[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985


Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985





--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net  2009-01-29 
16:39:42 EDT ---
Also the following entries in the FAQ should apply:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985


Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Clone Of|481476  |
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rooz...@gmail.com
   Flag||fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net  2009-01-29 
16:37:48 EDT ---
Packaging is sane and upgrade path works

⬔⬔⬔ APPROVED ⬔⬔⬔

However:

— Please consider adding some explanation in the alt subpackage description on
the difference between alt and normal (it's in the package FAQ)

— Please consider adding fontconfig rules that make each font family substiture
for the other and for the gentium basic variants

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985


Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #3 from Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com  2009-01-29 20:59:58 
EDT ---
Thanks a lot Nicolas.

OK, I hope I am doing this all right:
* I removed the Provides and added more description for GentiumAlt. I will
import the updated version into CVS.
* fontconfig settings need to wait a bit, so I can make sure I learn the syntax
properly. Next week, I hope.
* Blocking request is here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1262

New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: sil-gentium-fonts
Short Description: SIL Gentium fonts
Owners: roozbeh
Branches: 
InitialCC: fonts-sig kevin

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985


Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com  2009-01-30 01:42:41 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts

2009-01-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985


Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|477335  |477337




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review