[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO||201449 nThis|| Flag|fedora-review? | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-08 23:54 EST --- Fernando: I am going to go ahead and close this now. If you decide you want to continue this submission, please feel free to re-open this request or file a new one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis|| Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-01 23:28 EST --- Any word on this package review? Anthony: Under the new procedure, the fedora-review flag should be ? if you are in the process of reviewing the package. I will go ahead and set it now. Fernando: Do you still wish to submit this package? If I don't hear back from you in a week I will go ahead and close this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-17 16:49 EST --- Hi nando... it's been a few months now. Were you going to send an updated package? We were close to wrapping this up... AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler
(&Jack client)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-10 00:53 EST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > I think there are only a couple of minor issues. See the lines that start
> > with
> > 'X'. This assumes the tweaks in my uploaded spec file are accepted.
> >
> > X BuildRequires are almost proper.
> > - Look at the changes I made in the spec file I attached in Comment #14
> > to
> > handle FC releases > 5.
>
> Should this be "%{fedora}" >= 4 or just ommit it? I think current Fedora
> Extras
> for 4 and 5 has wxGTK as the name of the package with the proper
> obsoletes/provides for wxGTK2, right?
Yes, I think that's right.
> Is this the version being used by your
> build system?
Yes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler
(&Jack client)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-09 15:55 EST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> I think there are only a couple of minor issues. See the lines that start
> with
> 'X'. This assumes the tweaks in my uploaded spec file are accepted.
>
> X BuildRequires are almost proper.
> - Look at the changes I made in the spec file I attached in Comment #14 to
> handle FC releases > 5.
Should this be "%{fedora}" >= 4 or just ommit it? I think current Fedora Extras
for 4 and 5 has wxGTK as the name of the package with the proper
obsoletes/provides for wxGTK2, right? Is this the version being used by your
build system?
> * rpmlint says:
> W: sooperlooper mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs
> I just use the emacs untabify command to clean these things up.
Fixed now in my copy, thanks.
> X Should Require hicolor-icon-theme since it places an icon in a directory
> owned
> by that package. This is something I just learned about myself, and plan on
> cleaning up my old packages.
First time I hear about this. Makes sense as this is not something that could be
done automatically by rpm, right? Lots of packages will need this...
> X .desktop file is installed properly, but should refer to "SooperLooper", not
> "Sooperlooper".
Fixed, thanks again.
I'll wait to hear from you on the wxGTK/wxGTK2 name before releasing another
spec/srpm.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |rd.edu) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||rd.edu) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler
(&Jack client)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-08 22:03 EST ---
I think there are only a couple of minor issues. See the lines that start with
'X'. This assumes the tweaks in my uploaded spec file are accepted.
* package meets packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* License text included in package.
* source files match upstream. md5sum...
9b34c7cb8fc6daa4c7a9c17004680dac sooperlooper-1.0.8c.tar.gz
* latest version is being packaged.
X BuildRequires are almost proper.
- Look at the changes I made in the spec file I attached in Comment #14 to
handle FC releases > 5.
* package builds in mock.
* rpmlint says:
W: sooperlooper mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs
I just use the emacs untabify command to clean these things up.
* final provides and requires are sane:
sooperlooper-1.0.8-0.2.c.fc6.i386.rpm
sooperlooper = 1.0.8-0.2.c.fc6
=
libasound.so.2
libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9)
libjack.so.0
liblo.so.0
libncurses.so.5
libsamplerate.so.0
libsamplerate.so.0(libsamplerate.so.0.0)
libsigc-1.2.so.5
libsndfile.so.1
libsndfile.so.1(libsndfile.so.1.0)
libstdc++.so.6
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)
libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0
libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)
libwx_baseu_net-2.6.so.0
libwx_baseu_xml-2.6.so.0
libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6.so.0
libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)
libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0
libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)
libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6.2)
libwx_gtk2u_html-2.6.so.0
libwx_gtk2u_html-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)
libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.6.so.0
libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0
libxml2.so.2
libz.so.1
* shared libraries not present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
X Should Require hicolor-icon-theme since it places an icon in a directory owned
by that package. This is something I just learned about myself, and plan on
cleaning up my old packages.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is not present
* scriptlets OK.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
X .desktop file is installed properly, but should refer to "SooperLooper", not
"Sooperlooper".
