[Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations

2009-02-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860


Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net  2009-02-20 
06:51:31 EDT ---
Was pushed to stable

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1328
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1251

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations

2009-02-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA




--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-02-04 21:12:28 EDT ---
timespan-2.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update timespan'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1251

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations

2009-02-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860





--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-02-04 21:19:55 EDT ---
timespan-2.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update timespan'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1328

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860





--- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net  2009-01-29 
08:39:28 EDT ---
I don't need a sponsor but thanks for the review.  You should mention this
informal review to find a sponsor for yourself.  For more details check out
this page [1].  For RH employees is the 'seeking sponsor' procedure a bit
different than for Fedora contributors. 

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860


Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lkund...@v3.sk
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lkund...@v3.sk
   Flag||fedora-review+




--- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk  2009-01-29 13:03:33 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
 I don't need a sponsor but thanks for the review.  You should mention this
 informal review to find a sponsor for yourself.  For more details check out
 this page [1].  For RH employees is the 'seeking sponsor' procedure a bit
 different than for Fedora contributors. 
 
 [1] 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account

I think the sponsoring procedure is the same, just the CLA signing part is
different.

I think Peter's review was fairly exhaustive and package simple and correct as
well. Thank you both!

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860


Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net  2009-01-29 
13:18:50 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: timespan
Short Description: A tool that performs date-based time calculations
Owners: fab
Branches: F-9 F-10
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860


Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com  2009-01-30 01:27:55 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations

2009-01-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860


Petr Sklenar pskle...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pskle...@redhat.com




--- Comment #4 from Petr Sklenar pskle...@redhat.com  2009-01-28 10:45:55 EDT 
---
Hello,
This is my informal review. I cannot sponsor you as I'm not an approved
packager. Your package and specfile seems OK for me:

My review:

+ rpmlint output is clean.
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec. There is timespan.spec.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
GPLv2+
+ There is license in separate file in %doc :
/usr/share/doc/timespan-2.1/COPYING
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL (md5sum timespan-2.1.tar.gz  c9d545eb5f617b29b3a634d7a0aec39a
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ There isn't duplicate files in the %files listing.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
+ Package doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All file names in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
architectures.

+ I did a limited test that the package functions as described, like
'/usr/bin/timespan -l now'
+ Summary and description corresponds package's home.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations

2009-01-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860





--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net  2009-01-27 
07:35:13 EDT ---
Usually I like the freedom to choose from several applications with similar
functionality but your reason not to go on with this review is quite good.  I
don't want to waste your time.  Let's drop this review request.

At the other hand it's a simple package and a simple review.  Maybe a person
who is seeking a sponsor would like to review this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations

2009-01-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860


manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
 CC||wo...@nobugconsulting.ro
 AssignedTo|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro|nob...@fedoraproject.org
   Flag|fedora-review?  |




--- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro  2009-01-27 
07:53:19 EDT ---
I am sorry , I did not want to imply that there is a problem or something. It's
just that I simply find it useless.

I like your idea with leaving this review for someone seeking for sponsorship.
Unassigning...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations

2009-01-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860


manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro  2009-01-26 
20:21:52 EDT ---
are you sure you want to submit this? the standard date command does
everything this tool does, and much much more. info date - examples for a
quick grasp

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review