[Bug 198399] Package perl lacks IPv6 support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package perl lacks IPv6 support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198399 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 202310] perl-DBI: update request to version 1.52 (FC-5 and rawhide)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-DBI: update request to version 1.52 (FC-5 and rawhide) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202310 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-25 10:22 EST --- Also in the latest rawhide. (perl-DBI-1.52-1.fc6.i386.rpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 204093] New: perl -i resets file ACLs and EAs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204093 Summary: perl -i resets file ACLs and EAs Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Description of problem: When perl's -i option is used to do an in-place edit of a file, it resets the ACLs and extended attributes on that file. Since perl -i can be a very helpful tool for scripting and system administration, it would be nice if it preserved ACLs and EAs. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.8-5 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. touch testfile 2. setfacl -m u:testuser:r testfile 3. setfattr -n user.test testfile 4. perl -pi -e 's/Something/SomethingElse/' testfile 5. getfacl testfile; getfattr testfile Actual results: Nothing. Expected results: ACLs and EAs set in steps 2 and 3 above. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 204174] New: SpamAssassin with URIDNSBL tries DNS lookups for *.so in body text
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204174 Summary: SpamAssassin with URIDNSBL tries DNS lookups for *.so in body text Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-perl-devel- [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],parkerm @pobox.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Description of problem: SpamAssassin, when using the URIDNSBL plugin (the default) attempts DNS queries on body text containing words such as libplain.so, or anything ending in ".so". The DNS queries fail of course. I noticed this problem as I am subscribed to info-cyrus and postfix-users mailing lists where these libraries are often discussed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): spamassassin-3.1.3-1.fc5 How reproducible: Every time. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Ensure that the SpamAssassin URIDNSBL plugin is loaded in /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre 2. Send a message with ".so" in the body of the message (I tried "marcinator.so") 3. Check your /var/log/messages and see Aug 26 06:51:47 home named[5631]: lame server resolving 'marcinator.so' (in 'so'?): 205.166.226.38#53 Aug 26 06:51:49 home named[5631]: unexpected RCODE (REFUSED) resolving 'marcinator.so/NS/IN': 209.68.0.85#53 Actual results: SpamAssassin looks up *.so from body text Expected results: SpamAssassin would not look up *.so as it causes unnecessary DNS lookups that will fail Additional info: When I comment out the URIDNSBL plugin entry in /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre and try again, the symptoms do not occur. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 204174] SpamAssassin with URIDNSBL tries DNS lookups for *.so in body text
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: SpamAssassin with URIDNSBL tries DNS lookups for *.so in body text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204174 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-26 12:53 EST --- FYI, this was cut/paste into SA's Bugzilla ticket 5066 http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5066 SA is operating correctly, so the ticket was closed as "worksforme". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 204174] SpamAssassin with URIDNSBL tries DNS lookups for *.so in body text
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: SpamAssassin with URIDNSBL tries DNS lookups for *.so in body text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204174 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED Severity|normal |low External Bug||http://issues.apache.org/Spa Reference||mAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=50 ||68 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-26 17:28 EST --- See http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5068 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 191387] RFE: support for perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: support for perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191387 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-30 12:18 EST --- Done for FC6. Sorry for this extra-lenghty reply, but I packaged perl-Unicode-Map only as a dependency. If you're interested in this package, please feel free to take it over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 191350] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191350 Bug 191350 depends on bug 191387, which changed state. Bug 191387 Summary: RFE: support for perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191387 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 204679] New: Update perl unicode tables to unicode 5.0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204679 Summary: Update perl unicode tables to unicode 5.0 Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Description of problem: Fedora people are making noises about Unicode 5 support in FC6 (http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3626796), but the actual unicode tables shipped in the perl package (/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/unicore/) are still at 4.1. Official 5.0 definitions are available at http://www.unicode.org/Public/5.0.0/ucd/ (my package actually only cares about UnicodeData.txt and Blocks.txt) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.8-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 204679] Update perl unicode tables to unicode 5.0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Update perl unicode tables to unicode 5.