[Bug 250873] Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5

2007-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250873 Bug 250873 depends on bug 250872, which changed state. Bug 250872

[Bug 250862] Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5

2007-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-BerkeleyDB for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250862 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed

[Bug 250872] Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5

2007-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-FreezeThaw for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250872 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed

[Bug 242065] perl-CGI-Session is not available in FE6

2007-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-CGI-Session is not available in FE6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242065 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed

[Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5

2007-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed

Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?

2007-12-10 Thread Robin Norwood
Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Dec 6, 2007 8:35 AM, Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rafael Garcia-Suarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What's the perlmodcompat stuff, if I may ask? This is the business that creates the directories: /usr/lib/perl5/{5.8.6,5.8.7,5.8.8} So that

rpms/perl-XML-XQL/EL-5 XML-XQL-filter-provides.sh, NONE, 1.1 perl-XML-XQL.spec, 1.4, 1.5

2007-12-10 Thread Steven Pritchard
Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-XML-XQL/EL-5 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23114 Modified Files: perl-XML-XQL.spec Added Files: XML-XQL-filter-provides.sh Log Message: Sync with devel. --- NEW FILE XML-XQL-filter-provides.sh --- #!/bin/sh #

Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?

2007-12-10 Thread Robin Norwood
Marius Feraru [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [My apologies for my digression, feel free to ignore it.] Robin Norwood wrote: /usr/lib/perl5/{5.8.6,5.8.7,5.8.8} So that rpms built for older releases will still work. It's kindof nasty, but as I understand it, it was to prevent having to rebuilt

[Rafael Garcia-Suarez] Ready for release?

2007-12-10 Thread Robin Norwood
5.10.0 before Christmas, looks like. Neat. -RN ---BeginMessage--- With the last patch to Attribute::Handlers and the upgrade to EU::MM 6.42, I hope this is an answer to our problems. I'll kick out an RC3 soon, which hopefully will be final. I'll let the smokes run however. (That will mean no

Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?

2007-12-10 Thread Marius Feraru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robin Norwood wrote: I'm probably missing the point, but I don't really see how this is significantly better than the way we do the perlmodcompat stuff now. Let's detail what these changes mean: a) using ABI based layout (instead version based); b)

[Bug 250876] Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5

2007-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-GSSAPI for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250876 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed

[Bug 250860] Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5

2007-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250860 Bug 250860 depends on bug 250876, which changed state. Bug

[Bug 250860] Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5

2007-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please rebuild perl-Authen-SASL for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250860 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed

Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?

2007-12-10 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 04:26 +0200, Marius Feraru wrote: I guess we will talk about patches in January, when we'll deal with rpm5's perl helper ;-) Last time I looked, Fedora wasn't planning to use that fork. ~spot -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?

2007-12-10 Thread Chris Weyl
On Dec 10, 2007 8:50 AM, Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, for b), we still have: Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) in the perl RPM, and: Ohhh, duh. I was conflating the two. -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

Re: time for perl 5.10.x in devel?

2007-12-10 Thread Marius Feraru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom spot Callaway wrote: Last time I looked, Fedora wasn't planning to use that fork. Right, I remember the discussions; I should have kept the still-ranting mark for that paragraph. Sorry ;-) - -- Marius Feraru -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-