* not a web app.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-08 21:28 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) > 2. The gui comes up and starts the engine, however, very soon afterwards it > reports a Lost Connection: "Lost connection to SooperLooper engine. See the > Preferences->Connections tab to start a new one". Has anybody seen this > before? This was a DNS problem on my system. Ignore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-08 21:14 EST --- Created an attachment (id=135893) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135893&action=view) Updated spec file The attached spec file builds cleanly in mock on rawhide. A few other problems/questions 1. glibc reports a bug in liblo when you run it. I have a patch for liblo and will respin a new one for Fedora Extras shortly. 2. The gui comes up and starts the engine, however, very soon afterwards it reports a Lost Connection: "Lost connection to SooperLooper engine. See the Preferences->Connections tab to start a new one". Has anybody seen this before? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-04 19:35 EST --- I'm updating the -devel versions of my libraries (dssi, liblo, etc) to Require pkgconfig as per the recent decision. This should also solve the mock build problem here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler
(&Jack client)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-05 00:55 EST ---
i have FC5 system when i give
rpmbuild -ba sooperlooper.spec it worked fine. Created SRPM,RPMS
when i did mock build using FC6 development repository i got following errors in
build.log
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52473
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd sooperlooper-1.0.8c
+ LANG=C
+ export LANG
+ unset DISPLAY
+ find . -type f -exec /usr/bin/perl -p -i -e 's|-fmove-all-movables||g' '{}'
';'
+ ./autogen.sh
--
Checking basic compilation tools ...
You do not have pkg-config correctly installed. You cannot build SooperLooper
without this tool.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52473 (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52473 (%build)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-04 13:11 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) > I did mock build for development version for FC6. Does this happen on fc5? > There i get that error but > when i check my build system strange i found pkg-config is installed/pulled > already and installed under > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/root/usr/bin/pkg-config > > I am really confused on this. Could you please post the error log from the build? I don't get that error so I can't know where it is happening and what is the surrounding context. It could be that the name of the pkgconfig script of one of the dependencies has changed in > fc5 and that's why an error is being reported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-03 23:42 EST --- I did mock build for development version for FC6. There i get that error but when i check my build system strange i found pkg-config is installed/pulled already and installed under /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/root/usr/bin/pkg-config I am really confused on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-03 13:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Still errors in this package > > Checking basic compilation tools ... > > You do not have pkg-config correctly installed. You cannot build SooperLooper > without this tool. You are corrrect but pkgconfig is being pulled in by other dependencies. See below for more details. > Try adding pkgconfig in BuildRequires This is not happening in my build system (mach based). In my case pkgconfig is being pulled in by either: jack-audio-connection-kit-devel libsigc++-devel libsndfile-devel libsamplerate-devel alsa-lib-devel (I tested this by installing the build dependencies one by one manually in my build system and checking on whether pkgconfig was installed as well) Looks like liblo-devel is _not_ pulling in pkgconfig but has a .pc file: /usr/lib/pkgconfig/liblo.pc (version liblo-devel-0.23-6.fc5) Also appears to be the case for libxml2-devel (libxml2-devel-2.6.23-1.2) What I don't understand is why, in your case, pkgconfig is not being pulled in by the _other_ build requirements? It is happening in my build system. Exactly what build system are you using and how is it configured? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-03 03:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Still errors in this package > > Checking basic compilation tools ... > > You do not have pkg-config correctly installed. You cannot build SooperLooper > without this tool. > > Try adding pkgconfig in BuildRequires If that fixes the build, then it probably points to a bug in one of the devel packages required to build this one. Any devel package containing a pkgconfig data file (.pc file) should itself Require: pkgconfig, so anything building using that devel package shouldn't need a buildreq of pkgconfig itself. The packaging committee recently voted to add this to the packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/IRCLog20060706 So if you find any devel package pulled in as a buildreq by this package (look in the root.log from a mock build for a list of packages) that has a .pc file but no dependency on pkgconfig, I suggest you raise a bug on that package and add that bug to the "Bug 200941 depends on" field below. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-03 01:23 EST --- Still errors in this package Checking basic compilation tools ... You do not have pkg-config correctly installed. You cannot build SooperLooper without this tool. Try adding pkgconfig in BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-02 14:25 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == > X This package dont have any License file. Added COPYING file to %doc > * I did not test package functionality > > However i have question, when i saw build.log i found configure was called > nearly 5 times. What kind of this configuration script? Fixed by calling autogen.sh (and including the proper build requirements) New spec and source rpm available at: Spec URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/sooperlooper.spec SRPM URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/sooperlooper-1.0.8-0.2.c.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler
(&Jack client)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-02 13:42 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> > However i have question, when i saw build.log i found configure was called
> > nearly 5 times. What kind of this configuration script?