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204679 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||150223 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 205455] New: RFE: Versioned Obsoletes for built-in perl modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205455 Summary: RFE: Versioned Obsoletes for built-in perl modules Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Description of problem: The perl rpm Obsoletes a number of modules which are now included in base perl 5.8.8. However some of these modules do get updated fairly regularly in between perl releases. As a system builder I prefer to update them by building an RPM with cpanflute for the specific module e.g. perl-Time-HiRes, so that I get simple and repeatable installations. But because of the Obsoletes in the perl RPM I have to remember which are in base perl and choose non-standard module names to get round it. If the Obsoletes tag could be made versioned, against the actual module version included in perl, it would simplify the task of keeping systems up to date between Fedora releases. It would also make it it much easier when Fedora perl is updated because $PACKAGE_MANAGER could be trusted not to remove newer modules. At the time of writing the tags for perl 5.8.8 would be: Obsoletes: perl-Digest-MD5 <= 2.36 Obsoletes: perl-MIME-Base64 <= 3.07 Obsoletes: perl-libnet <= 1.19 Obsoletes: perl-Storable <= 2.15 Obsoletes: perl-CGI <= 3.15 Obsoletes: perl-CPAN <= 1.7602 Obsoletes: perl-DB_File <= 1.814 Obsoletes: perl-Filter <= 1.32 Obsoletes: perl-Filter-Simple <= 0.82 Obsoletes: perl-Time-HiRes <= 1.86 Obsoletes: perl-Test-Builder-Tester <= 1.02 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 5.8.8-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 205562] New: maybe shouldn't provide perl(DB)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205562 Summary: maybe shouldn't provide perl(DB) Product: Fedora Core Version: test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-Crypt-SSLeay AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Description of problem: I found by chance that perl-Crypt-SSLeay provides perl(DB), which is also provided by perl. So, at the first sight, it seems that there is something wrong. I haven't investigated more, so it may be completly right for perl-Crypt-SSLeay to provide perl(DB), if it is the case sorry for the noise Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 205607] New: Errant provide: perl(UNIVERSAL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205607 Summary: Errant provide: perl(UNIVERSAL) Product: Fedora Extras Version: fc5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-UNIVERSAL-exports AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED],fedora-perl-devel- [EMAIL PROTECTED] This package provides perl(UNIVERSAL), which is properly provided by the base perl package. (This bug is valid for devel also, but BZ won't allow multiple version selections.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 205608] New: Errant provide: perl(UNIVERSAL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205608 Summary: Errant provide: perl(UNIVERSAL) Product: Fedora Extras Version: fc5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-UNIVERSAL-moniker AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED],fedora-perl-devel- [EMAIL PROTECTED] This package provides perl(UNIVERSAL), which is properly provided by the base perl package. (This bug is valid for devel also, but BZ won't allow multiple version selections.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 205609] New: Errant provide: perl(UNIVERSAL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205609 Summary: Errant provide: perl(UNIVERSAL) Product: Fedora Extras Version: fc5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-UNIVERSAL-require AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED],fedora-perl-devel- [EMAIL PROTECTED] This package provides perl(UNIVERSAL), which is properly provided by the base perl package. (This bug is valid for devel also, but BZ won't allow multiple version selections.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 205562] maybe shouldn't provide perl(DB)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: maybe shouldn't provide perl(DB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205562 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-07 16:55 EST --- This is caused by the /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Net/SSL.pm file containing the line: package DB; This causes the perl provides finder to think it provides "perl(DB)". It looks like the code is using the Perl debugging API to reach up the stack (a pretty nasty hack). I am not sure why it is doing "package DB" instead of "require DB". The provides should definitely be filtered out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 205607] Errant provide: perl(UNIVERSAL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Errant provide: perl(UNIVERSAL) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205607 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||0.05-2 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 15:04 EST --- Fixed in 0.05-2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 205608] Errant provide: perl(UNIVERSAL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Errant provide: perl(UNIVERSAL) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205608 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||0.08-4 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 15:08 EST --- Fixed in 0.08-4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 205609] Errant provide: perl(UNIVERSAL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Errant provide: perl(UNIVERSAL) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205609 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||0.10-2 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 15:20 EST --- Fixed in 0.10-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 202310] perl-DBI: update request to version 1.52 (FC-5 and rawhide)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-DBI: update request to version 1.52 (FC-5 and rawhide) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202310 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-15 16:53 EST --- perl-DBI-1.52-1.fc5 has been pushed for fc5, which should resolve this issue. If these problems are still present in this version, then please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 175439] [FC4 Regression]: spamc doesn't use localhost by default
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [FC4 Regression]: spamc doesn't use localhost by default https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175439 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|fc4 |fc5 Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |NEEDINFO --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-16 22:38 EST --- [This comment added as part of a mass-update to all open FC4 kernel bugs] FC4 has now transitioned to the Fedora legacy project, which will continue to release security related updates for the kernel. As this bug is not security related, it is unlikely to be fixed in an update for FC4, and has been migrated to FC5. Please retest with Fedora Core 5. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207049] New: all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207049 Summary: all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-perl-devel- [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],parkerm @pobox.