this weekend to look at it, but I'm not really willing to
be upstream for RPM2 long term.
Should we drop it from F10? I don't know how widely used it is.
--
Robin Norwood
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org
: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 7%{?dist}
Summary: Perl bindings for the RPM Package Manager API
License: GPL or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -50,6 +50,10 @@
%{_mandir}/man3/RPM2.3pm*
%changelog
+* Mon Aug 25 2008 Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.67-7
+- Build
@@ -57,6 +57,10 @@
%changelog
+* Tue Feb 19 2008 Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.13-3
+- Bring in fixes from fedora spec file
+- Build for EPEL-4
+
* Sun Jul 11 2004 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 0:1.13-2
- Bring up to date with current fedora.us Perl spec template.
--
Fedora Extras
Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Dec 6, 2007 8:35 AM, Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rafael Garcia-Suarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's the perlmodcompat stuff, if I may ask?
This is the business that creates the directories:
/usr/lib/perl5/{5.8.6,5.8.7,5.8.8}
So
Marius Feraru [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[My apologies for my digression, feel free to ignore it.]
Robin Norwood wrote:
/usr/lib/perl5/{5.8.6,5.8.7,5.8.8}
So that rpms built for older releases will still work. It's kindof
nasty, but as I understand it, it was to prevent having to rebuilt
already :)
notably Sascha Blank and Andreas König for the Attribute stuff, and
Schwern Craig for MakeMaker.
The Plan would be to release 5.10.0 on the 18th december. Why the
18th? Read perlhist.
---End Message---
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone
Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Along these lines... Do we have a plan for including 5.10 in
F-9/devel? With the RC out, it sounds like 5.10 will GA
not-too-horribly-soon from now, and we're at a point
Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Along these lines... Do we have a plan for including 5.10 in
F-9/devel? With the RC out, it sounds like 5.10 will GA
not-too-horribly-soon from now, and we're at a point in devel where
it's probably the Right
of such a
central module.
%package CPAN
Version:1.76_02
Oh, duh. I didn't realize that the version was hardcoded in the spec
file. I'll fix that today.
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras
Tom \spot\ Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 15:32 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote:
o Speaking of the perlmodcompat stuff - is 5.10.0 a good time to get rid
of it? Or we be kicking ourselves when 5.10.x is released and we need
to rebuild everything?
I think we should
://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing
-Test-Pod-Coverage -- Check for pod coverage in your
distribution
* perl-Text-CSV_XS -- Comma-separated values manipulation routines
I can take these. Is there a good way to mass-convert these modules, or
do we just do individual requests?
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc
Tom \spot\ Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 16:04 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote:
* perl-Compress-Bzip2 -- Interface to Bzip2 compression library
* perl-DBD-CSV -- DBI driver for CSV files
* perl-DBD-SQLite -- Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver
the license field as you go (Not blindly, of
course...there are probably exceptions).
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list
, of course.
There are some security fixes included, which is why I'm even bothering
to roll an FC5 update this late in its lifecycle.
http://search.cpan.org/src/OLAF/Net-DNS-0.60/Changes
Thanks,
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te
Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 15:21 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Release 1.20 ;)
Adam just (Today, 2007-06-05) seems to have officially released 1.20
see: http://search.cpan.org/~adamk/Archive-Zip-1.20/
Ask, and ye shall receive. I'll build
/
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
Jason L Tibbitts III [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RN == Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RN Is there a general policy for this sort of situation, and if not,
RN should there be?
I'm not sure we could make one. When upstream forks (or pseudo-forks
as seems to have happened here), we're
This package contains header files and development modules.
@@ -721,6 +719,9 @@
%{_mandir}/man3/Test::Tutorial*
%changelog
+* Fri Jun 1 2007 Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 4:5.8.8-19
+- Remove artificial Requires from perl-devel
+
* Wed May 16 2007 Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 4:5.8.8-18
Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 14:33 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote:
Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know if it makes sense to include all the core modules as BR's -
It does, because this is the only way to guarantee long term stability.
