RE: This is what the vet said...

2005-06-16 Thread Chris
] On Behalf Of catatonya Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 11:36 PM To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org Subject: RE: This is what the vet said... True. I really think anyone bringing new cats who test negative should still retest 60-90 days later to be truly sure. And then during that time the cat could

Re: This is what the vet said...

2005-06-16 Thread Lewis Faye
When my cat tested positive, they tested with the IFA the same day. Of course, my cat was dreadfully ill. With my negative cats that were exposed, they had me have tests every 90 days for a year. Then I moved to every six months for a year. I am due now for another test and if it is neg, I will go

Re: This is what the vet said...

2005-06-16 Thread catatonya
When this first happened to me I retested and retested. I finally stopped. Now I only retest if one of my negatives gets sick. We test immediately to rule that out. Over (it's been about 10 years now nearly) this time I've lost one positive and 4 negatives. Even when my negatives got sick and died

RE: This is what the vet said...

2005-06-15 Thread Chris
Your instincts are rightthis vet doesnt sound like he knows what hes talking about! Both my pos were tested with IFA almost immediately after pos Elissa. If the IFA is neg, then retesting at various intervals is in order in the archives there is a chart that talks about discordant results

Re: This is what the vet said...

2005-06-15 Thread TenHouseCats
i don't think you have to wait 30 days, but unless you have some idea of when the cat was exposed, a positive test may mean nothing--just as a negative may not, for that matter--80% of healthy adults seem to throw off the virus, so knowing at what stage you're testing is the only way to know if a

RE: This is what the vet said...

2005-06-15 Thread Chris
dearly without ever knowing if they were pos or not! Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of TenHouseCats Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 4:13 PM To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org Subject: Re: This is what the vet said... i

Re: This is what the vet said...

2005-06-15 Thread catatonya
The IFA is more definitive, but I really don't see any reason to give it right away. If Tom still tests positive or even negative on the elisa in 30 days I would retest with IFA as a means of double checking the results. Tom is a lucky cat to have found such a good home! Also, I didn't realize

RE: This is what the vet said...

2005-06-15 Thread catatonya
True, you can do it right away, but if the IFA comes back negative I still don't think you'd want to vaccinate for felv without waiting an interval of time, so why waste the money on a 2nd test right now? If it were me, I would wait 60 days to be sure, and then I would go have both tests. That is

RE: This is what the vet said...

2005-06-15 Thread catatonya
y, June 15, 2005 4:13 PMTo: felvtalk@felineleukemia.orgSubject: Re: This is what the vet said...i don't think you "have" to wait 30 days, but unless you have someidea of when the cat was exposed, a positive test may meannothing--just as a negative may not, for that matter--80% of healthy

Re: This is what the vet said...

2005-06-15 Thread EWagner7701
Tonya, I didn't know there was a heartworm test either! They did a blood test that will take from 1-7 days (I guess they run 2 tests on it). There was an article in our paper that heartworm is particularly bad this year, and since he came in from outside, we wanted to be sure. It was marked in his