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207049] all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207049 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-18 19:41 EST --- Actually I take that last part back, it's not doing this to all mail, but a sizable chunk of it. I'll try to determine a pattern in the affected mails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207049] all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207049 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-18 20:33 EST --- UNPARSEABLE_RELAY may result from not properly interpreting a Received header. If it happens often, it may be the Received header from a local mail server, perhaps one of your MX servers if it doesn't happen every time. There have been some fixes to recognize certain headers that were flagged as unparseable. However, it is most likely that you are seeing the rule hit based on Received headers for a local server that should be listed using the internal_network and/or trusted_network options, as explained in http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207049] all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207049 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-18 22:48 EST --- Created an attachment (id=136596) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136596&action=view) complete headers for a failing message. The Received: lines in this header look ok to me. (I munged some of the addresses in this message, but the pertinent fields remain untouched). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207049] all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207049 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #136596|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207049] all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207049 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-18 22:55 EST --- btw, even if the unparsable headers rule was problematic, that doesn't explain this.. Yes, score=0.4 required=5.0 Even if that rule was being triggered correctly, 0.4 is still < 5.0, so why it chose "Yes" instead of "No" is mysterious. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207049] all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207049 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-19 01:29 EST --- The UNPARSEABLE_RELAY comes from the header Received: from pobox.devel.redhat.com ([unix socket]) The headers are correctly parsed and recognized as ALL_TRUSTED in the current SpamAssassin 3.2 development tree (upstream), but not the 3.1 branch. I didn't notice the anomaly in the scores. Aside from it being labeled as spam even though the score does not exceed the 5.0 threshold, it does look like something is wrong with the configuration. UNPARSEABLE_RELAY is supposed to have a score of 0.001. It is not a spam sign. It is only used as part of identifying Received headers that can be used for determining things, and as an informational indicator. That doesn't answer what caused this message to be labeled spam. The output from spamassassin -D applied to the message would show what is going on. I can't reproduce the scoring problem myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207049] all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207049 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-19 13:52 EST --- Hmm. I saved one of the affected mails, stripped out the spamassassin headers, and fed it to spamassassin -D. It marked it as ham. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.1.4 Very strange. It's running the same version of spamassassin as it was yesterday, with the same config files. Very puzzling. UNPARSABLE_RELAY was set to 3 in my local config as part of some test I was doing a while ago, that I forgot to remove. I've removed it now. Something that's really baking my noodle -- Since I filed this bug, it hasn't reproduced itself. My spamfolder now only contains spam again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207049] all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207049 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-19 14:03 EST --- You haven't actually mentioned how you're calling SA. Are you using spamc/spamd, spamassassin, or a third-party milter/daemon/etc ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207049] all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207049 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-19 16:59 EST --- Sorry about that. I have spamd running as a daemon, with spamc being triggered from .procmailrc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 204800] perl.prov script misparses some version information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl.prov script misparses some version information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-perl-devel- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207430] New: perl-LDAP should require perl(IO::Socket::SSL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207430 Summary: perl-LDAP should require perl(IO::Socket::SSL) Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-LDAP AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com perl-LDAP needs perl(IO::Socket::SSL) for some functions - for example: Right now trying to use smbldap-tools results in this error: Can't locate IO/Socket/SSL.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/sbin/ (etc...) See bug #122066, specifically comment #10 for more info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207430] perl-LDAP should require perl(IO::Socket::SSL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-LDAP should require perl(IO::Socket::SSL) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207430 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-21 06:32 EST --- Created an attachment (id=136839) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136839&action=view) Enables LDAPS Changelog * Adds perl(IO::Socket::SSL) to the build requirements list * Adds perl(IO::Socket::SSL) to the requirements list * Clears the lib/Net/LDAP/DSML.pm executable permission * Corrects the last changelog entry * A couple of other minor changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|fedora-perl-devel-
||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-21 08:34 EST ---
CC += fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
* I believe Jason is no longer around; maybe Robin Norwood could take over
this and try to contact the Red Hat Legal Department
* The core perl-RPM-Specfile package has the same problem:
- same author (Chip Turner)
- same initial packager (Chip Turner)
- it doesn't contain any copyright information
(http://search.cpan.org/dist/RPM-Specfile/)
- the specfile states the license is "GPL or Artistic"
$ rpm -qp --qf="%{license}\n" perl-RPM-Specfile-1.19-2.1.1.src.rpm
GPL or Artistic
* The upstream RPM package started including the perl RPM[2] module as of 4.4.3.
