[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-02-13 04:37:18 EDT --- Package imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-02-12 23:11:47 EDT --- Thanks, Bryan, for reviewing. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: cabal-install Short Description: Haskell package (hackage) tool Owners: petersen Branches: F-10 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-02-13 01:41:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|b...@serpentine.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||b...@serpentine.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(peter...@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #7 from Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com 2009-02-11 14:08:56 EDT --- I tried building the above SRPM on F10 using the following packages: ghc-6.10.1-8.fc11.i386 ghc-zlib-0.5.0.0-5.fc11.i386 ghc-HTTP-3001.1.5-1.fc11.i386 The build failed per the attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 --- Comment #8 from Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com 2009-02-11 14:09:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331608) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331608) Log of failed build attempt Failed build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||cabal-install Flag|needinfo?(peter...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 20:39:31 EDT --- The .spec file in comment 6 does not use %cabal_build: you trying another older package perhaps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003
Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com 2009-02-12
01:56:07 EDT ---
Here's my review.
# MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package.
srpm is clean, binary rpm reports these:
cabal-install.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/cabal
cabal-install.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/cabal
These are both acceptable.
# MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
OK.
# MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
OK.
# MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
OK.
# MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license [...]
BSD3 == OK.
# MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match [...]
OK.
# MUST: license(s) in %doc.
OK.
# MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK.
# MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK.
# MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream [...]
OK.
# MUST: successfully compile and build [...]
OK.
# MUST: architectures in ExcludeArch.
OK.
# MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [...]
OK.
# MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
OK.
# MUST: shared library ldconfig
NA.
# MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable [...]
NA.
# MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
OK.
# MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
OK.
# MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
OK.
# MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [...]
OK.
# MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
OK.
# MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
OK.
# MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
NA.
# MUST: %doc must not affect runtime
OK.
# MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
NA.
# MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
Exempt.
# MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files [...]
NA.
# MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix [...]
NA.
# MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages [...]
NA.
# MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives [...]
NA.
# MUST: Packages containing GUI applications [...]
NA.
# MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned [...]
NA.
# MUST: %install rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
OK.
# MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
OK.
# SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text [...]
NA.
# SHOULD: description and summary translations
No.
# SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
OK.
# SHOULD: binary rpms on all supported architectures.
Tested x86_64 and i386.
# SHOULD: functions as described
OK.
# SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
OK.
# SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel [...]
NA.
# SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files [...]
NA.
# SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of [...]
This package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||446451 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-02-09 06:58:57 EDT --- ping anyone? :) It would be really good to get this into F11 - it is the rubygems of the Haskell world. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-02-09 08:56:23 EDT --- I rebuilt (updated) ghc-zlib - so that it installs correctly and this should actually build again now on rawhide (oops!): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1115148 As soon as ghc-6.10.1 has been pushed to f10-updates I will build ghc-zlib and ghc-HTTP there too. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install-0.6.0-3.fc10.src.rpm (just fixed the URL field) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bug 471003 depends on bug 470756, which changed state. Bug 470756 Summary: Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-07 00:02:36 EDT --- Dependencies are now in rawhide. Updating package for latest packaging macros. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install-0.6.0-2.fc10.src.rpm (please ignore the disttag - requires ghc in rawhide to build currently) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bug 471003 depends on bug 425882, which changed state. Bug 425882 Summary: Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||com Blocks||425882, 470756 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 05:54:14 EDT --- This requires ghc-zlib and ghc-HTTP which are currently under review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 08:52:13 EDT --- I think the dependencies are backwards. Does this block ghc-zlib or is it the other way around? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|425882, 470756 | Depends on||425882, 470756 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 18:19:18 EDT --- Oops thanks - made this depend on ghc-zlib and ghc-HTTP reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
