I would like to share what I think is very important information with others 
who have cats diagnosed with Feline Leukemia.

I had a cat with leukemia as a kitten, and he lived to the age of 7 and died 
from something else that I don't believe was related to the leukemia. When the 
vets told me that they could do nothing for him as a kitten dying with leukemia 
(and he WAS dying - his red cells were dropping down to nothing and I had given 
him TWO blood transfusions that weren't holding up his numbers to any great 
degree) then as a last ditch effort, I tried some Winstrol I had in the 
cupboard that a previous vet had given to me for another cat.

This medication turned him completely around. To monitor his condition, we were 
performing weekly blood tests on him - CBC, liver function, etc. After being 
put on the Winstrol, his red cells and white cell counts began to climb very 
quickly and steadily. It was totally amazing and the vets couldn't believe the 
lab results either. My beautiful little boy was out of the woods in about six 
months. We were obsessively checking the pinkness of his ears, gums and pads to 
check the status of his profound anemia, and to our unbelievable joy, he began 
to get pink and his lab results just kept getting better. After about a year, I 
called back the internal medicine veterinarian we had seen, and who had told us 
there was no hope, and told him of our beautiful cat's recovery. To my surprise 
- and a little bit of anger - he said that I had gone "old school" and that 
Winstrol used to be used but then there were rumours of possible liver damage 
associated with it, and vets stopped prescribing it. This REALLY annoyed me. My 
cat was dying and no one thought that maybe, just maybe, some treatment - even 
with a potential side effect - was better than no treatment??? In our 
experience, on a few occasions the liver enzymes would indeed rise, but would 
drop back down to normal fairly quickly after a short break from the Winstrol. 
We monitored our beautiful Zander very closely during and after his initial 
crisis, and if I thought that maybe he was looking pale again, or if the CBC 
came back with a significantly dropping red cell count, we would put him back 
on the Winstrol for a 4 to 6 week period, and it would fix him right up.

The Winstrol also really helped to increase his appetite so I could get him to 
eat when he was so very sick.

I used it at a level of 1 mg two times a day when he was really sick, and when 
he started to recover, I cut it back to 1 mg a day, or even 1/2 mg a day for a 
maintenance dose. I would often pair it with prednisone as well.

I have looked after a very large number of strays over the years and I have a 
science and medicine background in science and microbiology and laboratory 
medicine, so I tested and analyzed the lab results we were getting, using this 
knowledge. I have since used Winstrol in my cats in a number of other 
situations where vets have told me there is no hope, and I have to say that it 
has come through more often than not.

I therefore could not understand the reluctance of the veterinary - and medical 
community for that matter - to consider Winstrol, especially in circumstances 
where vets are telling pet owners that there are no other options and their 
kitten or cat will die.

I have had to do a fair amount of internet research and spoken to a number of 
veterinarians about this. I have personally concluded that due to the 
association of Winstrol with athletic doping scandals, the scientific community 
as a whole has decided to abandon what might indeed be a promising drug. This 
saddens me but I simply can see no other explanation. I mean really - does it 
make sense to hear from vets that the drug MAY cause liver disease, when your 
animal is dying???? Wouldn't you give that option in those circumstances, and 
let the pet owner understand the risks??? Personally, I think that the risk of 
permanent liver damage is not a significant risk. The  information I have been 
able to find - buried so very deeply as to be almost unable to be found on the 
Internet - points to any change in the liver enzymes as being transitory and 
not representing any lasting liver damage. That was certainly our experience. 
Because Zander's condition was so dire, even when his liver enzymes started to 
go up, I decided to keep him on the Winstrol because I could see that his bone 
marrow had turned back on again and he was producing red cells ( with his 
reticulocyte level starting to go up from basically a zero level). He was 
eating and looking better, so I grit my teeth and proceeded with the Winstrol. 
I suspect that many vets might have abandoned ship at that point, and pulled 
the Winstrol before it had had an opportunity to really have the desired 
effect, but my vet was at least good enough to recognize that if this treatment 
didn't work, my cat was out of luck, and she allowed me to continue on with the 
Winstrol since Zander was doing better in so many other ways.

This was also our experience when I used Winstrol in another very elderly cat 
who had a large and aggressive sarcoma in her sinus cavity, and again who was 
not expected to live very long. She lived another 3 years after the diagnosis 
(she was around 19 when she passed away), and I believe that the Winstrol 
helped immensely in getting her to keep eating, and to keep the swelling under 
control. With her, we definitely found that her liver enzymes spiked 
dramatically with the use of the Winstrol, but settled down immediately with a 
brief discontinuance of the drug.

Zander died at age 7 from cardiomyopathy - nothing to do with his liver. I 
tortured myself with thoughts that maybe the Winstrol had caused the 
cardiomyopathy, and for all I know, it did. However, again, I did a fair amount 
of research and initially, I found references to a link between Winstrol and 
cardiac damage, but the link was pretty tenuous at best, and seemed to be 
suspected in athletes who had taken Winstrol at 100 X the recommended dosages 
for years and years. My guilt has never gone away because of course, you never 
know, but what I do know is that I would have lost him when he was only a year 
old. If the Winstrol managed to give me 6 more very good years with my cat, who 
played and was exceptionally affectionate and showed an extreme happiness with 
his life, then I would have to say I have no hesitation in doing it again.

What I find truly bizarre is that given the death sentence that this disease 
represents to cats, it should be very simple indeed to (a) have vets try the 
Winstrol and see what their experience is with it (with the proviso that they 
shouldn't pull a cat off the Winstrol just because the liver enzymes start to 
go up) and (b) why haven't there been some decent clinical trials with this 
stuff? The cats are zero given probability of surviving this disease. Even if 
Winstrol only works sometimes, that is better than the odds we are given for 
these cats at the moment.





Oakley & Oakley

Oakley & Oakley Professional Corporation
Barristers & Solicitors
Markham Executive Suites
3601 Highway 7, Suite 400
Markham, Ontario
L3R 0M3

T: (905) 943-4946




_______________________________________________
Felvtalk mailing list
Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org

Reply via email to