IMO
Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 11:32 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote:
Hi,
We've been discussing the perl split and how to minimize disruption for
users. Warren, spot, and I are seeing about getting the 'core' perl
packages that have been split into separate RPMs
:
perl-devel
perl-CPAN
perl-ExtUtils-Embed
perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker
perl-Test-Harness
perl-Test-Simple
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl
Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 11:19 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote:
Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. Such issues could easily be approached by a perl-SWAT team, but ...
I find it remarkable that none of you commented on this.
Are you
Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 10:48 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote:
Well, what does collaborative maintainership mean to you, exactly?
A team of equal (senior-, overseer-) maintainers simultaneously working
collaboratively on something.
Not a subordinate coding
it remarkable that none of you commented on this.
Are you volunteering to start one? I'll be happy to help as much as I
can, time permitting. :-)
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http
::MakeMaker) and (less frequent)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More).
2. Such issues could easily be approached by a perl-SWAT team, but ...
3. It's a grandfathering approach. There is no need to rebuild
everything.
^ What he said.
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet
Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 4/16/07, Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:01 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
On 4/16/07, Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, that seems to be the consensus. We'll roll the split into F7, add
the needed packages
. I'll get an email together to fedora devel list
explaining the changes and asking for feedback. We should also update
the perl packaging guidelines wiki page(s). Spot, I think you own those
- do you want to make the change (perl packages should now BR perl-devel
+ co), or shall I?
-RN
--
Robin
' is likely to fail. Would it be wise to add a:
Provides: cpan
To that package?
Thanks,
-RN
Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
It doesn't work.
The epochs on dependencies on perl inside of sub-packages are wrong.
E.g.:
# rpm -q
.
Thanks,
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com
/lib/perl5/%{perl_version}/Test/Simple*
/usr/lib/perl5/%{perl_version}/Test/Tutorial*
%{_mandir}/man3/Test::More*
%{_mandir}/man3/Test::Builder*
%{_mandir}/man3/Test::Simple*
%{_mandir}/man3/Test::Tutorial*
%changelog
* Wed Mar 28 2007 Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 4:5.8.8-16
- Includes patch from
Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 15:33 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the delay, but here's a new perl spec file including Ralf and
Tom's changes, removing the Requires: perl-devel, and a couple of minor
cleanups from me.
It seems to build
Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:20 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote:
[...]
I noticed a further problems:
On FC6 with a locally build perl*-14.1 (including my most recent
patches) in a local repo in addition to the FC's
does 'obsolete' older versions of perl, but rpm can't
really express that.
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing
annoying - I wish there were a 'better way'.
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 11:08 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote:
[...]
If we retroactively add a 'Provides: perl-devel' to versions of perl in
older distributions, will that help?
It will solve the *.spec portability issue, but ... the core question
still
the change, make a decision, and
get this thing done one way or another. We'll end with a better,
stronger, faster perl when we're done.
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http
be. I can see putting MakeMaker and CPAN into perl-devel, but
perlbug really seems to me to belong in the main perl package.
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki
short order, we will look
at just rolling perl-devel back into perl and adding a Provides:
perl-devel. We'll consider the fact that perl isn't split out into
perl-devel as a bug to be fixed in Fedora 8.
Thanks for your patience.
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet
-RPM-Specfile is more appropriate for Extras.
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list
in it, and takes a few minutes for someone to read
through and understand what's going on. But I'll still fix it if you
just reopen #73970. :-)
Thanks,
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http
objections?
If not, Paul, feel free to re-assign the bug to me and the perl package.
Thanks,
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl
for a %post script.
OTOH, I'd rather not break everyone's perl modules.
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora
/bar)
o Put a 'use lib /foo/bar' at the top of all the scripts
Since use lib prepends to @INC, that 'should work'.
Anyone have a better, or at least 'less bad', idea?
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras
.
While I get up to speed, is there anything that you guys think needs
attention sooner rather than later?
Thanks,
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone.
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs
46 matches
Mail list logo
