[Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12

2009-11-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934


Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW)
 Resolution||NOTABUG




--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu  2009-11-07 20:28:41 
EDT ---
Given nearly four months of silence, I'm going to assume that's a big no and
close this out.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12

2009-07-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934





--- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu  2009-07-14 18:21:08 EDT 
---
Well, it's been eight months; has there been any progress?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12

2008-12-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934





--- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de  2008-12-13 03:07:19 
EDT ---
 http://www.gnu-m68hc11.org/m68hc11_inst_ptc.php
/me thinks, this page is obsolete, for 2 reasons:

* the person listed as contact (Stephane C.), is the m68hc11/12 target's
maintainer of the FSF toolchain.
* Almost all packages referenced on this page are _way_ outdated.

May-be you should contact him before proceeding with this package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12

2008-12-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934





--- Comment #8 from Brennan Ashton bash...@brennanashton.com  2008-12-13 
11:38:23 EDT ---
Yes, I have seen people using the 4.3 gcc, so I am working on building that
right now.  I will do some tests on actual hardware to verify.  That other
project has gone though states of being maintained and not it looks like, and
many of the important links are broken.

Right now I am having issues with getting gcc to compile, there has been some
change in the Fedora gcc, and it has broken even the good avr-gcc package
building.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12

2008-12-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934





--- Comment #2 from Brennan Ashton bash...@brennanashton.com  2008-12-12 
03:26:06 EDT ---
please hold off reviewing this as the gcc part that needs this may need to use
a newer version, due to a gcc 4 incompatibility with building gcc 3 and the
crosscompiler upstream work being done on gcc 3

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12

2008-12-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934


Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rc040...@freenet.de




--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de  2008-12-12 09:38:41 
EDT ---
Are you sure you want to ship something such kind of outdated as binutils-2.15?

To my knowledge (I have never used it), the m6812 is actively maintained in
upstream binutils and supported out of the box in current version of binutils
(2.19).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12

2008-12-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934





--- Comment #4 from Brennan Ashton bash...@brennanashton.com  2008-12-12 
10:17:43 EDT ---
my understanding is they have kind of a strange development cycle. You have
gcc/binuilts upstream that is doing there work, and then you have another GNU
project that works on it as well. They have a fairly large patch set, but are
maintaining it for the gcc 3.3.5 and binutils, these included new test cases
and some things that they call stability fixed what ever that means. These
are slowly pulled into upstream.  I want to look into this more and do some
real hardware tests before someone spends the time to review this package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12

2008-12-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934





--- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de  2008-12-12 12:44:02 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 my understanding is they have kind of a strange development cycle.
Who is they?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12

2008-12-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934





--- Comment #6 from Brennan Ashton bash...@brennanashton.com  2008-12-12 
19:25:17 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
 (In reply to comment #4)
  my understanding is they have kind of a strange development cycle.
 Who is they?

Those in charge of the m6812 part of gcc.  The group that I am talking about
that has the patches is http://www.gnu-m68hc11.org/m68hc11_inst_ptc.php

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12

2008-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934





--- Comment #1 from Brennan Ashton [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-12-11 01:16:19 EDT 
---
koji built fine:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=992757

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review