[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-02 13:20:09 EDT --- uml_utilities-20070815-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|20070815-4.fc10 |20070815-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-06 16:52:54 EDT --- uml_utilities-20070815-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/uml_utilities-20070815-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-04 11:25:56 EDT --- uml_utilities-20070815-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED Fixed In Version||20070815-4.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-01 16:45:05 EDT --- uml_utilities-20070815-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/uml_utilities-20070815-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-01 16:54:55 EDT --- uml_utilities-20070815-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/uml_utilities-20070815-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE_PENDING --- Comment #20 from Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com 2009-03-01 18:31:18 EDT --- Thanks everyone. Packages build Except for EL-5, as it seems fuse is not enabled for EL-5 (though the package exists in EL-5, apparently there is no kernel support and therefor userland is not build, and our build fails with a missing fuse-devel dependancy) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-02-28 19:08:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tcall...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #13 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-02-27
10:35:33 EDT ---
%define ver20070815
Please don't do this. Just put that in Version: and use %{version}. It will
simplify the spec.
Also, the license tag is wrong. All of the code simply says GPL, so the tag
should be : License: GPL+
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F
Also, it looks like the Source0 url is wrong, it should be:
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/%{name}_%{version}.tar.bz2
And... ncurses-devel is a Requires of readline-devel, so you shouldn't need to
BuildRequires it.
Aside from that, everything looks fine. I'll finish the review, but please show
me a finished package before I can flip the approved flag.
== Review ==
Good:
- rpmlint checks return:
uml_utilities.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/uml_net root 04755
uml_utilities.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/uml_net 04755
Safe to ignore.
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPL+) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream (4e10de8e0f5bf681fa295572009518b77fd8a1dd)
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291
--- Comment #14 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2009-02-27 16:04:50
EDT ---
Thanks for the review!
(In reply to comment #13)
Please don't do this. Just put that in Version: and use %{version}. It will
simplify the spec.
Fixed.
Also, the license tag is wrong. All of the code simply says GPL, so the tag
should be : License: GPL+
Fixed.
Also, it looks like the Source0 url is wrong, it should be:
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/%{name}_%{version}.tar.bz2
Fixed,
spectool -g SPECS/uml_utilities.spec
works fine now, sha1sum: 4e10de8e0f5bf681fa295572009518b77fd8a1dd
And... ncurses-devel is a Requires of readline-devel, so you shouldn't need to
BuildRequires it.
Fixed. Package builds fine locally using mock and for F10 and F11:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1206294
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1206307
Aside from that, everything looks fine. I'll finish the review, but please
show
me a finished package before I can flip the approved flag.
I've uploaded the new packages:
Spec URL:
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/uml_utilities-20070815-4.fc10.src.rpm
SRPM URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/uml_utilities.spec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-02-27 16:10:10 EDT --- Looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com 2009-02-27 16:14:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: uml_utilities Short Description: Utilities for user-mode linux kernel Owners: pwouters Branches: EL-5, F-9, F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #11 from Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com 2009-02-17 14:28:27 EDT --- I confirmed the package still works for me on x86_64. rpmlint is still fairly quiet: uml_utilities.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/uml_net root 04755 uml_utilities.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/uml_net 04755 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. Thanks for your work Christian! Let's hope we can get this into Fedora soon! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-02-17 15:50:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) I confirmed the package still works for me on x86_64. rpmlint is still fairly quiet: uml_utilities.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/uml_net root 04755 uml_utilities.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/uml_net 04755 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. Thanks for your work Christian! Let's hope we can get this into Fedora soon! uml_net requires suid bit to work , so there erros can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #10 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2009-02-15 15:06:21 EDT --- Based on Pauls work I've created an updated package which addresses all mentioned issues: - build problem - RPM_OPT_FLAGS not honored Spec URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/uml_utilities-20070815-3.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/uml_utilities.spec The package builds successfully in F10 and F11 on the 4 default architectures: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1128542 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1128537 I'm looking forward to the next review cycle. It would be great if the package could be included into Fedora soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(p...@xelerance.co | |m) | --- Comment #9 from Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com 2009-01-17 17:53:46 EDT --- I'll check the things you mentioned. And of course, it built fine for me. I'm using my own package on our dev servers :P -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status Whiteboard||NotReady Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||m) --- Comment #8 from Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 16:13:02 EDT --- - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not honoured: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags E.g.: cc -g -Wall -DTUNTAP -c -o ethertap.o ethertap.c - It does not build here, the Makefile of humsify contains: install -o 0755 $(BIN) $(DESTDIR)$(BIN_DIR) The -o 0755 should probably be -m 0755, which then can be omitted, because it is the default mode used by install. Please make sure that the package builds before submitting it for review. You can use: koji build --scratch dist-f11 *.src.rpm To create a scratch build of the package on koji to verify that it builds. Please remove the NotReady from the Whiteboard once you submitted a SRPM that does at least build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #7 from Paul Wouters [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-09 23:29:59 EDT --- Anyone wants to pick up the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #6 from Paul Wouters [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-02 16:49:15 EDT --- Re: #4: I'm now using the link that's most prominently linked as the download it here link. I also added -q, which indeed resolved the warning. Re: #5: The difference is that I'm making a relative softlink, instead of an absolute one. eg a link to ../lib instead of /usr/lib Spec URL: ftp://ftp.openswan.org/uml_utilities/uml_utilities.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.openswan.org/uml_utilities/uml_utilities-20070815-2.fc9.src.rpm * Sun Nov 2 2008 Paul Wouters [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 20070815-2 - Added -q to setup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291
Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-01
11:10:28 EDT ---
- Source:
- Please use 'Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz' instead of
a link to a mirror
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-01 11:18:04 EDT --- what`s the lasted version ? http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/uml_utilities_20070815.tar.bz2 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291
--- Comment #3 from Paul Wouters [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-01 12:22:52 EDT
---
Thanks for the pointers. The download sites are a complete mess. I hadn't even
noticed there was a newer version until you pointed it out. It is only directly
linked and not accessable via the sf.net downloads pages.
Spec URL: ftp://ftp.openswan.org/uml_utilities/uml_utilities.spec
SRPM URL:
ftp://ftp.openswan.org/uml_utilities/uml_utilities-20070815-1.fc9.src.rpm
* Sat Nov 1 2008 Paul Wouters [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 20070815-1
- Was pointed to newer version of source at obscured location
- Hack out hardcoded stripping of binaries
- -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 no longer needed
rpmlint output:
uml_utilities.src:19: W: setup-not-quiet
uml_utilities.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/uml_net root 04755
uml_utilities.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/uml_net 04755
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings.
I am not sure why setup is not quiet, since all it contains is:
%setup -n tools-%{ver}
which only untars the source without an error.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291
--- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-01
14:34:07 EDT ---
try
%setup -q -n tools-%{ver}
the Source0 is very strange, looks like jdike and blaisorblade is not using
sourceforge to host files, the best options is ask where are located the
lasted version and what's the right address for downloading it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291
--- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-01
14:50:53 EDT ---
what's the difference between
this:
mylib=`echo %{_libdir} | sed s/\/usr//`
ln -s ..$mylib/uml/port-helper $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/port-helper
and this :
ln -s %{_libdir}/uml/port-helper $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/port-helper
?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