>
> Yes, I see that in my logs, I don't know what is triggering this. In my case
> the
> build finishes successfully even with the warnings and repeated configure
> calls.
> And the software works. Weird.
>
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > I think you should add NEWS,AUTHORS,Changelog files to your source code
> > thru'
> > adding patch. then changes in %build
> > %build
> > # remove compiler option unrecognized by gcc4x
> > find . -type f -exec %{__perl} -p -i -e "s|-fmove-all-movables||g" {} \;
> > aclocal
> > autoheader
> > automake
> > autoconf
> > %configure
> > %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags}
>
> Hmmm, if I do this to try to fix things then a make does trigger the error
> that
> Anthony sees. Of course if I run aclocal/automake as suggested the error
> happens
> again. Buggy auto* scripts?
I had not realized that autogen.sh was there (that is what should be used in
these cases, I think). Running it managed to bring everything up to date with
the newer autotools versions and pointed to a missing build requirement
(gettext-devel).
After adding that I'm getting a complete build with no configure repeats or
other warnings. I'll actually test the resulting packages and will post newer
.spec and srpms when done.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler
(&Jack client)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-02 13:25 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I tried building this on FC5 and got...
>
> Making all in src
> make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c/src'
> cd .. && /bin/sh /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c/missing --run
> automake-1.9 --foreign src/Makefile
> configure.ac:27: version mismatch. This is Automake 1.9.6,
> configure.ac:27: but the definition used by this AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
> configure.ac:27: comes from Automake 1.9.4. You should recreate
> configure.ac:27: aclocal.m4 with aclocal and run automake again.
> make[2]: *** [Makefile.in] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c/src'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.96186 (%build)
>
> Do you not see this?
Not on my build system, but see below...
(In reply to comment #2)
> However i have question, when i saw build.log i found configure was called
> nearly 5 times. What kind of this configuration script?
Yes, I see that in my logs, I don't know what is triggering this. In my case the
build finishes successfully even with the warnings and repeated configure calls.
And the software works. Weird.
(In reply to comment #3)
> I think you should add NEWS,AUTHORS,Changelog files to your source code thru'
> adding patch. then changes in %build
> %build
> # remove compiler option unrecognized by gcc4x
> find . -type f -exec %{__perl} -p -i -e "s|-fmove-all-movables||g" {} \;
> aclocal
> autoheader
> automake
> autoconf
> %configure
> %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags}
Hmmm, if I do this to try to fix things then a make does trigger the error that
Anthony sees. Of course if I run aclocal/automake as suggested the error happens
again. Buggy auto* scripts?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler
(&Jack client)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-02 02:13 EST ---
I think you should add NEWS,AUTHORS,Changelog files to your source code thru'
adding patch. then changes in %build
%build
# remove compiler option unrecognized by gcc4x
find . -type f -exec %{__perl} -p -i -e "s|-fmove-all-movables||g" {} \;
aclocal
autoheader
automake
autoconf
%configure
%{__make} %{?_smp_mflags}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler
(&Jack client)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-02 01:48 EST ---
== Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored ==
Mock build for rawhide i386 is successfull with errors.
Maybe you try adding autoconf in BR
* MUST Items:
- dist tag is present.
- rpmlint is silent
- The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- The spec file name matching the base package sooperlooper, in the
format sooperlooper.spec.
- This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- The spec file for the package is legible.
- The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
X This package dont have any License file.
- The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (9b34c7cb8fc6daa4c7a9c17004680dac
sooperlooper-1.0.8c.tar.gz)
- This package successfully compiled and built into binary rpms for i386
architecture.
- This package did not contain any ExcludeArch.
- This package owns all directories that it creates.
- This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
- This package have a %clean section, which contains %{__rm} -rf
%{buildroot}.
- This package used macros.
- Document files are included.
- Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives.
- Desktop file installed correclty.
Also,
* Source URL is present and working.
* BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* I did not test package functionality
However i have question, when i saw build.log i found configure was called
nearly 5 times. What kind of this configuration script?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-02 01:07 EST --- Hi Fernando -- I tried building this on FC5 and got... Making all in src make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c/src' cd .. && /bin/sh /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c/missing --run automake-1.9 --foreign src/Makefile configure.ac:27: version mismatch. This is Automake 1.9.6, configure.ac:27: but the definition used by this AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE configure.ac:27: comes from Automake 1.9.4. You should recreate configure.ac:27: aclocal.m4 with aclocal and run automake again. make[2]: *** [Makefile.in] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sooperlooper-1.0.8c' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.96186 (%build) Do you not see this? AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
