[Bug 194479] Review Request: php-idn

2006-06-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-idn


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194479





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-18 15:32 EST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Are we allowed to approve php packages now?  I thought we were still waiting 
> for
> finished guidelines and an update of the core PHP package.

Not that I know of, besides there are alreayd plenty of php packages in extras.
I've read nothing of what you're suggesting. Do you have some pointers for this?



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 194479] Review Request: php-idn

2006-06-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-idn


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194479





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-18 11:42 EST ---
Jason, didn't I get something or am I lacking any information? I applied last 
must fix before comment #5, FE-ACCEPT was added with comment #6. After getting 
sponsored, I just followed the rest of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/
ReviewGuidelines#head-f3a5010530b260ae2b3d8c835cc6d25e9ac91ceb 

Are there any blockers, show stoppers or further guidelines I'm not aware of? 
And as I'm new to that kind of the FE stuff, I'm very confused now...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 194479] Review Request: php-idn

2006-06-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-idn


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194479





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-18 11:26 EST ---
Are we allowed to approve php packages now?  I thought we were still waiting for
finished guidelines and an update of the core PHP package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 194479] Review Request: php-idn

2006-06-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-idn


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194479


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-18 11:01 EST ---
11171 (php-idn): Build on target fedora-5-extras succeeded.
11172 (php-idn): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded.

as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors I'll close this
bug report with NEXTRELEASE now. If I did something wrong or when I missed 
something, just tell me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 194479] Review Request: php-idn

2006-06-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-idn


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194479


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841  |163779
  nThis||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-17 08:39 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> One line from your comment was trunicated, but I found the complete hack in 
> php-
> eaccelerator: %((echo %{default_apiver}; php -i 2>/dev/null | sed -n 's/^PHP 
> API 
> => //p') | tail -1) - it is applied very similar as suggested.

Aai, sorry about that cut and paste error. Glad you found the full hack 
yourself.
That fixes the only MUST fix item -> Approved.

And I must say I'm happy with the shown packageing skills sofat and thus I am
willing to sponsor you, go create an account in the account system as described
here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors

And then I'll sponsor you after which you can continue with step described at
the above URL. You need to find another reviewer for you other 2 packages
though, I'm no good in perl and ircbots aren't my thing either :)



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 194479] Review Request: php-idn

2006-06-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-idn


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194479





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-17 08:02 EST ---
One line from your comment was trunicated, but I found the complete hack in php-
eaccelerator: %((echo %{default_apiver}; php -i 2>/dev/null | sed -n 's/^PHP 
API 
=> //p') | tail -1) - it is applied very similar as suggested.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 194479] Review Request: php-idn

2006-06-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-idn


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194479





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-17 02:02 EST ---
MUST:
=
* rpmlint output is clean
* Package and spec file named appropriately
* Packaged according to packaging guidelines
* License (GPL) ok, license file included
* spec file is legible and in Am. English.
* Source matches upstream
* Compiles and builds on FC5-i386
* BR: ok
* No locales
* No shared libraries (its a plugin)
* Not relocatable
* Package owns / or requires all dirs
* No duplicate files & Permissions ok
* %clean & macro usage OK
* Contains code only
* %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package
* no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files.
* no gui -> no .desktop file required


MUST fix:
=
The use of php-config before the php-devel BR is resolved, see above.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 194479] Review Request: php-idn

2006-06-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-idn


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194479





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-17 01:50 EST ---
Ok,

I've found the following "hack" for this, add at the top of your specfile:
# Useful defaults when building in chroots on systems where PHP is unavailable
# during the get BR step of the build
%define default_apiver  20041225
%define php_apiver %((echo %{default_apiver}; php -i 2>/dev/null | sed -n 's/^P

And then change the Requires line to:
Requires:   php-api = %{php_apiver}

The same should be done for php-magickwand btw.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 194479] Review Request: php-idn

2006-06-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-idn


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194479


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|163776  |163778
  nThis||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-17 01:46 EST ---
On my current testing system I get this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpmbuild -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/php-idn.spec 
sh: php-config: command not found
awk: cmd. line:1: fatal: cannot open file `/main/php.h' for reading (No such
file or directory)
error: line 12: Version required: Requires: php-api =

This is because php-devel isn't installed yet, its BuildRequired, but rpmbuild
first fully parses the spec before checking BR, so this fails. Some discussion
on the mailinglist about a similar problem with python on FC-4 has lead me to
believe that the same will happen on the buildsys when building under mock.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 194479] Review Request: php-idn

2006-06-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-idn


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194479





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-14 07:51 EST ---
When I updated bug #194470 to announce the fixed php-magickwand package, I also 
updated php-idn to match with all common things - unfortunately this was during 
the unrecoverable time of Bugzilla...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 194479] Review Request: php-idn

2006-06-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-idn


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194479


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO||177841
  nThis||




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review