[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-12-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876





--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-12-01 13:26:24 EDT ---
php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-12-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||1.0.2b1-3.el5
 Resolution||ERRATA




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-11-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876





--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-11-25 10:27:12 EDT ---
php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-11-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA




--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-11-05 16:28:08 EDT ---
php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pecl-gmagick'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0795

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876





--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-11-04 06:39:05 EDT ---
php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.fc11

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876





--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-11-04 06:46:53 EDT ---
php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
5.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-11-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876





--- Comment #5 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net  2009-11-03 
05:08:06 EDT ---
OK: rpmlint must be run on every package

rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-2.fc11.src.rpm
rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-2.fc11.i586.rpm 
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
OK: The spec file name must match the base package
OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license
OK: License text included
OK: The spec file must be written in American English
FIX: The spec file for the package MUST be legible
OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture
N\A: ExcludeArch
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
N\A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly
N\A: Must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
N\A: If the package is designed to be relocatable
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly
OK: Each package must have a %clean section
FIX: Each package must consistently use macros
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content
N\A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application
N\A: Header files must be in a -devel package
N\A: Static libraries must be in a -static package
N\A: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
N\A: Library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package
N\A: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package
OK: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives
N\A: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file
OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages
OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8


Issues to fix.

* Consistent use of macros
 - if using the %{__make} style macros then you need to be consistent, i.e use
%{__install}, %{__rm}, %{__chmod} etc

* Make the spec more eligible by formatting it correctly, at the moment the
directives at the top are not aligned.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-11-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876





--- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info  
2009-11-03 05:29:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
 * Consistent use of macros
  - if using the %{__make} style macros then you need to be consistent, i.e use
 %{__install}, %{__rm}, %{__chmod} etc
%{__make} replaced to plain make.

Additionally %{?_smp_mflags} added.

 * Make the spec more eligible by formatting it correctly, at the moment the
 directives at the top are not aligned.  
Top directives are ALIGNED with tabs by width 5 spaces. Please read my first
post.

http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/php-pecl-gmagick/php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.fc11.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-11-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876


Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #7 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net  2009-11-03 
05:38:43 EDT ---
The %{__make} install needs to be fixed as well, you can do that before
requesting CVS

---
This package (php-pecl-gmagick) is APPROVED by topdog
---

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-11-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876





--- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info  
2009-11-03 06:03:49 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
 The %{__make} install needs to be fixed as well, you can do that before
 requesting CVS

Upss, sorry. Thanks, I'll fix it.

 ---
 This package (php-pecl-gmagick) is APPROVED by topdog
 ---  

Thank you for review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-11-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876


Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info  
2009-11-03 09:56:00 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: php-pecl-gmagick
Short Description: Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library
Owners: hubbitus
Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-11-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876


Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com  2009-11-03 14:11:08 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-11-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876


Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||and...@topdog.za.net
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|and...@topdog.za.net
   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-11-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876





--- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net  2009-11-02 
01:51:29 EDT ---
I will do a full review of this later today.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-11-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876


Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-10-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876





--- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info  
2009-10-11 16:44:26 EDT ---
Author include license by my request and update tarball.

http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/php-pecl-gmagick/php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-2.fc11.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-10-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876


Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||thom...@fedoraproject.org




--- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org  2009-10-04 
09:28:35 EDT ---
MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the
review.

[tho...@tusdell ~]$ rpmlint srpm-review-test/php-pecl-gmagick.spec
srpm-review-test/php-pecl-gmagick.spec: E: specfile-error sh: php-config:
command not found
srpm-review-test/php-pecl-gmagick.spec: E: specfile-error error: Macro
%php_extdir has empty body
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings.


-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library

2009-10-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876





--- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info  
2009-10-04 11:56:01 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
 sh: php-config:
 command not found

You simply does not have php-devel installed. If you install this package erro
must be gone. php-devel listed as BR, so nothing error there.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review