[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-24 18:16:28 EDT --- Probably be good to add i18n-team too to initialcc next time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-16 15:16:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #19 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-16 23:18:05 EDT --- Thanks. built and updated comps and wiki as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 04:42:11 EDT --- This one looks good, thank you for your persistence. You can now continue the font package integration process, starting here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Please do not forget the comps and wiki parts. Reassigning the bug to you since my part is done. APPROVED PS Do not forget to subscribe to the low-traffic fedora-fonts-list, since Fedora 11 packaging changes are being discussed there right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 05:37:26 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Nicolas. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hanazono-fonts Short Description: Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-10 F-9 F-8 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 17:01:21 EDT --- (22:32:08) nim-nim: tagoh3: your first fontconfig rule for hanazo is now fine (22:32:20) nim-nim: tagoh3: but the second one is still reversed (22:32:26) nim-nim: tagoh3: you need (22:32:32) nim-nim: alias (22:32:32) nim-nim: family[fontname]/family (22:32:32) nim-nim: default (22:32:32) nim-nim: family[genericname]/family (22:32:32) nim-nim: /default (22:32:32) nim-nim: /alias (22:32:59) nim-nim: with [fontname]=HanaMin (22:33:16) nim-nim: and [genericname]=serif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #15 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 21:01:19 EDT --- Doh! I should have a look carefully more.. Thanks for catching this up! Hopefully this would be a final review for hanazono-fonts. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 03:03:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) Are there so many japanese locales out there you can not use the full ja-FOO code? Because this test will trigger on any locale that contains ja (for example javanese, if fontconfig ever moves to iso639-2 or iso15924) No. maybe better testing jp or do you prefer ja-jp (or ja_jp? dunno) rather than that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 04:19:01 EDT --- If there is only one japanese locale by all means just test on ja-jp (without the contains bit). IIRC that was the locale format that worked for the Chinese people. However, as always with fontconfig, it's a good idea to test before pushing the rules on users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #13 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 20:08:32 EDT --- Sure. Updated. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 22:47:04 EDT --- Sorry, my bad. it works after changing: test name=lang stringja/string /test to: test name=lang compare=contains stringja/string /test Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 02:13:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Sorry, my bad. it works after changing: test name=lang stringja/string /test to: test name=lang compare=contains stringja/string /test Oh, right. didn't catch it sorry. Are there so many japanese locales out there you can not use the full ja-FOO code? Because this test will trigger on any locale that contains ja (for example javanese, if fontconfig ever moves to iso639-2 or iso15924) (don't know if this is a big risk, I think this was a long-term fontconfig plan, Behdad would know) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 03:20:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #3) I've already asked on fedora-legal-list, and just followed him to describe License tag - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html If you could convince spot to publish this on his licenses approved for fonts use wiki page, that would make it easier for the next reviewers. Anyway 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be referenced in release notes Just created: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hanazono_font Nice. You just need to remove the : before Category to activate them (fixed, I must rework the template help, everyone makes the same mistake) 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK fonts should be in the 65-69 range http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there). I'd like to push this font prior to sazanami-mincho.ttf which we defaults for Serif for Japanese, because the quality is better than it. I'm not sure what's the right thing to do that for fontconfig config. that would be appreciated if someone could helps me. Ultimately, Behdad is the best judge of us all on fontconfig stuff. 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use serif fonts to complete HanaMin http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names Fixed in the updated package. Nope, the rule I referenced would have been alias familyHanaMin/family default familyserif/family /default /alias The rule you added is equivalent to the one you already had, without the ja test. The fun thing is that your original rule needs to be placed after conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf to work, and your second rule needs to be placed before, so you can't use both in the same file :p Thus I'd advise to 1. keep your original rule 2. add the one I just wrote 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio 4. test test test 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ≥ Fedora 9 Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing hereafter? It's documented in the comments nobody seems to read :) I'll drop it as soon as Fedora 8 in un-supported. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-2.fc9.src.rpm Appart from the fontconfig bit, you're almost there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 07:16:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) Thus I'd advise to 1. keep your original rule 2. add the one I just wrote 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio 4. test test test Hmm, that seems not working. Sazanami Mincho is still used for Serif somehow. Then does it work with 65? I thought I understood how fontconfig worked, but maybe I'm just another confused user I meant in template file :) Though it may be not worth taking an effort for you because it's going to be EOL'd soon. I'm rewriting all the templates anyway because of the number of multi-font packages we've had to process lately -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 06:52:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Nope, the rule I referenced would have been alias familyHanaMin/family default familyserif/family /default /alias The rule you added is equivalent to the one you already had, without the ja test. Doh, just referred the wrong thing.. :( The fun thing is that your original rule needs to be placed after conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf to work, and your second rule needs to be placed before, so you can't use both in the same file :p Ah, ok. Thus I'd advise to 1. keep your original rule 2. add the one I just wrote 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio 4. test test test Hmm, that seems not working. Sazanami Mincho is still used for Serif somehow. 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ≥ Fedora 9 Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing hereafter? It's documented in the comments nobody seems to read :) I'll drop it as soon as Fedora 8 in un-supported. I meant in template file :) Though it may be not worth taking an effort for you because it's going to be EOL'd soon. BTW just noticed that I can't see any annotations on the template page. I had to do the view source to see. dunno if it's a problem on my browser, or mediawiki's bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-09 21:39:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Since nobody bites, I'll take this. First review pass 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok, you still need spot to approve it and put it on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts See this https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 00:12:08 EDT --- Thank you for taking a review for this package. (In reply to comment #3) 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok, you still need spot to approve it and put it on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts I've already asked on fedora-legal-list, and just followed him to describe License tag - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be referenced in release notes Just created: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hanazono_font 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK fonts should be in the 65-69 range http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there). I'd like to push this font prior to sazanami-mincho.ttf which we defaults for Serif for Japanese, because the quality is better than it. I'm not sure what's the right thing to do that for fontconfig config. that would be appreciated if someone could helps me. 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use serif fonts to complete HanaMin http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names Fixed in the updated package. 6. please send your fontconfig file to hanazano upstream so it's included in their next release once you're happy with it Sure. 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ≥ Fedora 9 Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing hereafter? 8. please use the defattr suggested by guidelines %defattr(644,root,root,755) Sorry, missed one. fixed. 9. it's a little easier to review a package when the fields are in the same order as in rpmdevtool's spectemplate-fonts.spec (cosmetic, you can ignore it, just take it into account for your next font package) Oh, wasn't aware of that. improved a bit in: Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED], ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-09 16:56:39 EDT --- Since nobody bites, I'll take this. First review pass 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok, you still need spot to approve it and put it on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be referenced in release notes (a wiki page template is available there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_description_template ) 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK fonts should be in the 65-69 range http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists Of course Behdad has the last say on this, so if you convince him to ok it I'll let this pass. 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there). 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use serif fonts to complete HanaMin http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names 6. please send your fontconfig file to hanazano upstream so it's included in their next release once you're happy with it 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ≥ Fedora 9 8. please use the defattr suggested by guidelines %defattr(644,root,root,755) 9. it's a little easier to review a package when the fields are in the same order as in rpmdevtool's spectemplate-fonts.spec (cosmetic, you can ignore it, just take it into account for your next font package) All in all this was a pleasant spec file to review and I'll have no problem approving it once those little problems are taken care of → NEEDINFO in the meanwhile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 01:26:17 EDT --- Tested this the other day: rpmlint is clean, but I can't get the font to render default for ja on the desktop when I remove other Japanese fonts. (Tagoh mentioned some update to the font .conf file is needed.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 02:16:07 EDT --- I don't know how you tested it though, this is a Mincho typeface, which is similar to serif. so usually you don't see that on the desktop by default so that most applications defaults sans-serif or monospace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||at.com, ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