It now generates a rpm-perl subpackage (http://wraptastic.org/pub/rpm-4.4.x/)
$ rpm -qpl rpm-perl-4.4.3-1.i386.rpm
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi/RPM2.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/RPM2
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/RPM2/RPM2.so
/usr/share/man/man3/RPM2.3pm.gz
$ rpm -qpl rpm-perl-4.4.6-1.i386.rpm
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/RPM.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/RPM
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/RPM/RPM.so
/usr/share/man/man3/RPM.3pm.gz
Note: the rpm maintainer has renamed the perl module (RPM2 -> RPM)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 172336] getgrnam() crashes with "Out of memory" if /etc/group contains long lines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: getgrnam() crashes with "Out of memory" if /etc/group contains long lines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172336 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|security|normal Keywords||Security [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||FC5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-21 22:18 EST --- Closing bugs in MODIFIED state from prior Fedora releases. If this bug persists in a current Fedora release (such as Fedora Core 5 or later), please reopen and set the version appropriately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 174684] CVE-2005-3962 Perl integer overflow issue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: CVE-2005-3962 Perl integer overflow issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174684 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|security|normal Keywords||Security [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||FC5 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-21 22:19 EST --- Closing bugs in MODIFIED state from prior Fedora releases. If this bug persists in a current Fedora release (such as Fedora Core 5 or later), please reopen and set the version appropriately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 185242] ioctl default minimum argument length of 256 should be restored
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: ioctl default minimum argument length of 256 should be restored https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185242 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||FC5 Bug 185242 depends on bug 185240, which changed state. Bug 185240 Summary: ioctl default minimum argument length of 256 should be restored https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185240 What|Old Value |New Value Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Status|ON_QA |VERIFIED Status|VERIFIED|RELEASE_PENDING Resolution||ERRATA Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-21 22:19 EST --- Closing bugs in MODIFIED state from prior Fedora releases. If this bug persists in a current Fedora release (such as Fedora Core 5 or later), please reopen and set the version appropriately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207838] New: Perl getsockopt() on SCTP sockets doesn't work
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207838
Summary: Perl getsockopt() on SCTP sockets doesn't work
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc5
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
Description of problem:
Perl getsockopt() on SCTP socket does not work. Following perl code:
--
use strict;
use IO::Socket;
## create sctp socket
my $sock = new IO::Socket::INET(
Proto => 132,
Type => SOCK_STREAM
) or die "Cannot create sctp socket";
## read rto data
my $i = getsockopt($sock, 132, 1);
#print rto data
print join("\n", unpack("I i*", $i));
--
Works on Solaris10, but not on (my) Linux. I checked C getsockopt, and code like
this:
ret = getsockopt(sock , SOL_SCTP, SCTP_RTOINFO, &sctp_info, &len);
works OK only if len is initially set to sizeof(struct sctp_rtoinfo), which is
not what manual says:
---
> man getsockopt
...
