[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls

2009-01-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2009-01-25 
02:57:10 EDT ---
Closing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2009-01-16 
12:01:33 EDT ---
It seems you reversed the following?

(In reply to comment #2)
 For 0.0.1-1:
 
 * Documents
   - README.txt should be marked as %doc.

What I mean is that %files should be

%dir %{geminstdir}
%doc %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]*
%{geminstdir}/*/

or so.

Other things are okay.
-
   This package (rubygem-tlsmail) is APPROVED by mtasaka
-

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360





--- Comment #11 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com  2009-01-16 13:04:12 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
 It seems you reversed the following?
 
 (In reply to comment #2)
  For 0.0.1-1:
  
  * Documents
- README.txt should be marked as %doc.
 
 What I mean is that %files should be
 
 %dir %{geminstdir}
 %doc %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]*
 %{geminstdir}/*/
 
 or so.
 
 Other things are okay.
 -
This package (rubygem-tlsmail) is APPROVED by mtasaka
 -

Thanks. I've changed the RPM per your final suggestions. Thank you, and I'll
begin your review tomorro.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360


Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #12 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com  2009-01-16 13:07:33 
EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: rubygem-tlsmail
Short Description: This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls
Owners: mcpierce
Branches: F-9 F-10
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360


Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com  2009-01-16 22:18:34 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls

2009-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360





--- Comment #7 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com  2009-01-15 10:05:46 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
 Well, there are still many files in binary rpm which have
 CRLF line terminators as
 
 $ rpm -ql rubygem-tlsmail | xargs file | grep CRLF
 
 shows (although rpmlint does not seem to be able to detect these)

Here's an update with those CRLF issues fixed:

Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-tlsmail.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-tlsmail-0.0.1-3.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls

2009-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360





--- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2009-01-15 
12:33:10 EDT ---
Well, sorry for not pointing out before, however:

- now you defined %gemdocsdir, it is better that you use this macro
  also on %files

- Also you use %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ in %files, while
  %{geminstdir} is also used in %files.

- Now build.log warns about:
---
warning: File listed twice:
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tlsmail-0.0.1/README.txt
---

- In %changelog, please use %% instead of single % (i.e. %%doc, for
  example) to aviod macros from being expanded.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls

2009-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360





--- Comment #9 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com  2009-01-15 15:09:41 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
 Well, sorry for not pointing out before, however:
 
 - now you defined %gemdocsdir, it is better that you use this macro
   also on %files
 
 - Also you use %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ in %files, while
   %{geminstdir} is also used in %files.
 
 - Now build.log warns about:
 ---
 warning: File listed twice:
 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tlsmail-0.0.1/README.txt
 ---
 
 - In %changelog, please use %% instead of single % (i.e. %%doc, for
   example) to aviod macros from being expanded.

The above points have been fixed:

SPEC URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-tlsmail.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-tlsmail-0.0.1-4.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls

2009-01-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360





--- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2009-01-06 
11:33:39 EDT ---
Well, there are still many files in binary rpm which have
CRLF line terminators as

$ rpm -ql rubygem-tlsmail | xargs file | grep CRLF

shows (although rpmlint does not seem to be able to detect these)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls

2009-01-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360





--- Comment #5 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com  2009-01-05 11:21:45 
EDT ---
Updated with requested changes:
Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-tlsmail.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-tlsmail-0.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls

2009-01-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360





--- Comment #4 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com  2009-01-05 11:00:37 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
 * Possibly duplicate/conflicting files with system ones
   - This rpm contains net/pop.rb, net/smtp.rb. These are
 already included in ruby-libs rpm (however the files
 in ruby-libs seems older than those in this rpm).
 Can these files safely installed in parallel?

That is the point of this gem - it's providing alternatives to those classes in
Ruby. But it only overrides them if you explicitly require the tlsmail gem in
your code.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls

2008-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360





--- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2008-12-26 
09:55:11 EDT ---
For 0.0.1-1:

* Documents
  - Would you check if Rakefile or Manifest.txt really needed?
  - README.txt should be marked as %doc.

* Possibly duplicate/conflicting files with system ones
  - This rpm contains net/pop.rb, net/smtp.rb. These are
already included in ruby-libs rpm (however the files
in ruby-libs seems older than those in this rpm).
Can these files safely installed in parallel?

* CRLF line terminators
  - Some ruby scripts in this rpm have CRLF line terminators
(although my rpmlint could not detect them...)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls

2008-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360





--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2008-12-26 
10:02:13 EDT ---
Oops..

* ruby abi requirement
  - Also ruby(abi) requirement is needed.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls

2008-12-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2008-12-26 
02:56:22 EDT ---
I will review this. Instead I would appreciate it if you
would review my review request for rubygem-nokogiri (bug 477883)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review