On 24/01/2011, at 6:51 AM, john skaller wrote:
>
> On 24/01/2011, at 6:41 AM, john skaller wrote:
>
>>
>> Be warned, to implement the match thing I have changed the merge rule to keep
>> all possible interpretations of expressions. If you do something ambiguous it
>> may propagate into stateme
On 24/01/2011, at 6:41 AM, john skaller wrote:
>
> Be warned, to implement the match thing I have changed the merge rule to keep
> all possible interpretations of expressions. If you do something ambiguous it
> may propagate into statements. These don't allow ambiguity.
Oops.. now I get a weir
