[Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-21 17:47 EST --- thanks for the review, branched and built will go out with next push -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-21 16:31 EST --- OK then. I am just following the guidelines :-) However, I will APPROVE the submission as is. Please do not forget to close this review once its been imported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-21 07:23 EST --- Re: comment #5. I support Dennis' comment. The fdo icon spec only requires "touch"ing the affected icon dirs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-21 07:14 EST --- I wont fix the %post/%postun there is no need to add gnome cruft to a kde package. and as has been stated in quite a few package reviews and there is a bug filed gtk-update-icon-cache should be run as a cron job not in packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-21 04:48 EST --- Hello.. I will review this package for you.. Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source kmobiletools-0.4.3.3.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK Needs work: * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %post (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %postun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) Package looks pretty good. If you fix up the %post/%postun scriplets, I can approve this submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-17 23:18 EST --- kmobiletools doesnt do everything. it does not provide a way to put pictures and files on you phone or to take them off. It allows you to manage sms and phone book -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-17 18:42 EST --- As a mobile phone user, I think this would be a great tool to add. I am trying moto4lin which works with my Motorla phone but it would be better to have a full tools available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-09 09:47 EST --- DEFINE QT Dirs to ensure build is ok Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/kmobiletools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ausil.us/packages/kmobiletools-0.4.3.3-2.src.rpm also not 100% sure is I should include a udev ruleset. the couple of mobile phones i have tried use /dev/ttyACM0 which gets [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ ls -la /dev/ttyACM0 crw-rw 1 root uucp 166, 0 May 9 08:32 /dev/ttyACM0 so the user cant access the phone. the two things that can make it easier is 1 making the owner the logged in user or 2 make the users needing access members of the uucp group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