The parameters optval and optlen are used to access option values for
setsockopt(). For getsockopt() they identify a buffer in which the
value for the requested option(s) are to be returned. For getsock-
opt(), optlen is a value-result parameter, initially containing the
size of the buffer pointed to by optval, and modified on return to
indicate the actual size of the value returned. If no option value is
to be supplied or returned, optval may be NULL.
...
---
Above applies to all SCTP structures available via get/setsockopt.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-5.8.8-5
glibc-2.4-11
kernel-2.6.17-1.2187_FC5
How reproducible:
every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. run perl code from description
2. nothing is displayed
Actual results:
nothing is displayed
Expected results:
sctp socket rto into (4 parameters)
Additional info:
SELinux is disabled.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207430] perl-LDAP should require perl(IO::Socket::SSL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-LDAP should require perl(IO::Socket::SSL) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207430 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-24 12:00 EST --- Thanks for the patch, Jose! I'll see about rolling it out tomorrow when I'm in the office. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-24 12:17 EST --- I can contact Chip to clarify the license. Since FC5 and FC6 both still seem to have rpm-4.4.2, I assume we still want to get this into extras, yes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-24 13:13 EST --- I wrote this and RPM::Specfile while at red hat. The license is the same as perl itself: Perl5 is Copyright (C) 1993-2005, by Larry Wall and others. It is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of either: a) the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 1, or (at your option) any later version, or b) the "Artistic License". from: http://dev.perl.org/licenses/ A lawyer or two from RH contacted me and I've told them the above on a few occasions. I'll look into making new CPAN releases of these modules with a clear license as well. HTH -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-24 18:20 EST --- And I didn't even have to say his name three times! Paul, is the above sufficient, or do you need to wait for the new CPAN release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-25 02:58 EST --- I'm happy to approve this now, but is Jason still around to maintain it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-25 12:30 EST --- No, he isn't. I'm maintaining most of the perl* packages for FC and RHEL, so I could take it if no-one else wants it. I'll send a quick mail to fedora-perl-devel to see if anyone else wants it first, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208315] New: Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208315 Summary: Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59 Product: Fedora Core Version: test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-Net-DNS AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Description of problem: Perl-Net-DNS-0.58 resolver search(), query(), bgsend() and send() methods not consistent in interpreting IPv4 and IPv6 addresses as a PTR query. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.58 Additional info: Since FC6-test3 went to press, Net::DNS 0.59 has been released. I realise that final release deadline is uncomfortably close, but think that the revised module fixes enough inconsistent and outright wrong behaviour to be well worth getting into FC6 if this is still possible. The CPAN bug references are: #20857 Resolver query() treats empty or undef name as default domain. #20994 Resolver search() erroneously applies search list to IPv6 address. #21402 Unable to prebuild PTR query from IP using Net::DNS:Packet->new(). The search() query() send() bgsend() and Packet->new() methods are now 100% consistent in the form of argument they accept. The inconsistency was reported in CPAN bug #20836 (later merged with #21402) I can confirm that revised module has been tested using FC5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208315] Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208315 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-27 22:52 EST --- I've built 0.59 as 'testing' for FC5 - I'm getting an odd error with the FC6 version that I'll investigate more in the morning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208315] Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208315 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-28 12:15 EST --- The FC6 error was my mistake - built for fc6 as well, and I've requested that the fedora release team push this as an update to fc6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208535] New: perl-Net-DNS package in FC6 is older than in FC5 updates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208535 Summary: perl-Net-DNS package in FC6 is older than in FC5 updates Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-Net-DNS AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] >From the automated check script : perl-Net-DNS FC5-updates > FC6 (0:0.59-1.fc5 > 0:0.58-1.fc6) So please update the FC6 package and make sure it gets in before FC6 final, otherwise the module might break for upgrades from FC5 to FC6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 150224] FC6 Blocker Tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FC6 Blocker Tracker Alias: FC6Blocker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=150224 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||208535 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208633] New: Update request for perl-DBD-MySQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208633 Summary: Update request for perl-DBD-MySQL Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-DBD-MySQL AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Jose requested an update of this package to version 3.0007 "It would make our life easier in Fedora Extras (sooner or later one of the 450+ perl modules that we maintain over there will require the latest version of the above modules)." This version is already available as an update in FC5, and there have been no complaints. The changelog: http://search.cpan.org/src/CAPTTOFU/DBD-mysql-3.0007/ChangeLog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208639] New: Update request for perl-Archive-Tar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208639 Summary: Update request for perl-Archive-Tar Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-Archive-Tar AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Jose requested an update of this package to version 1.30 "It would make our life easier in Fedora Extras (sooner or later one of the 450+ perl modules that we maintain over there will require the latest version of the above modules)." Changelog: http://search.cpan.org/src/KANE/Archive-Tar-1.30/CHANGES -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208639] Update request for perl-Archive-Tar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Update request for perl-Archive-Tar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208639 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-29 17:01 EST --- Package built and update request sent to fedora rel-eng. