[Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-19 02:14 EST --- ping again? If I still get no response within one week I'm closing this as a dead review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-25 03:58 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-02 01:11 EST --- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR, as submitter was sponsored in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778, 177841 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-11 00:52 EST --- MUST: = O rpmlint output is: W: palantir hardcoded-packager-tag Tim W: palantir redundant-prefix-tag W: palantir setup-not-quiet W: palantir mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs These all must be fixed * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok, license file included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * "Compiles" and builds on FC-5 i386 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * no .desktop file required MUST fix * rpmlint output: W: palantir hardcoded-packager-tag Tim Remove the packager tag W: palantir redundant-prefix-tag Remove the prefix tag W: palantir setup-not-quiet Add -q to %setup W: palantir mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Only uses spaces for indenting, not tabs * Add: "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" to the subpackages %files . * Source0 must be a full URL Questions: == * I assume the java client doesn't build with gcj? Have you tried? * Why is the building of the QT client optional and not done by default, since it is in a subpackage the user can always choose to not install it so I would prefer to always build it and atleast build it by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-07 20:03 EST --- New package online at http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/palantir-2.6-2.src.rpm (spec at original URL). All rpmlint warnings have been fixed, scripts have been updated according to hints given (in the other review requests). The mentioned problem has been fixed with an extended Makefile patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-26 11:00 EST --- Doesn't build for me as normal user, because it tries to chown installed files: if [ ! -d /var/tmp/palantir-root/usr/share/palantir ] ; then \ mkdir -p /var/tmp/palantir-root/usr/share/palantir ; \ chown root /var/tmp/palantir-root/usr/share/palantir ; \ fi chown: changing ownership of `/var/tmp/palantir-root/usr/share/palantir': Operation not permitted I guess this can be circumvented for the dir case by first doing an mkdir -p. Please post a new version with this fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-25 04:24 EST --- Please try again. It's there now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-24 23:53 EST --- Not able to download SRPM ERROR 404: Not Found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-24 07:20 EST --- SRPM URL is http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/palantir-2.6-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
