[Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-14 13:10 EST --- Maintainer is OK with the change as per previous conversation with him. Package Change Request == Package Name: liblrdf New Branches: EL-5 Owners for new branch: green,lkundrak cvsextras commits for new branch: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-14 15:36 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-11 17:07 EST --- I'd be very thiankful if you could request and maintain a EPEL-5 branch for this package. In case you don't want or can't do that, let me know and I'll do that. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||190040 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|190040 | OtherBugsDependingO||190040 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 18:52 EST --- Perhaps this package should own /usr/share/ladspa/rdf, and ladspa could own /usr/share/ladspa Common practice among packagers seems to be to _either_ require a package which owns the directories _or_ to own the directories yourself. Here, however, the file is installed from within the examples directory for rdf_uri load tests and is not required at run-time. At build-time it is not adjusted to be in sync with the plugins found in the ladspa package. In liblrdf there's also no run-time dependency on the LADSPA_RDF_PATH /usr/share/ladspa/rdf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review