[Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 Pavel Shevchuk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Pavel Shevchuk 2009-02-02 16:12:52 EDT --- Spec imported to cvs, packages built in koji. Thanks Lucian and Kevin, i appreciate your help -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 13:35:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 Pavel Shevchuk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Pavel Shevchuk 2009-01-30 15:18:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gsql Short Description: Integrated database development tool for GNOME Owners: stalwart Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 Lucian Langa changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa 2009-01-30 01:43:00 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: faf236290f222df013198cb0e9cb8555 gsql-0.2.1.tar.bz2 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary is OK. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is OK. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is not silent. gsql.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gsql.schemas gsql-plugins.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gsql-plugins.schemas gsql-engine-mysql.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gsql-engine-mysql.schemas -Safe to ingore gsql.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libgsql.so gsql-plugins.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/gsql/plugins/libgsqlplugin_vte.so gsql-plugins.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/gsql/plugins/libgsqlplugin_runner.so gsql-plugins.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/gsql/plugins/libgsqlplugin_exporter.so gsql-engine-mysql.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/gsql/engines/libgsqlengine_mysql.so -Safe to igore as package uses g_load_module to load this so files. OK final provides and requires are sane: gsql-0.2.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm libgsql.so.0()(64bit) gsql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 gsql(x86-64) = 0.2.1-2.fc11 = /bin/sh GConf2 desktop-file-utils gsql-engine-mysql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 libICE.so.6()(64bit) libORBit-2.so.0()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libart_lgpl_2.so.2()(64bit) libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libbonobo-2.so.0()(64bit) libbonobo-activation.so.4()(64bit) libbonoboui-2.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgconf-2.so.4()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglade-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgnome-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomecanvas-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomeui-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomevfs-2.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgsql.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtksourceview-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libnotify.so.1()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpopt.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) gsql-devel-0.2.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm pkgconfig(libgsql) = 0.2.1 gsql-devel = 0.2.1-2.fc11 gsql-devel(x86-64) = 0.2.1-2.fc11 = /usr/bin/pkg-config gsql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 pkgconfig gsql-engine-mysql-0.2.1-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm libgsqlengine_mysql.so.0()(64bit) gsql-engine-mysql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 gsql-engine-mysql(x86-64) = 0.2.1-2.fc11 = /bin/sh gsql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 libc.so.6()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgsql.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlengine_mysql.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libmysqlclient_r.so.16()(64bit) gsql-plugins-0.2.1-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm libgsqlplugin_exporter.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlplugin_runner.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlplugin_vte.so.0()(64bit) gsql-plugins = 0.2.1-2.fc11 gsql-plugins(x86-64) = 0.2.1-2.fc11 = /bin/sh gsql = 0.2.1-2.fc11 libc.so.6()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglade-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgsql.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlplugin_exporter.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlplugin_runner.so.0()(64bit) libgsqlplugin_vte.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libvte.so.9()(64bit) OK %check is not present;
[Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Shevchuk 2009-01-29 16:53:50 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, i'm having exams this week. * Thu Jan 29 2009 Pavel "Stalwart" Shevchuk - 0.2.1-2 - Added workaround for direct shlib dependency - Removed unneeded ldconfig call from plugins and engine-mysql - Added missing pkgconfig to devel requires New SPEC: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/gsql/gsql.spec New SRPM: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/gsql/10/x86_64/result/gsql-0.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Built RPMs for F10: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/gsql/10/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa 2009-01-25 11:40:00 EDT --- rpmlint is not silent: gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libxml2.so.2 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libdbus-glib-1.so.2 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libatk-1.0.so.0 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libgio-2.0.so.0 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libcairo.so.2 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libfreetype.so.6 gsql.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsql.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libfontconfig.so.1 Please see : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). It is not really necessary to call ldconfig on -plugin and -engine-mysql because no libraries are added on ldconfig search path. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 Lucian Langa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||co...@gnome.eu.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|co...@gnome.eu.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Shevchuk 2008-12-23 17:14:55 EDT --- RPMs built for Fedora 9 and 10, i386 and x86_64, with yum repodata: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/gsql/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review