Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 4/16/07, Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:01 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
On 4/16/07, Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, that seems to be the consensus. We'll roll the split into F7, add
the needed packages
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 11:37 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote:
o We get those packages added to the standard buildroots - since perl is
already considered standard, it isn't really a stretch to me for the
-devel and related packages to be there too.
Yeah. I think this is the best bet.
--
Fedora
Robin Norwood wrote:
So,
I was waiting for feedback on the latest iteration of the perl spec file
before proceeding, but I haven't really gotten any - I guess people are
generally busy with their day jobs, etc. However, we need to make a
call here with the perl spec file. The way things are
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 16:56 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
I was quite happy to add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or whatever's
appropriate for a given module for the packages I maintain. I'm still
happy to do this.
I can understand the desire to put perl-devel in the buildroot given the
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 11:37 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote:
So,
I was waiting for feedback on the latest iteration of the perl spec file
before proceeding, but I haven't really gotten any - I guess people are
generally busy with their day jobs, etc.
[3 proposals]
That's what I've been
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 18:12 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 11:37 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote:
So,
I was waiting for feedback on the latest iteration of the perl spec file
before proceeding, but I haven't really gotten any - I guess people are
generally busy with
Tom \spot\ Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 16:56 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
I was quite happy to add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or whatever's
appropriate for a given module for the packages I maintain. I'm still
happy to do this.
I can understand the desire
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:58 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote:
Tom \spot\ Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 16:56 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
I was quite happy to add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or whatever's
appropriate for a given module for the packages I maintain.
On 4/16/07, Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, that seems to be the consensus. We'll roll the split into F7, add
the needed packages to the buildroots, and get the perl-* spec files
fixed for F8. I'll get an email together to fedora devel list
explaining the changes and asking for
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:01 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
On 4/16/07, Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, that seems to be the consensus. We'll roll the split into F7, add
the needed packages to the buildroots, and get the perl-* spec files
fixed for F8. I'll get an email together to
On 4/16/07, Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:01 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
On 4/16/07, Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, that seems to be the consensus. We'll roll the split into F7, add
the needed packages to the buildroots, and get the perl-*
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:58 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote:
Tom \spot\ Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 16:56 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
I was quite happy to add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or whatever's
appropriate for a given module for the packages I maintain.
12 matches
Mail list logo