[Bug 194810] Review Request: Openbox

2006-06-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Openbox


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194810


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 194810] Review Request: Openbox

2006-06-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Openbox


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194810


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-12 19:55 EST ---
I don't know if this suggestion belongs in a package-review, but it'd be great
if you could include an openbox.desktop file to be installed in
/usr/share/xsessions (just like the fluxbox package does) so openbox can be
selected from the Sessions list in GDM, instead of having to edit who knows
what file by hand.

By the way, I'm glad you're going to unorphan this package. I love Openbox :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 194810] Review Request: Openbox

2006-06-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Openbox


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194810





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-12 22:12 EST ---
id also say a gdm entry is necassery.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 194810] Review Request: Openbox

2006-06-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Openbox


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194810





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-12 23:31 EST ---
Thanks. Added it in 3.3-0.rc2.2, as suggested.

Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/openbox.spec
SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/openbox-3.3-0.rc2.2.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 194810] Review Request: Openbox

2006-06-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Openbox


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194810





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-13 00:53 EST ---
Hi,

I could be wrong but as far as I understand the NamingGuidelines, this package
should have a Release tag similar to 0.2.rc2 instead of 0.rc2.2.

The relevant part from the NamingGuidelines:

Release Tag for Pre-Release Packages:
   0.%{X}.%{alphatag}
Where %{X} is the release number increment, and %{alphatag} is the string that
came from the version.

Please correct me if I'm mistaken.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 194810] Review Request: Openbox

2006-06-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Openbox


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194810


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO||194811
  nThis||




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review