[Bug 546866] Review Request: qffmpeg - Stripped-down fork of ffmpeg for libspice
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546866 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com 2009-12-27 18:10:47 EDT --- Ralf, agreed. It's dependencies seem to build just fine with regular ffmpeg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 546866] Review Request: qffmpeg - Stripped-down fork of ffmpeg for libspice
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546866 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2009-12-12 08:37:34 EDT --- Cf. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 for what I think about such forks. If you want it formally - NEEDSWORK: * Invalid Source0-URL - Package has no upstream. * Consider your application to dlopen ffmpeg * Package conflicts with ffmpeg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
