[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-02-26 19:04:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 Rick L Vinyard Jr rviny...@cs.nmsu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Comment #22 from Rick L Vinyard Jr rviny...@cs.nmsu.edu 2009-02-24 17:17:34 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: clips New Branches: EL-5 Owners: rviny...@cs.nmsu.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 00:56 EST --- This package ships an autoheader generated header (/usr/include/clips/config.h). This is an abuse of the autotools and will render this package unusable for any package using autoconf-based configurations. IMO, this package should not have been approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779
nThis||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-23 16:23 EST ---
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently
+ dist tag is present
+ build root is correct
+ license field matches the actual license
+ license is open source-compatible
+ source files match upstream:
ccba9d912375e57a1b7d9eba12da4198 clipssrc.tar.Z
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ package builds in mock (i386).
+ rpmlint:
W: clips no-documentation
W: clips-devel no-dependency-on clips
W: clips-devel no-documentation
W: clips-xclips no-documentation
these can be ignored.
+ shared libraries in clips-libs, ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ link libraries and include files in clips-devel
+ package is not relocatable.
+ owns the directories it creates
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ docs are large, therefore -doc subpackage.
+ xclips is a GUI app, icon and .desktop file are included
this must be fixed:
? pkg-config clips-6 --libs results in:
/usr/lib -L -lm -lclips
replace Libs: -lm -L ${libdir} -lclips
with Libs: -lm -L${libdir} -lclips (without the space)
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-22 02:32 EST --- Documentation subpackages should be named -doc, not -docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-22 22:14 EST --- Here's the latest version. Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/clips.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/clips-6.24-7.src.rpm Changes: - Renamed docs subpackage to doc - Changed pkgconfig .pc to use -L libdir -lclips in patch - Added extern C and ifdef __cplusplus to clips.h in patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-22 00:54 EST --- Yup. docs subpackage is much cleaner. Thanks for the help on the emacs stuff. Here's the new files: Spec URL: http://miskatonic.dyn-o-saur.com/pub/clips.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.dyn-o-saur.com/pub/fedora/5/srpms/clips-6.24- 6.src.rpm And the changelog: - Created docs subpackage - Moved all pdf docs and examples into docs subpackage - Removed Requires clips from xclips - Added emacs mode to clips package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-19 06:00 EST ---
I think, clips-libs should contain only the necessary files, i.e.,
the documentation should probably go to clips-docs (maybe then
ALL docs can go to clips-docs). clips-libs contains
/usr/share/clips/clips.hlp alright, since this is required by
the shared libraries.
BTW the spec file in the src rpm is not exactly the same as the one
you posted, the one contains %{_datadir}/%{name}/clips.hlp, the other
%{_datadir}/%{name}. The latter is the correct one, of course.
clips-xclips does not need to depend on clips anymore.
The emacs files got to %{_datadir}/emacs/site-lisp.
However you must set (defvar inferior-clips-program clips ...
in the inf-clips.el file.
Then you drop a file clips-init.el into %{_datadir}/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d
with the following content:
(autoload 'clips-mode clips-mode Clips editing mode. t)
(autoload 'run-clips inf-clips Run Clips. t)
(add-to-list 'auto-mode-alist '(\\.clp$ . clips-mode))
Add the files to the clips package using %{_datadir}/emacs/site-lisp
in the %files section.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-18 04:43 EST --- A few things: * /usr/share/applications/fedora-xclips.desktop and /usr/share/pixmaps/clips.png belong to clips-x11 * again, /usr/share/clips-6.24/clips.hlp doesn't need the version, furthermore /usr/share/clips must be owned by the package and some suggestions: * you might consider creating a package clips-libs that only contains the shared libraries in /usr/lib. clips-devel must then require clips-libs and clips-x11 must require clips, all other dependencies are automatic * maybe rename clips-x11 to clips-xclips -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-18 18:05 EST ---
I'd been thinking about splitting off a libs package anyway (since that was
what
actually motivated me to package CLIPS).
Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/clips.spec
SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/clips-6.24-5.src.rpm
Changes:
- Created libs subpackage
- Renamed x11 subpackage to xclips
- Changed install location of clips.hlp in autotools patch
- Renamed clips.png to xclips.png
- Moved xclips.desktop and xclips.png to xclips subpackage
- Modified autotools patch to build xclips.desktop to keep version tag current
- Changed xclips Requires from %%{name} to clips to be more explicit
As for the Emacs mode, I wasn't sure exactly how to handle it. I'm guessing
that
the two .el files get dropped into /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/, but what about
the emacs-clips file?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-17 15:30 EST --- Looks like there's a new 6.24 release of CLIPS. Here's a new spec and srpm for the new release that incorporates Gérard's feedback and adds the XCLIPS color utility built as xclips-color. Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/clips.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/clips-6.24-1.src.rpm Here's the changes: - New release 6.24 - Changed desktop entry name from xclips to XCLIPS - New autotools struture builds clips and xclips in separate directories - Moved bpg.pdf to clips main package - Added examples from AllExamples.tar.Z - Moved clips.hlp to clips main package - Remove xclips.desktop source and moved it into autotools patch - Added build for xclips color utility as xclips-color - Devel headers now install /usr/include/clips - Autotools patch adds defines to find clips.hlp properly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-17 16:11 EST ---
A few issues
* you can now change
Cflags: -I${includedir}/clips-6.24
to
Cflags: -I${includedir}
* (help) does not yet work. It seems that it tries to open
/usr/share/doc/clips-6.24 instead of /usr/share/doc/clips-6.24/clisp.hlp
* I know it is annoying, but clisp.hlp must go to /usr/share/clisp/clisp.hlp,
since it is part of the correct functioning of the program. Remember that
a package can be installed without the docs.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-17 17:48 EST ---
* you can now change
Cflags: -I${includedir}/clips-6.24
to
Cflags: -I${includedir}
Ahh... missed that one.
As for the help file, I was testing directory expansion in autoconf and missed
putting clips.hlp on the end of the string. I put handling of the location of
clips.hlp into configure.in, and used the clips standard file usrsetup.h to
define the autoconf location. That way autoconf can move the help file around
and still handle it in a way that the clips source likes.
These files have a proper pkgconfig entry as well as the fixed help file define.
Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/clips.spec
SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/clips-6.24-2.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-17 19:45 EST --- Missed this part too. Remember that a package can be installed without the docs This one has a little more proper patch that includes the clips.hlp file as well as treating the clips.hlp file as data rather than docs. Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/clips.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/clips-6.24-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-16 03:27 EST --- Ok, builds fine now. * rpmlint is silent on clips, clips-devel and clips-x11 however on clips-debuginfo: E: clips-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/clips-6.23/clipssrc/prntutil.c etc... simply chmod 0644 the sources files (in the %prep section for example) * I used to bundle http://www.ghg.net/clips/download/executables/examples/AllExamples.tar.Z with the package. I think this would be helpful. * xclips should have a .desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-16 03:31 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) * xclips should have a .desktop file Ok, sorry, I didn't see it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-16 03:34 EST --- * Problem: CLIPS (V6.23 01/31/05) CLIPS (help) Loading help file entries from /usr/share/clips/clips.hlp. Please wait... [TEXTPRO1] Could not open file /usr/share/clips/clips.hlp. CLIPS same with xclips * I would use XCLIPS instead of xclips as the name in the .desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-16 03:41 EST --- * Doesn't bpg.pdf properly belong to the main package? It doesn't contain anything about the C interface, AFAIK. * Is it really necessary to use /usr/include/clips-6.23/clips instead of just /usr/include/clips. I don't see there is much chance of parallel install of different versions of clips-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-15 09:25 EST --- *** Bug 195421 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-15 13:03 EST --- Missing BuildReq: libXt-devel, libXaw-devel, maybe others This is on FC5, on FC6 these may possibly be sucked in xorg-x11-proto-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-15 13:45 EST --- Others includes libXext-devel and libXmu-devel. Built against devel, probably not going to avoid these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-16 00:17 EST --- Thanks for the input... and I'm really glad to hear it built against devel. Added libXt-devel, libXext-devel and libXmu-devel to BuildRequires (libXaw-devel was already in there). Here's the new files: Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/clips.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/clips-6.23-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
