Re: [Felix-language] [felix] operator in

2010-10-29 Thread Ben Smith
2010/10/30 Jacques Carette : > You still have a few semi-lurkers, yes. +1 ben -- You know we all became mathematicians for the same reason: we were lazy.   --Max Rosenlicht -- Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling Al

Re: [Felix-language] [felix] operator in

2010-10-29 Thread Jacques Carette
On 27/10/2010 5:35 PM, john skaller wrote: > Good mind to replace whilst with while too. Might break some > code .. but hey, do we have any actual users? Anyone else > actually reading this mailing list? You still have a few semi-lurkers, yes. Jacques

Re: [Felix-language] [felix] operator in

2010-10-27 Thread john skaller
On 28/10/2010, at 12:43 PM, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:35 PM, john skaller > wrote: >> >> I think we did (not sure). But who can remember that or want >> to use such ugliness... :) > > :) We could also add a multi token operator and just literally have "is in". > >> Go

Re: [Felix-language] [felix] operator in

2010-10-27 Thread john skaller
On 28/10/2010, at 1:52 AM, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > Don't we have an "isin" operator that does this already? >> I just added "operator in" which lets you say >> >> x in C >> >> where C is a list or array. I think we did (not sure). But who can remember that or want to use such ugliness...