[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2009-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2009-03-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2009-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2009-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2009-03-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 --- Comment #12 from Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org 2009-03-13 02:20:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) This implies

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2009-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 --- Comment #9 from Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org 2009-03-12 02:41:42 EDT --- using this generic name I accidentally

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2009-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2009-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-03-12 23:47:14 EDT --- I cannot find anywhere in the source

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2009-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2009-03-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-03-12 01:51:41 EDT --- The generate-tarball.sh script seems to

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2008-12-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 --- Comment #7 from Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-11 04:53:59 EDT --- Removed gsm.h and libgsm.a from the

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2008-12-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2008-11-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-21 08:42:07 EDT --- The name of the license is gpl.txt

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2008-11-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-21 13:08:08 EDT --- I know that other files have that header,

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2008-11-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 --- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-21 13:28:34 EDT --- well, gsm.h from this package contains the

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2008-11-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client

2008-11-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-20 16:33:03 EDT --- This builds fine for me and rpmlint is