[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-03-24 08:27:59 EDT --- Awesome, thanks for you review and font education. Orion, I'll take over the new package. You want co-maintainership? New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gnu-free-fonts Short Description: Free UCS Outline Fonts Owners: limb Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #21 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2009-03-24 09:31:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) Awesome, thanks for you review and font education. Orion, I'll take over the new package. You want co-maintainership? Works for me. New Package CVS Request == Package Name: gnu-free-fonts Short Description: Free UCS Outline Fonts Owners: limb orion Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-24 13:34:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-03-24 14:30:52 EDT --- Imported and built. Bugs for known dependant packages updated. freefont EOL ticket updated. Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net | |) | --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-03-23 11:34:08 EDT --- SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-10.fc10.src.rpm Fixed, and I moved closer to the template. I agree that this is getting old, but I'm learning font packaging as I go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net |l...@jcomserv.net Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-23 17:58:38 EDT --- Ok, this one looks good. Can't test it fully because of bug #491764 but it passes my other tests ♼♼♼ APPROVED ♼♼♼ Please make sure the other steps in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages#Source_package_naming_changes are taken care of. Also I think you deserve at least co-maintainership of the new package. Congratulations This is about the worst-case font packaging scenario you can get in Fedora so if you don't forget what you've learnt here you should be able to package about any font now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #19 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2009-03-23 18:03:52 EDT --- Oh, I'd love to give this package up to whoever wants it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net ||) --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-21 05:50:58 EDT --- And now you have another kind of dangling symlink /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-gnu-free-mono.conf - /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/gnu-free-mono.conf Would it be so hard to just use the pattern documented in the official spec templates instead of exploring every possible broken alternative? This is getting really old. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-03-20 09:08:39 EDT --- I feel your pain. :) SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-9.fc10.src.rpm Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net ||) --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-19 14:31:17 EDT --- Ok, you're producing the right package names at last But you compat package is still requiring package names that do not match what you build And if you look in /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/ you'll see the files you pack do not match what other packages do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net | |) | --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-03-19 15:08:04 EDT --- facepalm I fixed the Requires. I see nothing in /u/s/fc/conf.avail, do you mean /etc/fonts/conf.avail? If so, my files resemble those, but are not so complex. They're a straight filling in of a template. If they need enhancement or alteration, I'm not sure where to go next with them, as I have only a vague idea what these files do, and not much idea *how*. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-19 16:36:24 EDT --- Sorry, I was not clear. -ENOSLEEP Your spec produces dangling symlinks that won't work, such as /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-gnu-free-sans.conf - /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/gnu-free-sans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net | |) | --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-03-18 09:17:53 EDT --- Fixed 1, 2, 3, and 4. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-8.fc10.src.rpm Re the symlinks, why do we use absolute and not relative symlinks in font pacakges? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-18 09:34:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) Re the symlinks, why do we use absolute and not relative symlinks in font pacakges? Because it's simpler and FPC already decided the rpmlint warning about absolute symlinks was trashable. But they're ok not requiring our rpmlint packager to remove it and having people waste their time in reviews over it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net
||)
--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-14
14:52:33 EDT ---
Another pass:
1. you're not defining fontname as intended by the template and as a result you
have weird package names such as gnu-free-fonts-mono-fonts instead of a nice
gnu-free-mono-fonts
fontname shoud not have the same value as name or we would not bother with it
2. your fontconfig symlinks are broken
lrw-r--r--1 rootroot 52 mars 14 19:35
/etc/fonts/conf.d/60-gnu-free-fonts-mono.conf -
/usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/gnu-free-fonts-m
ono
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 334 mars 5 21:46
/usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-gnu-free-fonts-mono.conf
It would probably simpler if you just used the symlinking logic proposed by the
template
3. Your compat package
Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freemono-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freesans-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freeserif-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
But your srpm generates subpackages named differently, so it won't work
4. rpmlint points some minor problems
W: spelling-error-in-description compatability compatibility
E: description-line-too-long This package only exists to help transition pre
20090104-4 freefotn users to the new\
W: summary-not-capitalized freefont compatibility package
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-03-09 09:41:31 EDT --- Fixed. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||479238 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net | |) | --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-03-05 11:55:23 EDT --- Corrected all but 9. Can't test if 9 is needed in rawhide as mock builds are failing at the yum step with 404s, even with a fresh root cache. Probably a temporary issue. rel-eng ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1225 Otherwise I *think * I hit all your points. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-03-05 13:45:44 EDT --- Sorted out mock. Yup, it needs -lang=ff. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-05
15:13:58 EDT ---
We're getting there :)
1. you still have at least one %define in common_desc (probably did not notice
it because you've reordered the template)
2.you still have a needless group declaration in your common package
3. you should simplify your subpackage names (for example use
%{fontname}-mono-fonts instead of %{fontname}-freemono-fonts). Repeating the
project name does not really help users.
4. you need to drop
Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freemono-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freesans-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freeserif-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: freefont 20090104-2
from your main package
5. you probably don't need to obsolete package names that were never pushed to
user systems, this obsolete data will never be used
6. you don't need
%dir %{_fontdir}
in your common package
7. you can unroll the for loop, but if you do so make sure you don't reference
the for variable anymore
8. your fontconfig rule filenames need to start with a number to work (in your
case 60 is probably fine, see
/usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-priorities.txt)
9. your fontconfig rules won't work if you just put the font name everywhere
blindly. See /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-generics.txt and
/usr/share/fontconfig/templates/basic-font-template.txt
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-03-05 15:53:44 EDT --- Better? SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-03-05 19:12:09 EDT --- *** Bug 479238 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh
||at.com
Depends on||212079
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
Flag||fedora-review?,
||needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net
||)
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-02
17:18:04 EDT ---
Thank you very much for working on this. Here is a first review pass:
1. FPC and FESCO have decided %global was preferred over %define. The changes
are in fontpackages 1.20, please apply them
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define
2. Please try to keep the same declaration order as the templates, that makes
diffing reviewing easier
3. Please do not make a metapackage of the main package, if you need a
metapackage for upgrade paths create a -compat subpackage that we'll be able to
kill at F12 time
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages#Can.27t_I_use_my_old_package_name_instead_of_a_-compat_subpackage.3F
vera, mgopen, dejavu, liberation, etc all use this proven pattern
4. you can probably drop the
Obsoletes: freefont-ttf %{version}-%{release}
freefont has been named freefont in Fedora for quite a long time
5. In rawhide you can drop the
Group:User Interface/X
declarations in subpackages
6. use the
%package -n %{fontname}-FAMILY-fonts
%description -n %{fontname}-FAMILY-fonts
%_font_pkg -n FAMILY -f %{fontconf}-FAMILY.conf NAME*.ttf
which is documented in the templates if you want stuff to actually work
7. put doc in the common package, that's one of its main uses
8. BuildRequire fontforge
9. You'll likely hit
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-February/msg00076.html
too
10. Please add fontconfig rules to each font subpackages. In your case that's
probably just taking the
/usr/share/fontconfig/templates/basic-font-template.conf
template and filling in font names
11. Please also make sure you've not forgotten a step in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages#Source_package_naming_changes
That's all I see right now, I may have missed something else, multi-font
packages can be trickier than mono-font ones. But first fix this please
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
