[Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment

2009-02-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026





--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System   
2009-02-06 00:24:55 EDT ---
hatools-2.00-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment

2009-02-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026


Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment

2009-02-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026





--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System   
2009-02-06 00:19:58 EDT ---
hatools-2.00-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment

2009-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026


Kevin Fenzi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi   2009-02-02 23:09:16 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment

2009-02-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026





--- Comment #5 from Oliver Falk   2009-02-01 15:23:28 
EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: hatools
Short Description: Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment
Owners: oliver
Branches: EPEL-4 EPEL-5 F-9 F-10
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment

2009-02-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026


Oliver Falk  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment

2009-02-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026


Jochen Schmitt  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt   2009-02-01 
14:45:13 EDT ---
Good:
+ License tag say GPLv2+ as an OSS license wich matches with the copyright
notes in the source files.
+ Adding blank lines betweens the paragraphs.


*** APPROVED ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026





--- Comment #3 from Oliver Falk   2009-01-30 08:08:58 
EDT ---
Updated the spec, including TODO and BAD :-)
I did *not* increase the release number.

Thx Jochen for reviewing!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026


Jochen Schmitt  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||joc...@herr-schmitt.de
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|joc...@herr-schmitt.de
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt   2009-01-29 
11:22:55 EDT ---
Good:
+ Basename of the SPEC files matches with package name
+ Package contains the most current release
+ SPEC file is written in English
+ Could download source via spectool -g
+ Packaged tar ball matches with upstream
(md5sum: ba137a37f6725076c7d2c729cbccf4a5)
+ Package contains no patches
+ Package contains a license tag
+ Package contains a verbatin copy of the license text
+ Package contains proper BuildRoot specification
+ Consistently use of rpm macros
+ Package contains no patches
+ Package doesn't need any BRs or Reqs.
+ Package use parallel make
+ Buildroot will be cleaned at the beginning of %clean and %install
+ Local build works fine
+ Build honors $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
+ Koji build works fine
+ Debuginfo package contains source files
+ Local install works fine
+ Start of command without arguments doesn't crashed
+ Local uninstall works fine
+ Package doesn't have subpackages
+ Default files permission are ok.
+ Files have proper file permission
+ %files stanza doesn't have duplicated entries
+ All packaged files are owned by the package
+ No packaged file has a conflict with ohter packages
+ %doc stanza is small, so we don't need a separate subpackage
+ %changelog is in a proper format

Bad:
- License tag says GPL as license. It's necessary to specified the
version of the used GPL. A look on the source files says, that GPLv2+
may the right specification for the license tag.

TODO:
* I thing a blank line beetween the paragraph of the description
will incerease the readability of it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026





--- Comment #1 from Oliver Falk   2009-01-29 07:20:12 
EDT ---
I'm not sure about the GPL license... Maybe with more knowledge about licensing
should take that this review...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review