[Bug 228429] mod_perl errantly provides perl(warnings)

2007-04-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: mod_perl errantly provides perl(warnings) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228429 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed

Re: Breaking perl...

2007-04-16 Thread Tom \spot\ Callaway
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 11:37 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote: o We get those packages added to the standard buildroots - since perl is already considered standard, it isn't really a stretch to me for the -devel and related packages to be there too. Yeah. I think this is the best bet. -- Fedora

Re: Breaking perl...

2007-04-16 Thread Paul Howarth
Robin Norwood wrote: So, I was waiting for feedback on the latest iteration of the perl spec file before proceeding, but I haven't really gotten any - I guess people are generally busy with their day jobs, etc. However, we need to make a call here with the perl spec file. The way things are

Re: Breaking perl...

2007-04-16 Thread Tom \spot\ Callaway
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 16:56 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: I was quite happy to add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or whatever's appropriate for a given module for the packages I maintain. I'm still happy to do this. I can understand the desire to put perl-devel in the buildroot given the

Re: Breaking perl...

2007-04-16 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 11:37 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote: So, I was waiting for feedback on the latest iteration of the perl spec file before proceeding, but I haven't really gotten any - I guess people are generally busy with their day jobs, etc. [3 proposals] That's what I've been

Re: Breaking perl...

2007-04-16 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 18:12 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 11:37 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote: So, I was waiting for feedback on the latest iteration of the perl spec file before proceeding, but I haven't really gotten any - I guess people are generally busy with

Re: Breaking perl...

2007-04-16 Thread Robin Norwood
Tom \spot\ Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 16:56 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: I was quite happy to add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or whatever's appropriate for a given module for the packages I maintain. I'm still happy to do this. I can understand the desire

Re: Breaking perl...

2007-04-16 Thread Tom \spot\ Callaway
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:58 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote: Tom \spot\ Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 16:56 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: I was quite happy to add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or whatever's appropriate for a given module for the packages I maintain.

Re: Breaking perl...

2007-04-16 Thread Chris Weyl
On 4/16/07, Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, that seems to be the consensus. We'll roll the split into F7, add the needed packages to the buildroots, and get the perl-* spec files fixed for F8. I'll get an email together to fedora devel list explaining the changes and asking for

Re: Breaking perl...

2007-04-16 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:01 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: On 4/16/07, Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, that seems to be the consensus. We'll roll the split into F7, add the needed packages to the buildroots, and get the perl-* spec files fixed for F8. I'll get an email together to

Re: Breaking perl...

2007-04-16 Thread Chris Weyl
On 4/16/07, Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:01 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: On 4/16/07, Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, that seems to be the consensus. We'll roll the split into F7, add the needed packages to the buildroots, and get the perl-*

[Bug 236631] New: Please build perl-Unix-Syslog for EL4

2007-04-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236631 Summary: Please build perl-Unix-Syslog for EL4 Product: Fedora EPEL Version:

[Bug 236632] New: Please build perl-Unix-Syslog for EL5

2007-04-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236632 Summary: Please build perl-Unix-Syslog for EL5 Product: Fedora EPEL Version:

[Bug 236631] Please build perl-Unix-Syslog for EL4

2007-04-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please build perl-Unix-Syslog for EL4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236631 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed

Re: Breaking perl...

2007-04-16 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:58 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote: Tom \spot\ Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 16:56 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: I was quite happy to add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or whatever's appropriate for a given module for the packages I maintain.