[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||0.78.2.1-9.fc10
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770





--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-03-27 10:54:11 EDT ---
spring-0.78.2.1-9.fc10, springlobby-0.0.1.10425-1.fc10,
spring-installer-20090316-4.fc10, spring-maps-default-0.1-5.fc10 has been
pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770





--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-03-23 11:55:27 EDT ---
spring-0.78.2.1-9.fc10, springlobby-0.0.1.10425-1.fc10,
spring-installer-20090316-4.fc10, spring-maps-default-0.1-5.fc10 has been
pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update spring springlobby
spring-installer spring-maps-default'.  You can provide feedback for this
update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2941

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770





--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-03-22 09:00:03 EDT ---
spring-0.78.2.1-9.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spring-0.78.2.1-9.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770





--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-03-22 10:49:08 EDT ---
spring-0.78.2.1-9.fc10,springlobby-0.0.1.10425-1.fc10,spring-installer-20090316-4.fc10,spring-maps-default-0.1-5.fc10
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spring-0.78.2.1-9.fc10,springlobby-0.0.1.10425-1.fc10,spring-installer-20090316-4.fc10,spring-maps-default-0.1-5.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770





--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-03-18 06:37:13 EDT ---
spring-maps-default-0.1-4.fc10,spring-installer-20090316-3.fc10,springlobby-0.0.1.10429-4.fc10,spring-0.78.2.1-8.fc10
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spring-maps-default-0.1-4.fc10,spring-installer-20090316-3.fc10,springlobby-0.0.1.10429-4.fc10,spring-0.78.2.1-8.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA




--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-03-18 15:09:00 EDT ---
spring-maps-default-0.1-4.fc10, spring-installer-20090316-3.fc10,
springlobby-0.0.1.10429-4.fc10, spring-0.78.2.1-8.fc10 has been pushed to the
Fedora 10 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of
it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update spring-maps-default
spring-installer springlobby spring'.  You can provide feedback for this update
here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2819

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770


Aurelien Bompard gau...@free.fr changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #15 from Aurelien Bompard gau...@free.fr  2009-03-17 17:12:41 EDT 
---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: springlobby
Short Description: Lobby client for the spring RTS game engine
Owners: abompard
Branches: F-10
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770


Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com  2009-03-17 23:21:36 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770





--- Comment #9 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com  2009-03-16 06:05:45 
EDT ---
- Their source docs tell that it is licensed under GPL without any version:
http://springlobby.info/repositories/entry/springlobby/doc/mainpage.dox
http://docs.springlobby.info/main.html
This makes actual license GPLv3 (as combination of GPL+, GPLv3+ and LGPLv3).
I think, we can do that change and proceed.

Upstream should be notified, and change texts to match actual license or
whatever they like in many places:
http://springlobby.info/wiki/springlobby/FeaturesGoals
https://launchpad.net/springlobby
http://en.opensuse.org/SpringLobby

As with spring-installer, best if they will have license info in README and
standard header in every file.


- Add hicolor-icon-theme to requires to have proper icon directories ownership.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770





--- Comment #10 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com  2009-03-16 06:42:15 
EDT ---
- Package snippets changed in new guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770





--- Comment #11 from Aurelien Bompard gau...@free.fr  2009-03-16 07:16:32 EDT 
---
I've asked upstream to clarify their license version:
http://springlobby.info/issues/show/810
In the meantime, I've set the license tag to GPLv2 and GPLv3, because
settings++ is actually a separate application (spring engine configurator),
that is launched from the springlobby menu.

* Mon Mar 16 2009 Aurelien Bompard abomp...@fedoraproject.org 0.0.1.10429-3
- new scriptlets for the icon cache
- require hicolor-icon-theme

http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/springlobby-0.0.1.10429-3.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770


Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|ianwel...@gmail.com |atork...@gmail.com




--- Comment #12 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com  2009-03-16 07:47:06 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
 In the meantime, I've set the license tag to GPLv2 and GPLv3, because
 settings++ is actually a separate application (spring engine configurator),
 that is launched from the springlobby menu.

No, it should be GPLv3 as they are linking sources from springlobby and
settings together.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770





--- Comment #13 from Aurelien Bompard gau...@free.fr  2009-03-16 09:21:21 EDT 
---
Okay

* Mon Mar 16 2009 Aurelien Bompard abomp...@fedoraproject.org 0.0.1.10429-4
- fix license tag

http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/springlobby-0.0.1.10429-4.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770


Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #14 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com  2009-03-16 10:36:39 
EDT ---
Here goes full review:

+ rpmlint output clean.
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
  %{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
  Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ Source package does not includes the text of the license(s) in its own file.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
  provided in the spec URL.
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
  one primary architecture.
+ Architectures where package does not successfully compile, build or work are
  listed in ExcludeArch.

