[Bug 199494] Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY)

2007-06-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199494


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |medium
   Priority|normal  |medium
Product|Fedora Core |Fedora




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 199494] Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY)

2006-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199494


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 199494] Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY)

2006-07-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199494


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER   |ASSIGNED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-25 10:47 EST ---
Built on dist-fc6

Thanks for your help!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 199494] Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY)

2006-07-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199494


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER   |ASSIGNED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-20 11:47 EST ---
Just confirming, the new release will have:

Provides:   gnu.getopt = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:  gnu.getopt = 0:1.0.9

and

Provides:   gnu.getopt-javadoc = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:  gnu.getopt-javadoc = 0:1.0.9

So the javadoc part also gets replaced.

Can you confirm if this is what is expected?

Thanks!



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 199494] Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY)

2006-07-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199494





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-20 15:07 EST ---
actually, you can drop the epoch business.  If the epoch is 0, there is no need
to list it (nor define it if you're doing that in the spec)

Adding gnu-getopt to you as the owner.  Please let me know when you've built it
so that I can block gnu.getopt.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 199494] Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY)

2006-07-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnu-getopt (RENAME ONLY)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199494


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|188265  |188268
  nThis||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-19 19:29 EST ---
You'll need to have an

Obsoletes: gnu.getopt
Provides: gnu.getopt

for proper upgrade path.

I'll have to change comps too.

Approved with the above changes.  (not looking too closely at existing spec,
thats for another day...)

Please let me know when you build it so that I can update comps (and close this 
bug)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review