[Felix-language] working with errors

I've been spending the past couple weeks thinking about errors. This is one thing we haven't really explored much. Currently, all that we really do is just error out, but that's not really a great solution. So, while I don't really have a solution yet, I figure we should probably start a dialog on

Re: [Felix-language] making schannel's read proc be a generator

On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 19:48 -0700, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > Right now schannel's read is a proc which means you have to explicitly > pass in a variable that is assigned the value read from the channel. > I think this was how things were done before generators. Yes, you can try an experiment wi

Re: [Felix-language] making schannel's read proc be a generator

On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 19:48 -0700, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > Right now schannel's read is a proc which means you have to explicitly > pass in a variable that is assigned the value read from the channel. I > think this was how things were done before generators. Now that we got > generators though,

[Felix-language] making schannel's read proc be a generator

Right now schannel's read is a proc which means you have to explicitly pass in a variable that is assigned the value read from the channel. I think this was how things were done before generators. Now that we got generators though, is there any way to do it the old way? I'd love to be able to use c