[Bug 202836] Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202836 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-18 01:54 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > Looks very good (and fun), APPROVED. > Thanks, imported and build, closing. > One small thing, you should add > %doc COPYING Woops, I forgot todo this, I've made the change in CVS now, a new version will be forthcoming shortly since there are some annoyances I wan't to fix (which require diving into the source first) such as -f to start fullscreen not working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202836] Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202836 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-17 15:43 EST --- Looks very good (and fun), APPROVED. One small thing, you should add %doc COPYING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202836] Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202836 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202836] Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202836 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-17 02:55 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > I see upstream's website has title/header "Abuse-SDL", and upstream tarball is > named abuse_sdl. My inclinication would be to stick with abuse_sdl for > package > name, but that's just me. I can live with that too, but as said this really is THE abuse now these days hence my dropping of the -/_ sdl I don't want people to start looking for the main abuse package, cause there won't be one. But as said either way is eventually fine by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202836] Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202836 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-16 19:14 EST --- I see upstream's website has title/header "Abuse-SDL", and upstream tarball is named abuse_sdl. My inclinication would be to stick with abuse_sdl for package name, but that's just me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202836] Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202836 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-16 13:51 EST --- The fRaBs review is bug 202837 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
