[Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-24 10:43 EST --- Thanks! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-23 03:31 EST --- I can't get this application to compile. When it runs through the configure script, it reports that it needs Hermes-1.3.0 or newer. You'll need to find and submit Hermes-1.3.0 (or newer) and add that (and tolua++-devel) to the BRs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-23 04:00 EST --- ??? I could have sworn I added Hermes to the BuildRequires. But appearantly I forgot that one I'll add it (and tolua++) together with other needed fixes once a full review has been done. To get it for the review just do yum install Hermes-devel, its already in Fe with a capatial H -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++
game library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-23 06:47 EST ---
It'll now build and rpmlint is happy with all of the packages created.
I've made the alterations to the spec file so both tolua++-devel and
Hermes-devel are in the BRs and will get back to you on how it works under mock.
Can you also make the BR alteration changes and upload the new spec file?
One other thing. You have provides: clanlib06 = {version}-{release}. That's
okay, but why is it clanlib06 and not ClanLib06 as the spec file and other
references inside the spec file call it?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-23 09:36 EST --- mock build fails : line 45 autoconf : command cannot be found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++
game library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-23 13:55 EST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
One other thing. You have provides: clanlib06 = {version}-{release}. That's
okay, but why is it clanlib06 and not ClanLib06 as the spec file and other
references inside the spec file call it?
Since it _is_ ClanLib06 it will automaticly provide CLanLib06, the lowercase
provide is there exactly for what it is to provide a lowercase alternative to
people who prefer all lowercase names. The guidelines have recently been updated
saying that its ok to have names containing uppercase when upstream uses
uppercase consistenly, but that a full lowercase provides should be present. The
reasoning behind this was to stop problems like you where having with _H_ermes.
About autoconf, missing BR. Sorry about all these missing BR's if I had a better
internet conenction myself I would try things in mock myself :|
Anyways here is a new version which hopefully will build in mock:
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ClanLib06.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ClanLib06-0.6.5-2.src.rpm
Changes:
* Sun Jul 23 2006 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.6.5-2
- Add missing BRs: tolua++-devel, Hermes-devel and autoconf
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-23 16:39 EST --- I've found a problem when running on i386-devel with default SELinux settings. Here is a new release which fixes this (in combination with a soon to be pushed new Hermes): Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ClanLib06.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ClanLib06-0.6.5-3.src.rpm Changes: * Sun Jul 23 2006 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.6.5-3 - Mark asm files as NOT needing execstack, making us OK with new default SELinux targeted policy settings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-23 17:51 EST --- rpmlint is warning me the src.rpm is mod 0666 instead of 0664 for the spec file One thing I did notice during the build and that is debugging is turned off while building, yet a debuginfo package is available. Surely this should not occur. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||199732 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-21 13:44 EST --- I just submitted clanbomber for review which uses this, might be handy for testing, see bug 199732 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-20 17:02 EST --- The other CLanLib review is under bug 199630 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-20 19:02 EST --- Blocker : needs BR lua Possible fault. You haved defined ARCH_CONFIG_FLAGS in the %ifarch construct and passed to the configure line. On a non x86 machine, ARCH_CONFIG_FLAGS is undefined which may upset things somewhat! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199632] Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ClanLib06 - Version 0.6 of this Cross platform C++ game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-21 01:34 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) Blocker : needs BR lua Actually that would be tolua++-devel, but indeed I forgot that one I'll addit together with other needed fixes once a full review has been done. Possible fault. You haved defined ARCH_CONFIG_FLAGS in the %ifarch construct and passed to the configure line. On a non x86 machine, ARCH_CONFIG_FLAGS is undefined which may upset things somewhat! Being non-defined bash will expand it to an empty string, which is just waht we want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