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208633] Update request for perl-DBD-MySQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Update request for perl-DBD-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-29 17:01 EST --- Package built and request sent to fedora rel-eng. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208731] New: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208731 Summary: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] >From Jose on fedora-perl-devel-list: Removing support for perl 5.8.3 and perl 5.8.4 reduces the number of directories in the perl search path (@INC), which improves the perl modules loading time. This has already been done in past for FC-4 where support for perl 5.8.0/5.8.1/5.8.2 has dropped. perl specfile patch: --- perl.spec.588_8 2006-07-14 22:22:06.0 +0100 +++ perl.spec 2006-09-17 16:10:58.0 +0100 @@ -26,9 +26,7 @@ Provides: perl(:WITHOUT_THREADS) %endif -%define perlmodcompat 5.8.7 5.8.6 5.8.5 5.8.4 5.8.3 -Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.3) -Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.4) +%define perlmodcompat 5.8.7 5.8.6 5.8.5 Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.5) Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6) Provides: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.7) Note: The FC-4 change was reported in the Release Notes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208731] Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208731 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||150224 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208315] Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208315 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||150224 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208535] perl-Net-DNS package in FC6 is older than in FC5 updates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Net-DNS package in FC6 is older than in FC5 updates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208535 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-30 23:27 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 208315 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208315] Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208315 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-30 23:28 EST --- *** Bug 208535 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208639] Update request for perl-Archive-Tar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Update request for perl-Archive-Tar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208639 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:16 EST --- The new version has been approved for inclusion in FC6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208633] Update request for perl-DBD-MySQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Update request for perl-DBD-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:17 EST --- The new version has been approved for inclusion in FC6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 194077] upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194077 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:26 EST --- assigning to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 199736] perl C compiler Can't locate object method "IVX" via package "B::NV"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl C compiler Can't locate object method "IVX" via package "B::NV" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199736 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:27 EST --- assigning to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 199372] PATCH: sparc64 use CFLAGS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PATCH: sparc64 use CFLAGS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199372 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:28 EST --- assigning to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 172739] Deep recursion in CGI::Carp::warn
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Deep recursion in CGI::Carp::warn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172739 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:29 EST --- assigning to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 142837] Need site-specific man page directory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Need site-specific man page directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=142837 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:30 EST --- assigning to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 199152] url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199152 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:31 EST --- assigning to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 175459] wrong coding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: wrong coding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:31 EST --- assigning to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 191416] h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A || defined B'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A || defined B' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191416 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:31 EST --- assigning to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 137202] getXXXent functions blow up after recursing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: getXXXent functions blow up after recursing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137202 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:32 EST --- assigning to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 172396] multi-threaded perl builds use localtime_r which does not call tzset
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: multi-threaded perl builds use localtime_r which does not call tzset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172396 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:32 EST --- assigning to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 188441] url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188441 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:33 EST --- assigning to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 178343] h2ph problem with gcc internal defines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: h2ph problem with gcc internal defines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178343 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:33 EST --- assigning to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 172792] use of study() with utf8 support enabled breaks regexps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: use of study() with utf8 support enabled breaks regexps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172792 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:34 EST --- assigning to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 