[Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView

2009-03-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359


Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE




--- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com  2009-03-10 
11:13:09 EDT ---
This is in Fedora now, so closing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView

2009-02-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359


Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com  2009-02-10 17:31:11 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView

2009-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359


Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||rjo...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rjo...@redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView

2009-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359


Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com  2009-02-09 09:14:55 
EDT ---
Some general comments first ...

 find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';'
can be replaced by:
 find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -delete

The license file issue should be raised upstream.  Just
adding a link to a mailing list message into the spec
file should be sufficient.

More comments follow ...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView

2009-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359





--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com  2009-02-09 09:15:38 
EDT ---
rpmlint output:

gtksourcecompletion-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
gtksourcecompletion-doc.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long The
gtksourcecompletion-doc package contains documentation for gtksourcecompletion.
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.

The no-documentation warning is OK temporarily until
we resolve the license issue.

description-line-too-long should be corrected.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView

2009-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359


Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||needinfo?(michel.syl...@gma
   ||il.com)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView

2009-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359





--- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com  2009-02-09 09:24:40 
EDT ---
- rpmlint output

See comment 2.

+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines

Yes, but the very loose standards of Fedora.  cf. gtksourceview

+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora

Real license is LGPLv2+.  COPYING file needs updating as mentioned
in comment 1.

+ license matches the actual package license
- %doc includes license file

See comment 1.

+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
  b031896ce03bef4ca711f9b1e0a34544 / 431699
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
  x86_64
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1115220
+ %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
+ binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
+ large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
+ header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
+ packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
+ libfoo.so must go in -devel
+ -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8

Optional:

? if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
  see comment 1
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
+ reviewer should build the package in mock
+ the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
- review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
+ pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView

2009-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359


Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(michel.syl...@gma |
   |il.com) |




--- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com  
2009-02-09 10:13:01 EDT ---
To clarify, these are the remaining issues:
- wrong copying file included in tarball: is this a blocker, and could I just
bundle the correct COPYING and COPYING.LIB files from the FSF?

- package naming: should this ideally be gtksourceview2-completion,
GtkSourceCompletion, or something else?

- functionality review: the vtg demo should allow this to be tested:
  http://vtg.googlecode.com/svn/wiki/screencasts/vtg-demo-1.ogg

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView

2009-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359





--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com  2009-02-09 10:22:27 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 To clarify, these are the remaining issues:
 - wrong copying file included in tarball: is this a blocker, and could I just
 bundle the correct COPYING and COPYING.LIB files from the FSF?

This is not a blocker.  Just post about it on an upstream
mailing list, and then add the URL of that posting as a comment
eg in the spec file, just so we know what is happening.

 - package naming: should this ideally be gtksourceview2-completion,
 GtkSourceCompletion, or something else?

Package name is OK according to the guidelines, it's just that
I personally think the guidelines are rather weak.  Again,
this is not a blocker.

 - functionality review: the vtg demo should allow this to be tested:
   http://vtg.googlecode.com/svn/wiki/screencasts/vtg-demo-1.ogg

I can't build vtg yet unfortunately, but I will try this when
it builds.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView

2009-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359





--- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com  
2009-02-09 11:05:16 EDT ---
OK, so once we can resolve the vtg build issue, both reviews should be in good
shape. I'm contacting upstream about the licensing text.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView

2009-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359


Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com  2009-02-09 11:24:27 
EDT ---
Just put that link into the spec file when you check it in.

Package is APPROVED by rjones.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView

2009-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359


Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com  
2009-02-09 12:38:22 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: gtksourcecompletion
Short Description: Completion support for GtkSourceView
Owners: salimma
Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView

2009-02-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359


Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||484360




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review