetd-1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 17:17 EST --- You'll need to remove the errant info dir in order for this to build. You shouldn't include the same six documentation files in every subpackage. That's all I see at a quick glance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