Bugs should be filled against all 4 spring packages after their acceptance and
added to FE-ExcludeArch-ppc{,64} tracker:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Architecture_Build_Failures

+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
+ The spec file handles locales properly.
+ Package does not store shared libraries.
+ The package does not designed to be relocatable.
+ A package owns all directories that it creates.
+ A package does not list a file more than once in the spec %files listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
+ Does not contain large documentation files.
+ Includes only doc files in %doc.
+ No headers.
+ No static libraries.
+ The package does not contain pkgconfig(.pc) files.
+ The package does not contain library files with a suffix (e.g.
  libfoo.so.1.1).
+ No devel packages.
+ The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
+ Package includes %{name}.desktop file. Properly installed with
desktop-file-install.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
  packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
+ All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8.
+ The package builds in mock.
+ A package does not segfault instead of running.


This package is APPROVED, cvs creation should delayed until all four spring
packages are accepted.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770





--- Comment #5 from Aurelien Bompard gau...@free.fr  2009-03-15 14:10:51 EDT 
---
* Sun Mar 15 2009 Aurelien Bompard abomp...@fedoraproject.org 0.0.1.10429-1
- version 10429

http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/springlobby-0.0.1.10429-1.fc10.src.rpm
 

About the BuildRequires, they are just taken verbatim from the source install
page: http://springlobby.info/wiki/springlobby/InstallFromSource
I guessed if upstream mentioned them, I should add them too. Do you think I
should remove them ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770


Ian Weller ianwel...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(ianwel...@gmail.c |
   |om) |




--- Comment #6 from Ian Weller ianwel...@gmail.com  2009-03-15 14:13:45 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #5)
 I guessed if upstream mentioned them, I should add them too. Do you think I
 should remove them ?  

yes :)

if things don't work, testing can make that more obvious.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770





--- Comment #7 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com  2009-03-15 15:36:53 
EDT ---
The sources contain some files that are GPLv3+ in settings++ and base64.cpp
that is LGPLv3. But your License tag is GPLv2 (without plus). If upstream
really wants to distribute it under second version of GPL there is license
incompatibility. But perhaps, there is simple error. If so, change License tag
to GPLv3.

Remove ChangeLog from %doc too. It doesn't have any relation to this
application.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770





--- Comment #8 from Aurelien Bompard gau...@free.fr  2009-03-15 17:47:13 EDT 
---
* Sun Mar 15 2009 Aurelien Bompard abomp...@fedoraproject.org 0.0.1.10429-2
- drop the version in the buildrequires
- don't package ChangeLog as %%doc

About the licensing, it's probably an error. The website says « License is GPL
2 (free as in freedom) »
(http://springlobby.info/wiki/springlobby/FeaturesGoals)

http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/springlobby-0.0.1.10429-2.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770


Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||atork...@gmail.com




--- Comment #3 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com  2009-03-14 13:40:42 
EDT ---
Old version of source is deleted. Could you update the package?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-03-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770





--- Comment #4 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com  2009-03-14 13:47:22 
EDT ---
Also, versioned BuildRequires seem to be excessive.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770


Aurelien Bompard gau...@free.fr changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||needinfo?(ianwel...@gmail.c
   ||om)




--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Bompard gau...@free.fr  2009-02-03 18:02:30 EDT 
---
* Tue Feb 03 2009 Aurelien Bompard abomp...@fedoraproject.org 0.0.1.10393-1
- version 10393
- add patch to detect libunitsync.so properly
- drop workaround for bug 478589

http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/springlobby-0.0.1.10393-1.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-01-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770





--- Comment #1 from Aurelien Bompard gau...@free.fr  2009-01-17 10:22:34 EDT 
---
* Sat Jan 17 2009 Aurelien Bompard abomp...@fedoraproject.org 0.0.1.10387-1
- version 10387
- remove vendor from the desktop file

New SRPM:
http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/springlobby-0.0.1.10387-1.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770


Ian Weller ianwel...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||ianwel...@gmail.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ianwel...@gmail.com
   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine

2009-01-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770


Aurelien Bompard gau...@free.fr changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||478767




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review