[Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras

2009-02-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704


Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras

2009-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704





--- Comment #3 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com  2009-02-13 
07:34:54 EDT ---
Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libapogee.spec
SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libapogee-2.2-2.fc10.src.rpm

I have fixed the license and submitted a new bug about library-calling-exit

Regarding ppc ppc64, there was already a bug filled about the problem. The
solutions seems to be as easy as removing sys/io.h includes. 

https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detailaid=2215787group_id=90275atid=593019

So I have created a patch that does exactly that. The package now builds in
koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1124525

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras

2009-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704


Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com  2009-02-13 08:56:23 
EDT ---
Ok, thank you!

- license is OK
- build is OK

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras

2009-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704


Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #5 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com  2009-02-13 
09:15:39 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: libapogee
Short Description: Library for Apogee CCD Cameras
Owners: sergiopr
Branches: F-10 F-9
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras

2009-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704


Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com  2009-02-13 19:40:36 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras

2009-02-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704





--- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com  2009-02-12 04:43:10 
EDT ---
Package Review
==

Key:
 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
 [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
 Tested on: f11 / i386, x86_64
 Build failure on: ppc, ppc64, see summary
 [!] Rpmlint output: not clean
 - libapogee.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libapogeee.so.2.2
e...@glibc_2.2.5
 - libapogee.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libapogeeu.so.2.2
e...@glibc_2.2.5
 [-] Package is not relocatable.
 [x] Buildroot is correct
 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 License type: GPLv2+
 - SPEC file contains GPL+ 
 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [-] The spec file handles locales properly.
 [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 [x] Permissions on files are set properly.
 [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
 [x] Package consistently uses macros.
 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
 [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
 [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
 [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
 [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
 [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in koji.
 - koji dist-f11  
 [!] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
 - package does not build on PPC, PPC64

   Building CXX object CMakeFiles/apogeeu.dir/ApnCamera_Linux.o
   error: 
   sys/io.h: No such file or directory

 [?] Package functions as described.
 [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
 [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
 [-] File based requires are sane.

=== SUMMARY ===
- Ask upstream to fix rpmlint output
- Fix license
- Package should compile and build on PPC, PPC64! 
  * If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, 
then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each
architecture 
listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the
reason that the 
package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number
MUST be placed 
in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. 
  *
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Architecture_Build_Failures

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras

2009-02-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704


Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|478539  |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras

2009-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704


Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||478539




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras

2009-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704


Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||libapogee




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras

2009-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704


Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jrez...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jrez...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com  2009-02-09 11:53:15 
EDT ---
rpmlint output:
libapogee.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libapogeee.so.2.2
e...@glibc_2.2.5
libapogee.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libapogeeu.so.2.2
e...@glibc_2.2.5

Please report upstream bug as for libindi. I'll continue later, I have to leave
now, but from first view it looks OK for me.

License typo - it is GPLv2+ not GPL+

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review