199149] upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199149 Bug 199149 depends on bug 194077, which changed state. Bug 194077 Summary: upstream perl bugs fixed since 5.8.8 was released https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194077 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207430] perl-LDAP should require perl(IO::Socket::SSL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-LDAP should require perl(IO::Socket::SSL) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207430 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-03 12:26 EST --- Oops - the new version (perl-LDAP-0.33-3.fc6) has been in for awhile, but I neglected to update the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208731] Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208731 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-03 12:53 EST --- This is fixed in perl-5.8.8-10, which has been accepted for FC-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208731] Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208731 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-03 13:13 EST --- This might be a bit untimely, but is this just to improve loading times, or is there an actual incompatibility issue with modules built for 5.8.[34] and the perl 5.8.8 package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208731] Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208731 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-03 13:24 EST --- Pretty much just for the loading time improvements. It was discussed a bit on fedora-perl-devel-list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-perl-devel-list/2006-September/msg00028.html I discussed the issue a bit more offlist with Jose, and with Warren Togami, and it was agreed that the best thing to do was to go ahead and drop the directories. That discussion should've been more open, I apologize...we didn't mean to exclude anyone, I think fedora-perl-devel-list got dropped from the recipients accidentally. Do you anticipate any major problems with this change? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 173563] filelist cleanup: drop unnecessary files, eliminate duplicates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: filelist cleanup: drop unnecessary files, eliminate duplicates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173563 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 185406] h2ph problem with gcc internal defines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: h2ph problem with gcc internal defines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185406 Bug 185406 depends on bug 178343, which changed state. Bug 178343 Summary: h2ph problem with gcc internal defines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178343 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 199152] url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199152 Bug 199152 depends on bug 188441, which changed state. Bug 188441 Summary: url(-relative=>1) is broken in CGI.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188441 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 191416] h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A || defined B'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A || defined B' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191416 Bug 191416 depends on bug 191409, which changed state. Bug 191409 Summary: h2ph generates incorrect code for '#if defined A || defined B' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191409 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 200440] Building perl-5.8.8-8 without threading fails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Building perl-5.8.8-8 without threading fails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200440 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 19:34 EST --- assigning to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 204800] perl.prov script misparses some version information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl.prov script misparses some version information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207049] all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207049 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-12 16:49 EST --- This hasn't reoccured since that one evening, so I'm happy to close this unless you'd prefer to keep digging. The lack of reproducability severely impairs any effort to root cause it though. :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 207049] all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: all mail is being marked as spam even if the score doesn't make it spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207049 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-13 01:10 EST --- reopen if you're able to find a reproducer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 175439] [FC4 Regression]: spamc doesn't use localhost by default
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [FC4 Regression]: spamc doesn't use localhost by default https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175439 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-16 14:47 EST --- A new kernel update has been released (Version: 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5) based upon a new upstream kernel release. Please retest against this new kernel, as a large number of patches go into each upstream release, possibly including changes that may address this problem. This bug has been placed in NEEDINFO state. Due to the large volume of inactive bugs in bugzilla, if this bug is still in this state in two weeks time, it will be closed. Should this bug still be relevant after this period, the reporter can reopen the bug at any time. Any other users on the Cc: list of this bug can request that the bug be reopened by adding a comment to the bug. In the last few updates, some users upgrading from FC4->FC5 have reported that installing a kernel update has left their systems unbootable. If you have been affected by this problem please check you only have one version of device-mapper & lvm2 installed. See bug 207474 for further details. If this bug is a problem preventing you from installing the release this version is filed against, please see bug 169613. If this bug has been fixed, but you are now experiencing a different problem, please file a separate bug for the new problem. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 205562] maybe shouldn't provide perl(DB)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: maybe shouldn't provide perl(DB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205562 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-17 15:55 EST --- This fix didn't make it into FC6, but should be available as an update, and is fixed in FC7 and RHEL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208731] Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208731 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-17 16:14 EST --- *** Bug 205624 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 100786] DateManip needs to use zoneinfo database for source of timezones
