[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-09 00:03:02 EDT ---

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-04-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-21 21:05:20 EDT ---

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-04-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-04-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-19 15:02:04 EDT ---

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-04-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-19 15:02:10 EDT ---

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-04-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-04-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-04-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #21 from Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2009-04-16 04:58:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) Anithra,

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-04-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #19 from Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2009-04-15 08:47:10 EDT --- Spec URL:

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-04-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #18 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-04-14 15:50:16 EDT --- - compiler flags used correctly - spec file

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-04-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-04-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #17 from Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2009-04-06 08:21:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) What's the

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-04-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-04-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-04-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #15 from Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2009-04-01 11:20:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) It would be

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-03-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #14 from William Cohen wco...@redhat.com 2009-04-01 00:09:26 EDT --- Started playing with the

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-03-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #13 from Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2009-03-17 08:25:40 EDT --- Thanks Will, Updated spec and src

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #12 from William Cohen wco...@redhat.com 2009-03-16 16:37:58 EDT --- Re-read the packaging guidelines and used

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-03-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #11 from Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2009-03-13 10:11:02 EDT --- Updated spec and src rpm: Spec URL:

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-02-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-02-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #9 from William Cohen wco...@redhat.com 2009-02-17 11:59:14 EDT --- The packaging for systemtapguiserver is

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-02-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #10 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-02-17 19:03:03 EDT --- William, if you'll take the

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-02-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-02-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #8 from Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2009-02-10 05:20:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) I don't think

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-02-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #6 from Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2009-02-09 05:48:21 EDT --- Spec URL:

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Armin feng.sh...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-02-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #5 from Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2009-02-05 06:02:27 EDT --- Spec URL:

[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver

2009-02-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483543] Review Request: SystemTapGuiServer

2009-02-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #4 from Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2009-02-04 14:55:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) This RPM will

[Bug 483543] Review Request: SystemTapGuiServer

2009-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 William Cohen wco...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483543] Review Request: SystemTapGuiServer

2009-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #2 from William Cohen wco...@redhat.com 2009-02-03 18:26:59 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330797) --

[Bug 483543] Review Request: SystemTapGuiServer

2009-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #3 from William Cohen wco...@redhat.com 2009-02-03 18:29:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330798) --

[Bug 483543] Review Request: SystemTapGuiServer

2009-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added