[Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf

2008-04-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: liblrdf


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189313


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-14 13:10 EST ---
Maintainer is OK with the change as per previous conversation with him.

Package Change Request
==
Package Name: liblrdf
New Branches: EL-5
Owners for new branch: green,lkundrak
cvsextras commits for new branch: yes

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf

2008-04-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: liblrdf


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189313


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-14 15:36 EST ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf

2008-04-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: liblrdf


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189313


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|devel   |rawhide

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-11 17:07 EST ---
I'd be very thiankful if you could request and maintain a EPEL-5 branch for this
package. In case you don't want or can't do that, let me know and I'll do that.

Thanks!


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf

2007-09-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: liblrdf


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189313


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |medium
   Priority|normal  |medium
Product|Fedora Extras   |Fedora




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf

2006-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: liblrdf


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  BugsThisDependsOn||190040




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf

2006-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: liblrdf


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  BugsThisDependsOn|190040  |
OtherBugsDependingO||190040
  nThis||




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf

2006-04-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: liblrdf


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-26 18:52 EST ---
 Perhaps this package should own
 /usr/share/ladspa/rdf, and ladspa could own /usr/share/ladspa 

Common practice among packagers seems to be to _either_ require
a package which owns the directories _or_ to own the directories
yourself.

Here, however, the file is installed from within the examples
directory for rdf_uri load tests and is not required at run-time.
At build-time it is not adjusted to be in sync with the plugins
found in the ladspa package. In liblrdf there's also no run-time
dependency on the LADSPA_RDF_PATH /usr/share/ladspa/rdf


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review