[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-03-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405


Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||491317(mingw32-gstreamer)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405





--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-01-29 18:01:58 EDT ---
mingw32-libxml2-2.7.2-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-01-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405





--- Comment #20 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com  2009-01-28 
07:11:31 EDT ---
Built in Rawhide, F-10 and EL-5.
In response to comment 16 - Levente this built fine in EL-5.

I'll wait for the F-10 update before closing this bug.

Thanks to Tim and Kevin for working on this bug.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-01-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405


Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@googlemail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tim.laurid...@googlemail.co
   ||m
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tim.laurid...@googlemail.co
   ||m
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Comment #13 from Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@googlemail.com  2009-01-26 
06:06:04 EDT ---
* Sources matches upstream
 dc43ff7ae6aded45f578c87b7b0c8766 libxml2-2.7.2.tar.gz (upstream)
 dc43ff7ae6aded45f578c87b7b0c8766 libxml2-2.7.2.tar.gz (SRPM)

$ rpmlint mingw32-libxml2-2.7.2-5.fc11.src.rpm (SRPM)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.


$ rpmlint mingw32-libxml2-2.7.2-5.fc10.noarch.rpm (RPMS)
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/tutorial/includeaddkeyword.c
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/tree1.c
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/tutorial/includexpath.c
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlIO.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/relaxng.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/io1.c
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlstring.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/examples/testXPath.c
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/entities.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/examples/testSAX.c
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/chvalid.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/valid.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/reader2.c
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlautomata.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/reader4.c
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xinclude.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/HTMLparser.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xpathInternals.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xpath.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/parserInternals.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/nanoftp.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/c14n.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libxml2-2.7.2/html/parse4.c
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/list.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlreader.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlmemory.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libxml2/libxml/pattern.h
mingw32-libxml2.noarch: E: 

[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-01-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405





--- Comment #14 from Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@googlemail.com  2009-01-26 
06:09:27 EDT ---
The rpmlint noise should be ok for a mingw32 package
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Rpmlint

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-01-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405


Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@googlemail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-01-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405


Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@googlemail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #15 from Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@googlemail.com  2009-01-26 
06:18:47 EDT ---
MUST:
* package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
mingw32-*
* spec file name match base package
* package meet Packaging Guidelines .
* package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing
Guidelines
* License field match the actual license.
* available license(s) file(s) is included in %doc.
* spec file is written in American English. 
* spec file is legible. 
* package compile on x86
* build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires
* no locales
* no shared libs
* package not relocatable
* package own all directories that it creates.
* no duplicate files in the %files listing. 
* Permissions on files must be set properly. (%defattr(...) line)
* %clean section present and contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
* package is consistently using macros
* package contain code, or permissable content
* no large doc
* %doc does not affect runtime
* no headers
* no static libs
* available pkgconfig(.pc) files 'Requires: pkgconfig' 
* no *.so.* libs
* no -devel packages
* not a GUI app.
* no files or directories already owned by other packages.
* %install begins with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
* filenames is valid UTF-8

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-01-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405





--- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com  2009-01-26 
07:22:12 EDT ---
Thanks for looking at this package Tim.

(In reply to comment #16)
 this still not compile on epel as i wrote in #6, would you add aclocal before
 autoreconf:

Don't worry Levente, I'll sort this out when I check in/build
for EL-5.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-01-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405


Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #18 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com  2009-01-26 
07:23:51 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: mingw32-libxml2
Short Description: MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library
Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas
Branches: F-10 EL-5
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-01-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405





--- Comment #16 from Levente Farkas lfar...@lfarkas.org  2009-01-26 07:12:08 
EDT ---
this still not compile on epel as i wrote in #6, would you add aclocal before
autoreconf:
--
cd .  /bin/sh /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing --run
aclocal-1.10 
/home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing: line 46: aclocal-1.10: command
not found
WARNING: `aclocal-1.10' is missing on your system.  You should only need it if
 you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'.  You might want
 to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages.  Grab them from
 any GNU archive site.
cd .  /bin/sh /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing --run autoconf
 cd .  /bin/sh /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing --run
automake-1.10 --gnu 
/home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing: line 46: automake-1.10: command
not found
WARNING: `automake-1.10' is missing on your system.  You should only need it if
 you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'.
 You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages.
 Grab them from any GNU archive site.
aclocal.m4:20: warning: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61.
You have another version of autoconf.  It may work, but is not guaranteed to.
If you have problems, you may need to regenerate the build system entirely.
To do so, use the procedure documented by the package, typically `autoreconf'.
configure.in:41: error: Autoconf version 2.60 or higher is required
aclocal.m4:7055: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE is expanded from...
configure.in:41: the top level
autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63
make: *** [configure] Error 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1386 (%build)
--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-01-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405


Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com  2009-01-26 17:45:20 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-01-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405





--- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com  2009-01-25 
08:22:22 EDT ---
Spec URL:
http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/libxml2/mingw32-libxml2.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libxml2-2.7.2-5.fc11.src.rpm

* Fri Jan 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 2.7.2-5
- Use _smp_mflags.
- Disable static libraries.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-01-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405





--- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com  2009-01-25 
08:26:23 EDT ---
The package in comment 11 now builds for me in Rawhide
without needing autoreconf/libtoolize, so ...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-01-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405


Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl

Bug 467405 depends on bug 467398, which changed state.

Bug 467398 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and 
utilities for producing multi-lingual messages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED



--- Comment #9 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl  
2009-01-23 13:04:24 EDT ---
This package doesn't compile anymore on Rawhide (due to the new libtool):

Making all in .
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2'
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC   --mode=compile i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I. -I./include -I./include  -DHAVE_WIN32_THREADS -D_REENTRANT-DWIN32  -O2
-g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
-mms-bitfields -pedantic -W -Wformat -Wunused -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wswitch
-Wcomment -Wtrigraphs -Wformat -Wchar-subscripts -Wuninitialized -Wparentheses
-Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Waggregate-return
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Winline
-Wredundant-decls -MT SAX.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/SAX.Tpo -c -o SAX.lo SAX.c
./libtool: line 840: X--tag=CC: command not found
./libtool: line 873: libtool: ignoring unknown tag : command not found
./libtool: line 840: X--mode=compile: command not found
./libtool: line 1007: *** Warning: inferring the mode of operation is
deprecated.: command not found
./libtool: line 1008: *** Future versions of Libtool will require --mode=MODE
be specified.: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: Xi686-pc-mingw32-gcc: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-DHAVE_CONFIG_H: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-I.: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-I./include: No such file or directory
./libtool: line 1151: X-I./include: No such file or directory
./libtool: line 1151: X-DHAVE_WIN32_THREADS: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-D_REENTRANT: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-DWIN32: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-O2: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-g: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-pipe: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wall: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-fexceptions: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X--param=ssp-buffer-size=4: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-mms-bitfields: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-pedantic: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-W: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wformat: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wunused: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wimplicit: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wreturn-type: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wswitch: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wcomment: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wtrigraphs: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wformat: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wchar-subscripts: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wuninitialized: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wparentheses: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wshadow: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wpointer-arith: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wcast-align: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wwrite-strings: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Waggregate-return: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wstrict-prototypes: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wmissing-prototypes: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wnested-externs: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Winline: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-Wredundant-decls: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-MT: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: XSAX.lo: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-MD: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-MP: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X-MF: command not found
./libtool: line 1151: X.deps/SAX.Tpo: No such file or directory
./libtool: line 1151: X-c: command not found
./libtool: line 1203: XSAX.lo: command not found
./libtool: line 1208: libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library object
from `': command not found
make[2]: *** [SAX.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2'

[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2009-01-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405





--- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com  2009-01-23 
14:21:48 EDT ---
Thanks for looking at this Erik.  I'm just now rebuilding the
entire package set against Rawhide and will fix the bugs along
the way.  I'll post here when I have new packages which work.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2008-12-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405


Bug 467405 depends on bug 454416, which changed state.

Bug 454416 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib 
compression library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2008-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405





--- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-12-10 11:36:26 
EDT ---
Spec URL:
http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/libxml2/mingw32-libxml2.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libxml2-2.7.2-3.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2008-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405


Bug 467405 depends on bug 454410, which changed state.

Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler 
(GCC) for C and C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2008-11-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405





--- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-11 05:31:24 
EDT ---
I have seen this sort of error before, but I'm not sure why it happens.

I've just checked the libxml2-2.7.2.tar.gz tarball that we are using and
the timestamps are correct - ie. aclocal.m4 is present with timestamp
later than configure.in, so I see no reason why the build process should
be trying to remake it.

