[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-27 16:39:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 Rick L Vinyard Jr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2009-03-26 15:35:13 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: clipsmm New Branches: EL-5 Owners: rvinyard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-18 15:40 EST --- ok. That one matches up on md5sum and I don't see any further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. (Note that cvs is down currently however). Also consider doing a review of another waiting package to help spread out the reviewing load. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-13 22:05 EST --- Sorry about that. You're right. The one I uploaded turned out to be from an earlier test just before I pushed the release on SF. I used spectool to pull down the tarball from SF just after the release, but failed to copy to SOURCES before rebuilding. Anyway, there is a new SRPM at the same location built from the SF tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-12 21:38 EST --- Odd. The md5sum still doesn't match... could be something in the way you make your src.rpm? Or some problem with sourceforge? 9ec1cf1e393c2a8637a13a3e4bec55b7 clipsmm-0.0.7.tar.bz2 462cad31023799926ab67f78b628e719 clipsmm-0.0.7.tar.bz2.1 The size is different as well: -rw-r--r-- 1 kevin mock 446966 Nov 12 19:25 clipsmm-0.0.7.tar.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 kevin mock 446707 Nov 12 11:55 clipsmm-0.0.7.tar.bz2.1 It looks like the version in your src.rpm was generated at 11:17am today, and the one on sourceforge was generated 11:55am? drwxr-xr-x 8 kevin mock 1024 Nov 12 11:55 clipsmm-0.0.7-from-sourceforge drwxr-xr-x 8 kevin mock 1024 Nov 12 11:17 clipsmm-0.0.7-from-src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-12 14:29 EST --- Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/clipsmm.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/clipsmm-0.0.7-1.src.rpm I still haven't finished the new 0.1.0 release (probably December or so for it), so I went ahead and made an 0.0.7 release that cleans up some stuff... mainly the smart pointers. As for the spec, no changes except the new release updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-11 20:44 EST --- Ping Rick. Any news on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-09 12:30 EST --- Yeah, it would be good to make sure the md5sums match up. On the Target comment, that shouldn't need to be there for fedora-extras, should it? You should be able to see what branch you checked the spec out on, and determine version at that point? It's a pretty minor issue either way however. Let me know when the 0.0.7 release is out so I can check md5sums... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-08 14:12 EST --- Yes. Sorry for the slow reply, but things have been hectic and I was hoping to have some time to finish up an 0.0.7 release this weekend or next. There won't be anything that really modifies the spec file though... just API changes. When I release 0.0.7, I'll double check the md5sums. As for the '# Target: fedora-5' line, the only reason I'd like to keep it in there is that I have autotools make the specs automatically and with multiple specs for Fedora 4, 5, 6 (and soon to be 7) as well as SuSE 10.0 and 10.1 it makes it easier to see which spec is which if the files are outside the directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-08 00:22 EST --- Ping Rick. Do you still want to submit this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Alias: clipsmm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 16:37 EST ---
OK - Package name
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
See below - Sources match upstream md5sum:
fb0b3f0466641e560dd1605afea248fd clipsmm-0.0.6.tar.bz2
463fec8779f8647a0dd9bf4ea7e95769 clipsmm-0.0.6.tar.bz2.1
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage.
OK - .so files in -devel subpackage.
OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
OK - .la files are removed.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - No rpmlint output.
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it.
OK - Should build in mock.
Issues:
1. Upstream sources don't match? Can you doublecheck that?
I used:
http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/clipsmm/clipsmm-0.0.6.tar.bz2
to get the source.
2. You have a
# Target: fedora-5
at the top of the spec? Can that be removed?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 16:23 EST --- I would be happy to review this package. Look for a full review in a bit here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-06 18:21 EST --- Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/clipsmm.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/clipsmm-0.0.6-1.src.rpm * Sun Aug 6 2006 Rick L Vinyard Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 0.0.6-1 - New release - Added m4 to BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-02 00:42 EST --- Mock build was successfull for rawhide i386 rpmlint is silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-02 00:18 EST --- Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/clipsmm.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/clipsmm-0.0.5-1.src.rpm This one's a lot cleaner, mainly because the srpm wasn't the one I intended (it wasn't built from the spec I posted, which had the right BR). The issue with the autoconf-generated config.h is also fixed in both clips and clipsmm, and neither one has #defines that will step on each other or any other autoconf package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Alias: clipsmm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 02:36 EST ---
== Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored ==
Mock build for rawhide i386 is failed with
No package 'clips-6' found
is clips-6 is in extras? I found only clips package but not clips-6 in extras
* MUST Items:
- dist tag is present.
- The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- The spec file name matching the base package clipsmm, in the
format clipsmm.spec.
- This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- The spec file for the package is legible.
- The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
- This package includes License file COPYING.
- This source package includes the text of the license in its own file,and
that file, containing the text of the license for the package is included in
%doc.
- The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (275cc041b5c0a28903ccace1d896fc33
clipsmm-0.0.4.tar.bz2)
- This package did not containd any ExcludeArch.
- This package have a correct %clean section.
- This package used macros.
- Document files are included.
- Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives.
Also,
* Source URL is present and working.
* BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* I did not test package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 00:39 EST --- NEEDSWORK: - Bogus BR. "BR: clips-devel" is required instead of "BR: clips-libs", otherwise the pkgconfig fails. - Building trips over a severe bug in clips: ... g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../. -I/usr/include/clips -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT factory.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/factory.Tpo -c factory.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/factory.o In file included from ../clipsmm/object.h:25, from ../clipsmm/environmentobject.h:23, from template.h:25, from template.cpp:24: ../clipsmm/config.h:35:1: warning: "PACKAGE" redefined In file included from /usr/include/clips/usrsetup.h:31, from /usr/include/clips/setup.h:446, from /usr/include/clips/clips.h:31, from template.cpp:21: /usr/include/clips/config.h:38:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition This is a critical bug in clips. It bogusly exports an autoheader generated file, which conflicts with clipsmm's config.h. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||clipsmm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 00:11 EST --- SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/clipsmm-0.0.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
