[Bug 455541] Review Request: dojo - javascript library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455541 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cw...@alumni.drew.edu Alias||dojo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455541] Review Request: dojo - javascript library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455541 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-03-07 10:57:11 EDT --- Ok, I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455541] Review Request: dojo - javascript library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455541 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-03-07 12:24:59 EDT --- Originally we were holding off on some of these javascript packages until we figured out some guidelines for packaging them, but that effort doesn't seem to be going anywhere at all. It's a rather difficult issue, honestly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455541] Review Request: dojo - javascript library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455541 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-02-16 13:33:30 EDT --- Ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455541] Review Request: dojo - javascript library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455541 --- Comment #5 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2009-02-16 19:21:30 EDT --- Oops, sorry, I tried to fix things, then dropped this on the floor. Updated version uploaded: Specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/dojo.spec SRPMS: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/dojo-1.1.1-2.src.rpm This versions appears to have successfully removed the wav files from the built rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455541] Review Request: dojo - javascript library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455541 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 02:02:45 EDT --- +1 month now, Any updates here? needinfo ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455541] Review Request: dojo - javascript library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dojo - javascript library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455541 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-20 22:52 EST --- rpmlint is not clean: dojo.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 42) dojo.src: W: invalid-license AFL2.1 --- dojo.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/dojo/dojo/cldr/LICENSE dojo.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/dojo/dojox/storage/buildFlashStorage.sh 0644 dojo.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/dojo/dojox/encoding/LICENSE dojo.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/dojo/dojox/rpc/test.txt dojo.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/dojo/dojox/flash/tests/buildFlashTest.sh 0644 dojo.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/dojo/dojo/tests/io/upload.cgi 0644 dojo.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/dojo/util/doh/runner.sh 0644 dojo.noarch: W: invalid-license AFL2.1 --- You are listing these files for both macros, doc and datadir. The text files should all go under /usr/share/doc aka %doc. warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dojo/dijit/LICENSE warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dojo/dojo/LICENSE warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dojo/dojo/_firebug/LICENSE warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dojo/dojo/cldr/LICENSE warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dojo/dojo/cldr/README warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dojo/dojo/resources/LICENSE warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dojo/dojox/LICENSE warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dojo/dojox/_sql/LICENSE warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dojo/dojox/encoding/LICENSE warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dojo/dojox/encoding/README warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dojo/dojox/lang/LICENSE warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dojo/dojox/lang/README warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dojo/util/doh/LICENSE warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dojo/util/doh/README -- Your spec claims you are deleting the sounds. Yet on my installation of the package, I see /usr/share/dojo/util/doh/_sounds/LICENSE /usr/share/dojo/util/doh/_sounds/doh.wav /usr/share/dojo/util/doh/_sounds/dohaaa.wav /usr/share/dojo/util/doh/_sounds/woohoo.wav You should contact upstream and clarify licensing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455541] Review Request: dojo - javascript library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dojo - javascript library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455541 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-20 22:59 EST --- Nothing under util directory seems to have clear licensing at all including the couple of js files. There is a no license text within that directory either. Shouldn't all the files independently carry a copyright notice and licensing information in the header? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review