The timestamps on other files look fine too.

Anyway, I still think we should leave this until we come to packaging
for EPEL (as I said in comment 4 above).  This is irrelevant to the Fedora
review request.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2008-11-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405


Levente Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Comment #1 from Levente Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-10 12:14:24 EDT 
---
please apply this patch to be able to build on epel too:

--- mingw32-libxml2.spec.lfarkas 2008-11-10 18:03:16.0 +0100
+++ mingw32-libxml2.spec 2008-11-10 18:06:52.0 +0100
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@


 %build
+%if 0%{?fedora}  9
+autoreconf
+%endif
 LDFLAGS=-no-undefined %{_mingw32_configure} --without-python --with-modules
 make

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2008-11-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405





--- Comment #2 from Levente Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-10 12:24:01 EDT 
---
at the same time in the files section this two lines:
---
%{_mingw32_libdir}/pkgconfig
%{_mingw32_libdir}/pkgconfig/libxml-2.0.pc
---
should have to change to
---
%{_mingw32_libdir}/pkgconfig/
%{_mingw32_libdir}/pkgconfig/libxml-2.0.pc
---
or imho better to delete the second line:
---
%{_mingw32_libdir}/pkgconfig
---

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2008-11-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405





--- Comment #3 from Levente Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-10 12:38:33 EDT 
---
and may be add an aclocal before the autoreconf would be useful to so the
correct patch see bellow

and the reason for rerun autoconf is that rhel/centos has older autoconf and
automake and the auto generated file was generated by newer tools, but with
this patch it can be compiled on rhel/centos without need for newer auto*
packages.

--- mingw32-libxml2.spec.lfarkas 2008-11-10 18:03:16.0 +0100
+++ mingw32-libxml2.spec 2008-11-10 18:35:10.0 +0100
@@ -40,6 +40,10 @@


 %build
+%if 0%{?fedora}  9
+aclocal
+autoreconf
+%endif
 LDFLAGS=-no-undefined %{_mingw32_configure} --without-python --with-modules
 make

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2008-11-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405





--- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-10 12:44:19 
EDT ---
Levente, I'll bear these changes in mind when we actually
add this package.  It doesn't affect the Fedora review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2008-11-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405





--- Comment #5 from Daniel Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-10 14:42:46 
EDT ---
The comments from #2/#3 don't make any sense. The RPM specfile for libxml isn't
making any changes to any Makefile.am or configure.in files, so running
autoreconf serves no purpose. It does not matter whether the version of
autotools the configure script was generated with is newer than that on the
host OS, because when compiling a package the generated 'configure' and
Makefile scripts are purposely self-contained at runtime.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2008-11-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405





--- Comment #6 from Levente Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-10 16:41:57 EDT 
---
for #2 the reason is this error message during rpmbuild:
---
RPM build errors:
File listed twice:
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/libxml-2.0.pc
---
i hope this makes cleaner.

for #3 without the autoreconf rpmbuild gives the error bellow. while with the
above patch don't (anyway i'm not a gnu build system so if you know a better
solution i welcome):
---
Done configuring
+ make
cd .  /bin/sh /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing --run
aclocal-1.10 
/home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing: line 46: aclocal-1.10: command
not found
WARNING: `aclocal-1.10' is missing on your system.  You should only need it if
 you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'.  You might want
 to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages.  Grab them from
 any GNU archive site.
 cd .  /bin/sh /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing --run
automake-1.10 --gnu 
/home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing: line 46: automake-1.10: command
not found
WARNING: `automake-1.10' is missing on your system.  You should only need it if
 you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'.
 You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages.
 Grab them from any GNU archive site.
cd .  /bin/sh /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing --run autoconf
aclocal.m4:20: warning: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61.
You have another version of autoconf.  It may work, but is not guaranteed to.
If you have problems, you may need to regenerate the build system entirely.
To do so, use the procedure documented by the package, typically `autoreconf'.
configure.in:41: error: Autoconf version 2.60 or higher is required
aclocal.m4:7055: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE is expanded from...
configure.in:41: the top level
autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63
make: *** [configure] Error 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.47244 (%build)
---

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2008-10-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405


Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED],
   ||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Depends on||454410, 467398, 454416
  Alias||mingw32-libxml2




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2008-10-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405


Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||467413




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2008-10-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405


Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||467416




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library

2008-10-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405


Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||467418




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review