> From: john skaller
> Subject: Re: [Felix-language] [felix] operator in
>> I'm fine with replacing whilst with while. I've been meaning to do that
>> forever.
>
> Well RF was using the library function while, so it would have broken
> code, but I don't think anyone (except me now) is actually
> From: john skaller
>
> On 28/10/2010, at 1:52 AM, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
>
>> Don't we have an "isin" operator that does this already?
>
>
>>> I just added "operator in" which lets you say
>>>
>>> x in C
>>>
>>> where C is a list or array.
>
>
> I think we did (not sure). But who can remember th
I just added "operator in" which lets you say
x in C
where C is a list or array. Should be extended to varray and avl.
Precedence same as comparisons < > etc. Binds to function
fun mem[T]: T * C[T] -> bool
which I added to List and Array modules. There's a potential parsing conflict
with "let .