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: DateManip needs to use zoneinfo database for source of timezones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100786 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |normal Keywords||FutureFeature [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-18 14:05 EST --- Red Hat Linux is no longer supported by Red Hat, Inc. If you are still running Red Hat Linux, you are strongly advised to upgrade to a current Fedora Core release or Red Hat Enterprise Linux or comparable. Some information on which option may be right for you is available at http://www.redhat.com/rhel/migrate/redhatlinux/. Red Hat apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We do want to make sure that no important bugs slip through the cracks. If this issue is still present in a current Fedora Core release, please open a new bug with the relevant information. Closing as CANTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 202402] Missing perl-Archive-Tar Dependancy in RPM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing perl-Archive-Tar Dependancy in RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202402 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-19 08:59 EST --- I'm running fc6t3+rawhide and it still fails because of LWP:UserAgent missing: raptor> sa-update --help Can't locate LWP/UserAgent.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8) at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91. raptor> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 202402] Missing perl-Archive-Tar Dependancy in RPM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing perl-Archive-Tar Dependancy in RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202402 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-19 09:09 EST --- Well I just installed cpan2rpm to try to build the missing perl modules and it installed perl-libwww-perl as a requirement. That fixed sa-learn so I guess it's just a missing Requires. The naming of perl module rpms can be a little bit non-intuitive sometimes. I did an intial yum search LWP and found some perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse and yet the parent module is named perl-libwww-perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 202402] Missing perl-Archive-Tar Dependancy in RPM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing perl-Archive-Tar Dependancy in RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202402 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-19 12:25 EST --- The right thing to do in a situation like this is "yum install 'perl(LWP::UserAgent)'". The package name follows the upstream name (with "perl-" tacked on to the beginning), which doesn't always make sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 212369] New: Use of uninitialized value in pattern match
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212369 Summary: Use of uninitialized value in pattern match Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-perl-devel- [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],parkerm @pobox.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Description of problem: I'm running spamass-milter along with spamassassin and I'm seeing these errors in /var/log/maillog: Oct 26 09:19:19 raptor spamd[2509]: Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 879, line 5. Oct 26 09:19:19 raptor spamd[2509]: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 953, line 5. The may be just warnings as mail is being tagged. Also saw this: Oct 26 11:28:21 raptor spamd[5990]: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK' Oct 26 11:28:21 raptor spamd[5990]: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp (running version 3.1.4) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): spamassassin-3.1.4-1.fc6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 205562] maybe shouldn't provide perl(DB)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: maybe shouldn't provide perl(DB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205562 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-26 11:31 EST --- $ rpm -q --provides perl-Crypt-SSLeay SSLeay.so perl(Crypt::SSLeay) = 0.51 perl(Crypt::SSLeay::CTX) perl(Crypt::SSLeay::Conn) perl(Crypt::SSLeay::Err) perl(Crypt::SSLeay::MainContext) perl(Crypt::SSLeay::X509) perl(Net::SSL) = 2.77 perl-Crypt-SSLeay = 0.51-11.fc7 Verified, I close the bug with resolution RAWHIDE, feel free to do otherwise if it is a mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 208731] Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Remove directories for old versions of perl from @INC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208731 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-27 20:15 EST --- On a belated note... :) I don't anticipate any problems, but it's good to know the history of a change like this when it's not on the perl list. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 212792] New: FC5=>FC6 upgrade replaced local.cf with default stub file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212792 Summary: FC5=>FC6 upgrade replaced local.cf with default stub file Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-perl-devel- [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],parkerm @pobox.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Description of problem: The upgrade process saved the local.cf file, and repaced with a default stub, removing critical site specific settings to protect from excessive spam. Unless there are critical version skew problems with file formats and options, production configuration files should be left in place during an upgrade/update process ... and the new file installed as .rpmnew. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: appears always, did for both of our servers. Steps to Reproduce: 1.CDROM upgrade from FC5=>FC6 2. 3. Actual results: spamassassin is cripled by having site specific settings removed. Expected results: upgrade should leave existing configuration files untouched, unless there are compelling changes in file format or options requiring manual intervention after an upgrade/update. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 129724] can`t been install mode one rpm at transaction
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: can`t been install mode one rpm at transaction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129724 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|test3 |fc3test1 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-29 16:59 EST --- Changing version to correct one. (test1 -> fc3test1, and some were filed as test3 accidentally instead; but clearly must be fc3test1 given the date of filing.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 175439] [FC4 Regression]: spamc doesn't use localhost by default
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [FC4 Regression]: spamc doesn't use localhost by default https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175439 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NeedsRetesting -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
